[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24955-24958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10067]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-MB-2015-N062; FF08M00000-FXMB12310800000-145]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Pacific Gas &
Electric Company Eagle Conservation Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement;
notice of scoping meeting and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Pacific
Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) (Applicant) proposed Eagle
Conservation Plan (ECP) and request for a 30-year programmatic eagle
take permit for take of bald eagles and golden eagles under the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act). The ECP, which serves as
the foundation of the permit application, is a comprehensive plan that
addresses take of the eagles associated with PG&E's existing
infrastructure and operations and maintenance (O&M) activities
throughout the Plan Area, which encompasses about two-thirds of the
State of California. We provide this notice to (1) describe the
proposed action; (2) advise other Federal and state agencies,
potentially affected tribal interests, and the public of our intent to
prepare an EIS; (3) announce the initiation of a 60-day public scoping
period; and (4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of
issues and possible alternatives to be included in the EIS. We also
announce plans for a public scoping meeting and the opening of a public
comment period. We request data, comments, new information, or
suggestions from the public, governmental agencies, the scientific
community, tribes, industry, or any other interested party.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
June 30, 2015. A public scoping meeting will be held on May 21, 2015,
at Red Lion Hotel Woodlake Conference Center, 500 Leisure Lane,
Sacramento, CA 95815.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information
request or comment is in reference to the PG&E Eagle Conservation Plan
EIS:
Email: [fw8_eagle_nepa@fws.gov]. Include ``PG&E Eagle
Conservation Plan EIS'' in the subject line of the message.
[[Page 24956]]
U.S. Mail: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Regional Office, 2800
Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Fax: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, (916) 414-
6486; Attn: PG&E Eagle Conservation Plan EIS Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird
Program, at the address shown above or at (916) 414-6651 (telephone).
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), intend to prepare a draft environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) (Applicant)
proposed Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) and request for a 30-year
programmatic eagle take permit under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (Eagle Act). The ECP serves as the foundation of the
permit application. The ECP summarizes the applicant's current
voluntary approach to address eagle and bird impacts associated with
PG&E's existing infrastructure and operations and maintenance (O&M)
activities throughout their ECP Plan Area (Plan Area).
The ECP is a comprehensive plan that addresses the take of bald
eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos)
associated with PG&E's existing infrastructure and O&M activities
throughout the Plan Area, which encompasses about two-thirds of the
State of California. The ECP also provides measures to avoid, minimize,
and mitigate for eagle mortality. The draft EIS will evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives related to the proposed issuance of a
programmatic eagle take permit to PG&E for bald and golden eagles that
results from system-wide standard O&M at their infrastructure and
facilities.
We provide this notice to (1) describe the proposed action; (2)
advise other Federal and state agencies, potentially affected tribal
interests, and the public of our intent to prepare an EIS; (3) announce
the initiation of a 60-day public scoping period; and (4) obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues and possible
alternatives to be included in the EIS.
We also announce plans for a public scoping meeting and the opening
of a public comment period. We request data, comments, new information,
or suggestions from the public, governmental agencies, the scientific
community, tribes, industry, or any other interested party.
We publish this notice in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, et
seq.; NEPA), and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1500-1508 as well as Section 668a of the
Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668a-668d).
Introduction
The Service is considering an application from PG&E, under the
Eagle Act, for a 30-year programmatic take permit for bald and golden
eagles. PG&E has prepared an ECP, which addresses incidental take of
bald and golden eagles from electrocution and collision with above-
ground electric transmission and distribution lines (collectively power
lines), as well as disturbance of nesting eagles during various
operations and maintenance (O&M) activities within the Plan Area. The
Plan Area encompasses PG&E's Service Area including all electric and
hydroelectric facilities located within the state of California. The
ECP analyzes their system's risk to eagles. It also identifies measures
to avoid, minimize and mitigate eagle mortality associated with those
activities. The Plan Area is within the following California Counties:
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced
Modoc
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Placer
Plumas
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Francisco
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
Siskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba
Background
Eagles are protected under the Eagle Act, which prohibits take and
disturbance of individuals and nests. Take under the Eagle Act includes
any actions that pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture,
trap, collect, destroy, molest, and disturb eagles. Disturb is further
defined in 50 CFR 22.3 as ``to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle
to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best
scientific information available (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease
in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by
substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering
behavior.''
Prior to 2009, permits for purposeful take of birds or body parts
were limited to scientific (50 CFR 22.21), religious (50 CFR 22.22), or
falconry (50 CFR 22.24) pursuits; for eagles causing serious injury to
livestock or other wildlife (50 CFR 22.23); and for golden eagle nests
that interfere with resource development or recovery operations (50 CFR
22.21-25). In 2009, we issued the Final Rule for Eagle Permits; Take
Necessary to Protect Interests in Particular Localities (2009 Final
Rule) on new permit regulations that allow take ``for the protection of
. . . other interests in any particular locality'' and where the take
is ``associated with and not the purpose of an otherwise lawful
activity . . .'' (September 11, 2009; 74 FR 46836-46879). The 2009
Final Rule authorizes programmatic take (take that is recurring and not
in a specific, identifiable timeframe and/or location) of eagles only
if avoidance measures have been implemented to the maximum extent
achievable. PG&E's activities are programmatic and existed prior to the
2009 Final Rule. Considerations for issuing take permits
[[Page 24957]]
include the health of the local and regional eagle populations,
availability of suitable nesting and foraging habitat for any displaced
eagles, and whether the take and associated mitigation provide a net
benefit to eagles (74 FR 46836-46879). The programmatic take permit
under the 2009 Final Rule was valid up to 5 years. In 2012, we proposed
to extend the maximum term for programmatic take permits from 5 to 30
years (April 13, 2012; 77 FR 22267-22278), and in 2013, we issued a
Final Rule to extend the maximum term for programmatic eagle permits to
30 years, subject to a recurring 5-year review process throughout the
life of the permit (December 9, 2013; 78 FR 73704-78725).
PG&E's power lines have resulted in eagle mortality due to
electrocution and collision. Furthermore, infrastructure associated
with electric and hydroelectric energy generation requires long-term
O&M, pipeline, and utility line modernization and replacement to
produce and deliver reliable and safe energy to PG&E customers. Some
O&M activities occur in eagle nesting habitat where there is a
potential to disturb nesting eagles.
Scope of EIS
PG&E's ECP serves as the foundation of the permit application. As
such, all alternatives considered in the EIS should conform to the
permit issuance criteria for programmatic eagle take permits under the
Eagle Act as required in 50 CFR 22.26(f)(1-6).
The draft EIS will identify and analyze direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to several
resource areas, including biological resources, public utilities, air
quality, noise, water resources, cultural resources, socioeconomics,
and climate change. We will also consider evaluation of additional
resource areas if issues of concern specific to the proposed action are
identified during the public scoping process. The purpose of the public
scoping process for the EIS is to determine relevant issues that will
influence the scope of the environmental analysis, including potential
alternatives, and the extent to which those issues and impacts will be
analyzed in the EIS. We will evaluate a minimum of three alternatives.
Applicant's Proposal
PG&E has requested a programmatic eagle take permit for incidental
take of bald and golden eagles associated with O&M activities in the
Plan Area, as described in the ECP, for a term of 30 years. Specific
activities covered under the ECP would include otherwise lawful
activities that have the potential to kill eagles or disturb them to
the extent that nests are abandoned or eagle productivity is decreased,
as well as avoidance and minimization measures to reduce these impacts.
The ECP describes:
(1) Eagle collision with or electrocution by PG&E's existing
distribution and transmission lines and conductors within the Plan
Area;
(2) Operation and maintenance of PG&E's electrical system,
including inspection and patrols (aerial and ground), routine
maintenance and repair, vegetation management (including tree pruning
and removal with the right of way), and replacement or upgrades of
existing power lines and infrastructure. This activity would apply to
all power lines in the Plan Area (141,200 miles of distribution lines
and 18,600 miles of transmission lines) and related infrastructure;
(3) Operation and maintenance of PG&E's hydroelectric system,
including the associated electric system, recreation facility
maintenance, log boom/buoy/safety marker maintenance, intake tunnel
clearing, and repair of weirs and gages. This activity would apply to
all facilities in the Plan Area, including 68 existing powerhouses, a
pumped storage facility, and nearly 100 reservoirs;
(4) Continued implementation of migratory bird and eagle take-
reduction measures, including, but not limited to:
(a) Adoption of avian-safe construction design standards;
(b) Proactive and reactive bird-safe power pole retrofits;
(c) Bird nest protection best management practices during
vegetation management activities and other routine or project work;
(d) Bird flight diverter effectiveness studies;
(e) Targeted management at hydroelectric facilities; and
(f) Pre-construction nesting bird surveys when required for project
work.
(5) Monitoring to validate the estimated amount of disturbance take
and the number of fatalities associated with PG&E's existing
infrastructure and to evaluate the effectiveness of the conservation
measures at reducing eagle take. Monitoring efforts would generally
include:
(a) Monitoring of eagle nests located throughout PG&E's
hydroelectric system, as well as those discovered during inspections,
patrols, and vegetation management activities; and
(b) Monitoring eagle fatalities during inspections, patrols, and
vegetation management actions.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other governmental agencies, the scientific community, Tribes,
industry, or any other interested party on this notice. We will
consider these comments in developing the draft EIS.
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed above in ADDRESSES. Before including your address, phone number,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--might be made publicly available at any time. While you
can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Scoping Meetings
See DATES for the date(s) and time(s) of our public meeting(s). The
primary purpose of these meetings and public comment period is to
provide the public with a general understanding of the background of
the proposed action and to solicit suggestions and information on the
scope of issues and alternatives we should consider when drafting the
EIS. Oral and written comments will be accepted at the meetings. An
interpreter and/or court reporter will be present when deemed
necessary. Comments can also be submitted by methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Once the draft EIS and proposed ECP are complete and
made available for review, there will be additional opportunity for
public comment on the content of these documents.
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meetings should contact the Pacific Southwest
Region's Migratory Bird Office using one of the methods listed above in
ADDRESSES as soon as possible. In order to allow sufficient time to
process requests, please make contact no later than one week before the
public meeting. Information regarding this proposed action is available
in alternative formats upon request.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 668a of the Eagle Act (16
U.S.C. 668-668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 40 CFR 1506.6,
and 40 CFR 1508.22).
[[Page 24958]]
Dated: April 23, 2015.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2015-10067 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P