2018 Federal Register, 83 FR 45458; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45458-45460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19298]

[[Page 45458]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R1-ES-2018-N106; FXES11140100000-189-FF01E00000]

Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Amendment to the
1997 Washington State Department of Natural Resources State Lands
Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have jointly
developed with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) a revised draft environmental impact statement (RDEIS)
addressing an amendment to the 1997 WDNR State Lands Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) to cover the implementation of a Long-Term
Conservation Strategy (LTCS) for the marbled murrelet. The RDEIS also
addresses an amendment to the Endangered Species Act incidental take
permit (ITP) for take of marbled murrelet resulting from the
implementation of the LTCS. The RDEIS is intended to satisfy the
requirements of both the National Environmental Policy Act and the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act. If approved, the proposed
LTCS will replace an interim marbled murrelet conservation strategy
that is currently being implemented under the WDNR HCP.

DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
November 6, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view the pertinent documents for this proposal, request
further information, or submit comments, please use one of the
following methods, and note that your information request or comments
are in reference to FWS-R1-ES-2018-N106.
Internet: You can view the RDEIS on the internet at
www.fws.gov/WWFWO/ or at www.dnr.wa.gov/long-term-conservation-strategy-marbled-murrelet.
Hard Copy: Contact one of the sources listed in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to request hard copies.
Email: Comments may be submitted electronically to WDNR at
sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov. WDNR will transmit all comments received to the
Service.
U.S. Mail: Comments may also be submitted in writing to:
Todd Welker, SEPA Center, Washington Department of Natural Resources,
P.O. Box 47001, Olympia, WA 98504-7015. WDNR will transmit all comments
received to the Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact either of the
following:
Mark Ostwald, by telephone at 360-753-9564, by email at
Mark_Ostwald@fws.gov, or by U.S. mail at Washington Fish and Wildlife
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 510 Desmond Dr., Suite 102,
Lacey, WA 98503; or
Todd Welker, SEPA Center, WDNR, by telephone at 360-902-
2117, or by email at sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov.
You may alternatively contact either of the above individuals via
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), have jointly developed with the Washington State Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR) a revised draft environmental impact
statement (RDEIS) addressing an amendment to the 1997 WDNR State Lands
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to cover the implementation of a Long-
Term Conservation Strategy (LTCS) for the marbled murrelet. The RDEIS
also addresses an amendment to the Endangered Species Act section 10
incidental take permit (ITP) for take of marbled murrelet resulting
from the implementation of the LTCS. The RDEIS is intended to satisfy
the requirements of both the National Environmental Policy Act and the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act. If approved, the proposed
LTCS will replace an interim conservation strategy for the marbled
murrelet, which is currently being implemented under the WDNR HCP.
The Service and WDNR have jointly developed a RDEIS for the purpose
of analyzing alternatives for the LTCS for the marbled murrelet. The
RDEIS analyses seven action alternatives and a no action alternative.
If approved, the amended ITP would authorize incidental take of the
marbled murrelet that would occur as a result of implementation of the
LTCS over the remaining 50-year term of the WDNR HCP. The scope of the
proposed amendment to the WDNR HCP and ITP, and thus of the RDEIS, is
exclusively limited to consideration of the LTCS for the marbled
murrelet.
In addition to this notice, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is also publishing a notice announcing the availability of
the RDEIS, as required under section 309 of the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). The publication of EPA's notice is the official
start of the public comment period for the RDEIS (see EPA's Role in the
EIS Process).

Background

The marbled murrelet (Brachyamphus marmoratus), a seabird, was
listed as threatened in 1992 under the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). In 1996, the WDNR released
their draft HCP for forest management activities covering 1.6 million
acres of forested State trust lands within the range of the northern
spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) in Washington. A draft EIS
dated March 1996 was jointly developed by the Service, National Marine
Fisheries Service, and the WDNR to address the issuance of ITPs for the
HCP, and was announced in the Federal Register on April 5, 1996 (61 FR
15297). The 1996 draft EIS analyzed reasonable alternatives, including
the HCP, for forest management activities on forested State trust lands
that would be covered by the ITPs. A notice of availability for the
final EIS (FEIS) was published in the Federal Register on November 1,
1996 (61 FR 56563). On January 30, 1997, the Service issued an ITP
(Permit No. 812521) for the WDNR HCP covering multiple species. The
Service's ITP decision and the availability of related decision
documents were announced in the Federal Register on February 27, 1997
(62 FR 8980).
The WDNR HCP (see www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/forest-resources/habitat-conservation-state-trust-lands) commits the WDNR to
developing a LTCS for the marbled murrelet (HCP IV. 39). At the time
the HCP was prepared, it was determined that development of a LTCS was
not possible due to a lack of scientific information. For this reason,
the WDNR developed an interim conservation strategy for the marbled
murrelet, which is currently being implemented. The proposed amendment
to the WDNR HCP is the final step in the process for development of the
LTCS.
Briefly, the interim conservation strategy for the marbled murrelet
includes the following components:
(1) Identification of blocks of suitable marbled murrelet habitat
on which timber harvest would be deferred;
(2) Implementation of a habitat relationship study using marbled
murrelet occupancy surveys to determine the relative importance of
forested habitats;
(3) Based on the findings of the habitat relationship study,
identification of the lowest quality habitat blocks to be made
available for timber harvest (these areas were expected to contain
about 5 percent of the marbled murrelet-occupied sites on HCP-covered
lands);

[[Page 45459]]

(4) Implementation of surveys of higher quality habitat blocks
identified by the habitat relationship study to determine marbled
murrelet occupancy, and protection of murrelet-occupied habitats, along
with some unoccupied habitat; and
(5) Development of a LTCS for the marbled murrelet on WDNR lands.
A Federal Register notice of availability (81 FR 89135) for a draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the LTCS was published for a
90-day comment period on December 9, 2016. The 2016 DEIS did not
specify a preferred alternative. The public comment period for the 2016
DEIS was 90 days, and over 5,000 comments were received. In 2017, the
WDNR selected a preferred alternative with guidance from the Washington
Board of Natural Resources, necessitating development of an RDEIS. This
alternative was submitted in an application to the Service requesting a
permit amendment in July 2018.
This RDEIS differs from the 2016 DEIS in the following ways: (1)
The WDNR has developed and selected a preferred WDNR alternative
(alternative H), which was not previously identified; (2) a new
alternative (alternative G) has been included in response to specific
public comments; (3) the WDNR forest estate model, or large data
overlay model, has been rerun with WDNR-identified corrections,
resulting in different acreage outputs for all the alternatives; (4)
the WDNR and the Service have identified separate purpose and needs
statements in Chapter 1; and (5) the marbled murrelet population
viability analysis has been rerun with modifications.

Endangered Species Act Compliance

Section 9 of the ESA prohibits take of fish and wildlife species
listed as endangered or threatened under section 4 of the ESA. Under
the ESA, the term ``take'' means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532(19)). The term ``harm,'' as defined in our
regulations, includes significant habitat modification or degradation
that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding,
or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term ``harass'' is defined in our
regulations as intentional or negligent actions that create the
likelihood of injury to listed species to such an extent as to
significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns, which include but are
not limited to breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that authorize take of federally listed species, provided the
take is incidental to, and not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing permits for endangered and threatened
species are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively. Section
10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA contains provisions for issuing ITPs to non-
Federal entities for the take of endangered and threatened species,
provided the following criteria are met:
(1) The taking will be incidental;
(2) The applicant will prepare a conservation plan that, to the
maximum extent practicable, identifies the steps the applicant will
take to minimize and mitigate the impact of such taking;
(3) The applicant will ensure that adequate funding for the plan
will be provided;
(4) The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
(5) The applicant will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes
of the plan.

National Environmental Policy Act Compliance

The proposed amendment of the ITP and the 1997 WDNR HCP to cover
the LTCS for the marble murrelet is a Federal action that triggers the
need for compliance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). We and WDNR
have jointly developed the RDEIS for the purpose of analyzing the
environmental impacts of different alternatives for the LTCS under the
HCP and ITP. The RDEIS analyzes the DNR's preferred alternative, six
additional alternatives, and a no-action alternative, for a total of
eight alternatives.
WDNR manages approximately 1.38 million acres within 55 miles of
marine waters, which is the known inland limit of the nesting range for
the marbled murrelet. The RDEIS analyzes Alternative H as DNR's
preferred alternative. The Service is not presently identifying a
preferred alternative, but will for the final environmental impact
statement (FEIS). The no-action alternative involves continuation of
the interim conservation strategy for the marbled murrelet under the
WDNR HCP. The alternatives in the RDEIS are restricted to
implementation within this area.
The alternatives represent a range of approaches to long-term
marbled murrelet habitat conservation on WDNR lands. The alternatives
differ in the amount and location of WDNR-managed forest land
designated for long-term conservation of the murrelet. Alternatives
also include a variety of conservation measures proposed to protect
marbled murrelet habitat. The alternatives also differ in the amount
and quality of marbled murrelet habitat removed through timber harvest.

EPA's Role in the EIS Process

The EPA is charged under section 309 of the Clean Air Act to review
all Federal agencies' EISs and to comment on the adequacy and the
acceptability of the environmental impacts of proposed actions in the
EISs. EPA also serves as the repository (EIS database) for EISs
prepared by Federal agencies and provides notice of their availability
in the Federal Register. The EIS database provides information about
EISs prepared by Federal agencies, as well as EPA's comments concerning
the EISs. All EISs are filed with EPA, which publishes a notice of
availability on Fridays in the Federal Register. For more information,
see https://www.epa.gov/nepa. You may search for EPA comments on EISs,
along with EISs themselves, at https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

Public Meetings

We will hold four public meetings during the public comment period,
at the following locations in the State of Washington: Ballard,
Burlington, Cathlamet, and Forks. The dates, times, and specific
locations of the meetings will be posted on the internet at https://www.dnr.wa.gov/mmltcs. The public meetings will be physically
accessible to people with disabilities. Please direct requests for
reasonable accommodations (e.g., auxiliary aids or sign language
interpretation) to one of the sources listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, at least 7 working days prior to the date of the meeting you
wish to attend.

Public Comments

You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed in ADDRESSES. We will also accept written comments at four
public meetings, to be announced. We specifically request information
on the following:
1. Biological information on the marbled murrelet in the
terrestrial and marine environments;
2. Cumulative effects on the environment that might influence the
status of the marbled murrelet in the ESA listed range;
3. Resiliency of the alternatives in providing current and future
marbled murrelet habitat in relation to climate

[[Page 45460]]

change and future natural disturbance events such as fire and
windstorms;
4. Adequacy of the distribution of marbled murrelet habitat within
the HCP covered area to provide for murrelet conservation over the
remaining term of the HCP;
5. Other aspects of the human environment not already identified in
the DEIS that may be affected, pursuant to NEPA regulations in the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1506.6.
Comments received from the 2016 DEIS public comment period were
used to inform the RDEIS. Comments received on the DEIS and this RDEIS
will be responded to in the FEIS. If you submitted comments during the
comment period for the DEIS, you do not need to resubmit those
comments.

Public Availability of Comments

All comments and materials we receive become part of the public
record associated with this action. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other personally identifiable
information in your comments, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personally identifiable information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally identifiable information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. All
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, will be made available for public disclosure in their
entirety. Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we use in preparing the FEIS, will be available for
public inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at our
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES).

Next Steps

The HCP amendment for the LTCS is intended to replace the interim
conservation strategy for the marbled murrelet. We will evaluate that
request, associated documents, and public comments in reaching a final
decision on whether the application for a permit amendment meets the
requirements of section 10 of the ESA. We will prepare responses to
public comments and publish a notice of availability for the FEIS. The
FEIS will identify the WDNR preferred alternative for the amendment,
and also the Service's preferred alternative. We will also evaluate
whether the proposed permit action would comply with section 7 of the
ESA by conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation. We will use
the results of this consultation, in combination with the above
findings, in our final analysis to determine whether or not to approve
the proposed amendment of the WDNR HCP and ITP. If the ESA section 10
issuance requirements are met, we will approve the amendment of the ITP
and HCP. We will issue a record of decision and approve or deny the ITP
and HCP amendment request by WDNR no sooner than 30 days after
publication of the notice of availability of the FEIS.

Authority

We provide this notice in accordance with the requirements of
section 10(c) of the ESA and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22
and 17.32) and NEPA and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).

Theresa E. Rabot,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19298 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P