Credit: USGS Post-Hurricane Isaac Coastal Oblique Aerial Photographs Collected along the Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana barrier islands; 2012.
In the early 1980s, Congress recognized that certain actions and programs of the Federal Government have historically subsidized and encouraged development on coastal barriers, resulting in the loss of natural resources; threats to human life, health, and property; and the expenditure of millions of tax dollars each year. To remove the federal incentive to develop these areas, the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) of 1982 and subsequent amendments designated relatively undeveloped coastal barriers along the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Great Lakes, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico coasts as part of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS), and made these areas ineligible for most new federal expenditures and financial assistance. CBRA encourages the conservation of hurricane prone, biologically rich coastal barriers by restricting federal expenditures that encourage development, such as federal flood insurance. Areas within the CBRS can be developed provided that private developers or other non-federal parties bear the full cost.
Department Reinstates Long-Standing Interpretation of CBRA for Shoreline Stabilization Projects
The Department of the Interior (Department) has reinstated its long-standing interpretation under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) as it relates to certain federally-funded shoreline stabilization projects. The Department, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, will once again advise federal agencies that sand from within the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may not be used to nourish beaches located outside of the CBRS under the exception for “nonstructural projects for shoreline stabilization that are designed to mimic, enhance, or restore a natural stabilization system” (16 U.S.C § 3505(a)(6)(G)). This decision is based on a July 14, 2021 legal interpretation of the CBRA exception and reaffirms a position the Department held on this matter from 1994-2019. Federal agencies may contact their local Ecological Services field office to determine how this interpretation will affect specific projects. Additional information is available in a Frequently Asked Questions document.
New Report about Impacts of Sediment Management on Coastal Barrier Systems
On June 2, 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a joint report on the impacts of sediment removal from and placement in coastal barrier systems. The report contains a comprehensive summary of the available scientific literature on the impacts of sediment management actions (e.g., dredging and beach nourishment) within coastal barrier systems. Barrier islands play a key role in storm protection for coastal communities and infrastructure and serve as critical habitats for many coastal and marine species. Sediment management actions are typically done for hazard mitigation such as erosion prevention and flood control. The report provides resource managers with valuable information they can use to evaluate sediment management practices and the effects they might have on coastal barrier systems, including: impacts to coastal sediment supply, seafloor habitats, beach habitats, fish and other marine species, and long-term coastal resilience along the U.S. coasts. Additional information is available in a news release and Frequently Asked Questions.
Service Sends Updated Coastal Barrier Resources System Maps to Congress for Units in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Florida
The Service has submitted to Congress seven draft revised maps for John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) units located in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Florida. Five of these maps reflect the Service’s final recommended changes to units in Okaloosa and Walton Counties, Florida, and Beaufort and Charleston Counties, South Carolina, following a comprehensive review. Two of these maps reflect minor and technical corrections to units in Walton County, Florida, and Onslow County, North Carolina, to address errors identified by the Service in recent years. These revised CBRS maps will only take effect if they are adopted through legislation enacted by Congress. Learn more.
Studies Examine CBRA’s Effectiveness in Saving Money and Reducing Development
CBRA provides landscape-level conservation benefits for fish, wildlife, and plant resources by reducing the intensity of development. A 2007 U.S. Government Accountability Office report reviewed the extent to which development has occurred in CBRS units and the extent to which federal agencies provided financial assistance within CBRS units. This report found that about 97% of all CBRS units remained undeveloped or experienced minimal development. A 2019 study published in the Journal of Coastal Research analyzed the economic benefits from CBRA and found that CBRA reduced federal coastal disaster expenditures by $9.5 billion between 1989 and 2013, and forecasts that additional savings will range between $11 and $108 billion by 2068 (in 2016 dollars). Furthermore, a study published through PLOS ONE in 2020 evaluated the effectiveness of CBRA in discouraging urban development on coastal barriers, and found that CBRA has been successful in its intention of decreasing development rates and densities of hazard prone coastal areas.
CBRA Guidance Following Coastal Storms
After a Presidentially-declared disaster, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal agencies make expenditures and provide financial assistance to help communities recover and rebuild. Most federal funding for disaster relief is prohibited within the CBRS, with some exceptions (including certain emergency actions). Helpful information is available on our website, including: the CBRS mapper, GIS data, CBRS in/out documentation, a CBRA consultation fact sheet, and additional information about the CBRA consultations process. For assistance, please contact the local FWS Ecological Services Field Office.