|
|
445 FW 1 |
New Date: October
23, 2007 Series: Law
Enforcement Part 445:
Searches, Seizures, Detention, Arrests, and Evidence Originating Office:
Office of Law Enforcement |
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1.1 What is the purpose
of this chapter?
This chapter:
A. Provides Service officers with guidance on
searches and seizures,
B. Describes Constitutional guarantees that
protect people in the United States from unreasonable searches and seizures,
and
C. Describes the authority Service officers have
when collecting evidence or seizing items connected with a violation of a law
or regulation we enforce.
1.2 What are the
Constitutional guarantees related to search and seizure that Service officers
should know about? The
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution gives people the right to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and
seizures.
1.3 What are the
statutory authorities and provisions for search and seizure?
A. The African Elephant Conservation Act. This statute gives
Service officers the same search and seizure authority as the Endangered Species
Act (see section 1.3E below) (16 U.S.C. 4224(e)).
B. The Airborne Hunting Act. This statute
authorizes Service officers to search with or without a warrant (16 U.S.C. 742j-1(d)).
C. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. This statute
authorizes Service officers to search with or without a warrant (16 U.S.C. 668b(a)).
D. The Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Act. This statute
authorizes Service officers to search with a warrant, but it is silent on the
issue of searches without a warrant (16 U.S.C. 690e(a)).
E. The Endangered Species Act of 1973. This statute
authorizes Service officers to “detain for inspection and inspect any package,
crate, or other container, including its contents, and all accompanying
documents, upon importation or exportation. . . . Such
person . . . may execute and serve any arrest warrant, search warrant, or other
warrant or civil or criminal process . . . [and] may search and seize, with or
without a warrant, as authorized by law” (16 U.S.C. 1540(e)(3)).
F. The Lacey Act Amendments of 1988 (16 U.S.C. 3375(b)):
(1) Authorizes Service officers to “…search and
seize, with or without a warrant, in accordance with any guidelines which may
be issued by the Attorney General . . . [and to] execute and serve any
subpoena, arrest warrant, search warrant issued in accordance with rule 41 of
the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or other warrant of civil or criminal
process issued by any officer or court of competent jurisdiction for
enforcement of this chapter.”
(2) This statute also specifies that (a Service
officer) “. . . in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, may detain
for inspection and inspect any vessel, vehicle, aircraft, or other conveyance
or any package, crate, or other container, including its contents, upon the
arrival of such conveyance or container in the United States or the customs
waters of the United States from any point outside the United States or such
customs waters, or, if such conveyance or container is being used for
exportation purposes, prior to departure from the United States or the customs
waters of the United States. Such person may also inspect and demand the
production of any documents and permits required by the country of natal
origin, birth, or reexport of the fish or wildlife.”
G. The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. This statute
authorizes Service officers to search with or without a warrant (16 U.S.C. 1377(d)).
H. The Migratory Bird Hunting Stamp Act. This statute gives
Service officers the same search authority as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 718f).
I. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This statute authorizes
Service officers to search with a search warrant. (16 U.S.C. 706).
J. The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997. This
statute authorizes Service officers to search with a warrant (16 U.S.C. 668dd(g)).
K. The Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of
1998.
This statute gives Service officers the same search and seizure authority as
the Endangered Species Act (see section 1.3E above) (16 U.S.C. 5305a(e)).
L. The Upper Mississippi River Wildlife and
Fish Refuge Act.
This statute authorizes Service officers to search with a warrant (16 U.S.C. 727(a)).
1.4 What terms do you
need to know to understand this chapter?
A. Affiant. Person who makes an affidavit.
B. Affidavit. A written declaration
made under oath before an authorized officer.
C. Curtilage. The curtilage is the area that protects
the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a person’s dwelling place
and the privacies of life. Areas immediately appurtenant to a dwelling place
may be considered curtilage. Such areas are generally enclosed in a way that
indicates their connection to a dwelling. The Fourth Amendment protects this
area against unreasonable searches.
D. Probable Cause. Probable cause is when
an officer can objectively deduce from a set of facts that a person has
committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Probable cause for a
search is established when facts are sufficiently strong to lead a reasonable,
prudent person to believe that evidence of a crime is probably located in the
place to be searched.
E. Property Seizure. A
seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interference with an
individual’s ownership interest in that property. A seizure does
not include detention for inspection or refusal of wildlife items that are
entering or leaving the United States at the border or functional equivalent of
the border.
F. Search. A search is any Government intrusion
into an area in which there would be a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Courts use a two-prong test to determine whether a person has a reasonable
expectation of privacy:
(1) The individual must exhibit an actual
subjective expectation of privacy, and
(2) Society must be prepared to grant that
expectation as objectively reasonable.
G. Service officer. Service officer means
any Service special agent, wildlife inspector, refuge officer, or any other officer
authorized to enforce Service statutes and regulations through delegated
authority (e.g., through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA), and Deputy Game Warden Commission).
H. Service law enforcement
officer. A Service law enforcement officer means any Service special
agent, refuge officer, or any other armed officer authorized to enforce Service
statutes and regulations through delegated authority (e.g., MOU, MOA, and
Deputy Game Warden Commission).
1.5 How does the
Service determine whether or not a search and seizure
of property is reasonable?
A. Generally, for searches and seizures to be
reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, they must:
(1) Be supported by probable cause, and
(2) Authorized by warrants that describe with
reasonable precision any evidence or property to be seized.
B. Under certain circumstances, there are
exceptions to the warrant requirements for some types of searches and seizures.
Other types of lesser intrusions do not require probable cause. We describe
these circumstances in sections 1.15
through 1.25 of
this chapter.
1.6 What violations
related to searches and seizures should officers be aware of?
A. It is a violation of 18 U.S.C. (Crimes and
Criminal Procedure) for any person to:
(1) Forcibly assault, resist, oppose, prevent,
impede, intimidate, or interfere with any person authorized to serve a search
warrant and to make seizures under a search warrant. Penalties are more severe
if the person uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (18 U.S.C. 111).
(2) Knowingly destroy, damage, waste, dispose of,
or remove property to prevent its seizure (18 U.S.C. 2232(a)).
(3) Forcibly rescue or dispossess, or attempt to
rescue or dispossess, property after it has been lawfully seized (18 U.S.C. 2233).
B. It is a violation of 18 U.S.C. for any officer
to:
(1) Willfully exceed his/her/their authority, or to
exercise it with unnecessary severity, when executing a search warrant (18 U.S.C. 2234).
(2) Procure a search warrant maliciously and
without probable cause (18
U.S.C. 2235).
(3) Search a private dwelling without a warrant or
to maliciously and without reasonable cause search any building or property.
This subsection does not apply to an officer when making a lawful arrest or
conducting a consent search (18 U.S.C. 2236).
1.7 What are warrants? A warrant:
A. Can be either a search warrant or a property
seizure warrant.
B. Should designate the primary Service officer
executing the warrant and any other authorized officer of the United States who
may execute the warrant.
C. Refers to the affidavit(s) that supports it
and states the name of the affiant. The facts constituting probable cause to
support the issuance of a warrant are in the affidavit (also see section 1.9C).
D. Commands the authorized United States
officer(s) to search the person or place named within a specified period of time not to exceed 10 days.
E. Designates the Magistrate Judge or other
issuing official to whom the warrant must be returned.
F. Describes:
(1) The places to be searched, and
(2) The things to be seized with enough precision
that anyone could identify them with reasonable effort. The descriptions may be
on the face of the warrant, or in attachments that must be incorporated into
the warrant by reference at the time the officer swears to the affidavit.
Officers do not need to describe contraband in great detail,
but they should thoughtfully identify and describe categories of tangible
evidence, including as many categories as the facts support (e.g., wildlife,
documents, photographs, computers, etc.). In some Districts, seizures of
computers require specific language related to securing, copying, and returning
computers.
1.8 When and where does
a Service officer obtain a warrant?
A. When to Obtain a Warrant. A warrant is the best
assurance that a search/seizure will be considered reasonable. Service officers
must obtain a search or seizure warrant unless one is clearly not required.
Evidence seized under authority of a valid warrant is usually admitted in
court.
B. Where to Obtain a Warrant. Service officers
obtain a search or seizure warrant from a Federal Magistrate Judge or U.S.
District Court Judge in the court district where the property is located.
Although a judge of a State court of record in that
judicial district may also issue a search warrant, such a warrant is only
available if an officer can show that a Federal Judge was not reasonably
available. Service officers should seek counsel before resorting to a State Judge, and should only turn to State judges as a last
resort.
1.9 How does a Service
officer obtain a warrant? The Service officer prepares and submits the warrant
documents to the issuing authority, normally a U.S. Magistrate Judge. The
warrant documents consist of a warrant, application, and affidavit. The
affidavit is attached to the application. The officer should write the warrant
number on each page of the warrant documents, and the judge may require the
officer to initial or sign and date each page.
A. Warrant. The warrant is a one-page Federal court
form which, when issued (signed and stamped) by a U.S. Magistrate Judge, gives
the Service officer authority to search or seize property.
B. Application for a Warrant. The Application for a
Warrant is a Federal court form similar in appearance
to the warrant. The application must:
(1) Have the affidavit attached, and
(2) Accompany the search warrant when it is
presented to the U.S. Magistrate Judge.
C. Affidavit The affidavit states
detailed and specific facts constituting probable cause to search/seize
property. It is attached to and incorporated by reference into the
application.
D. Hearsay. The affiant can partially or totally
base probable cause for a warrant on the observations made and information
gathered by other individuals, called “hearsay,” if the affiant can establish
the competency and reliability of the information. The affiant must also
describe in the affidavit how he/she/they acquired the hearsay information, but
the affidavit does not have to disclose the informant’s identity. When an
affiant uses hearsay information, special rules apply for testing the
competency of the evidence. Under these rules, the affidavit may not merely
assert that the Service officer has “reliable information from a credible
person,” but must contain enough specific facts to permit the Magistrate Judge
to determine that:
(1) The informant is a generally reliable
person.
This requirement is satisfied if:
(a) The informant holds a trustworthy and reliable
position (such as another law enforcement officer),
(b) The officer has determined the informant’s
reliability by questioning,
(c) The informant incriminated himself/herself/themself
by giving the information, or
(d) The informant gave reliable information in the
past to the Service officer or other law enforcement officers, and
(2) The informant obtained his/her/their
information in a manner that justifies relying on it. This requirement is
satisfied if the informant’s information:
(a) Comes from his/her/their personal
observations,
(b) Includes a number of precise details that
suggest he/she/they personally observed the facts and
that the information is more than rumor, or
(c) Is corroborated by other evidence.
E. Consultation and Review. As early in the
process as possible and before applying for a search warrant, if practical,
Service officers should consult with an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA)
and request their review of the affidavit to ensure it contains sufficient
probable cause to obtain a warrant. In some districts, the Magistrate Judge (or
other issuing authority) will not accept an affidavit for a search warrant
without the concurrence of an AUSA.
F. Issuance. A search warrant may be issued only on the basis of an affidavit(s) sworn to before a U.S.
Magistrate Judge (or other issuing authority) that establishes probable cause
and that describes the place to be searched or seized and the grounds for the
search or seizure. The judge will require the affiant to appear personally and
may examine him/her/them and any witnesses he/she/they may produce under oath.
The judge may use a court reporter or recording equipment to record such
proceedings, which will be included as part of the affidavit for the search
warrant. Under limited circumstances, judges may authorize search warrant applications
and approvals over the telephone.
1.10 How do Service
officers execute warrants?
A. General Rules.
(1) The Service officer named in the warrant and
other authorized officers may execute the warrant.
(2) The time during which the warrant may be
served will be specified on the warrant, but is
usually between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. local time. If reasonable cause is
shown, the issuing authority may specifically authorize on the warrant that it
be served at any time, day or night. A daytime search
may extend into the night, provided the Service officers executing the warrant
act reasonably and do not continue the search as a form of harassment.
Officers may serve warrants on any day of the week.
(3) Officers must execute search warrants as soon
as practical, but in all cases within 10 days of issuance. If an officer does
not execute a warrant or obtain a renewal within those 10 days, then it is void
and cannot be renewed. At that point the officer must file a new affidavit and
get a new search warrant.
(4) While searching for the property described in a
warrant, a Service officer may also seize property related to a different crime
but not described in the warrant, but only if the officer lawfully observes the
item and the item is unlawful on its face. For example, an officer may not
seize a television set not listed in a warrant where its illegality only became
known when the officer checked a stolen property database for the serial number
from the back of the TV.
(5) When a Service officer seizes
property/evidence under a warrant, the officer must either:
(a) Give a copy of the warrant (without the
application or affidavit) and a receipt for the property taken to the person
from whom, or from whose premises, the property/evidence was taken, or
(b) If the person is not present, leave a copy of
the warrant (without the application or affidavit) and a copy of the property
receipt at the place from which the property was taken. (See 445 FW 3, Evidence and sections 1.12 and 1.19 – 1.23 for
more information on seized property.)
B. Execution of Search Warrant on Premises.
(1) A Service officer should attempt to execute a
warrant when the owner, resident, or other responsible person is present at the
premises being searched. The Service officer should announce that he/she/they
is a Federal officer and that he/she/they has a search
warrant. If the officer receives no response after such announcement or if the
officer is refused admittance, the officer may break into the premises.
(2) The search may not commence until the search
warrant has been properly served. If more than one Service officer executes the
warrant, the other officer(s) do not need to enter the premises by the same
entrance as the officer serving the warrant.
(3) A Service officer may stay on the premises
only during the time reasonably necessary to search for and seize the property
described in the warrant. The search should be as brief as is reasonably
possible.
(4) A search warrant does not permit a search of
all the people present during the search unless it specifies such a search. If
there is reason to suspect that people on the premises are carrying items that
reasonably could be objects of the search warrant, the officer may detain and
search them to determine whether they are concealing items covered by the
warrant.
C. Return of the Warrant. After conducting the
search, the Service officer must promptly return the original warrant with a list of all items seized to the U.S. Magistrate
Judge or other issuing authority. The officer may list seized items in
the space provided on the back of the warrant or complete and attach a Seized
Property Receipt (Form 3-155 or other document) as an inventory of
property/evidence taken, to the U.S. Magistrate Judge or other issuing
authority. See 445 FW 3.14,
Evidence, and sections
1.12 and 1.19 –
1.23 for more information on seized property and receipts.
1.11 What may Service
officers seize?
Service officers may seize the following items when they find them during a
lawful search (Rule 41, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure):
A. Contraband or Fruits of Crime. These are items that
are unlawful to have, such as narcotics, certain firearms, or illegally taken
or traded wildlife. If a warrant does not specifically list the contraband, the
incriminating nature of the item(s) must be readily apparent.
B. Instruments of Crime. This is property
designed or intended for use or that is or was used as the means of committing
a crime (i.e., weapons, vehicles, burglary tools, game tracking and spotting
tools, specialized cages, and wildlife handling equipment).
C. Evidence of Crime. Any item that
constitutes evidence of a crime is subject to seizure. However, officers may
only seize items or property that appears reasonably necessary to aid in an
apprehension or conviction. The item must appear to be related to the crime
under investigation.
1.12 Does a Service
officer need to itemize and provide a receipt when seizing property?
A. Yes. See 445 FW 3, Evidence, for
detailed information about itemizing and providing receipts for seized
property.
B. Whenever officers conduct a search but do not
seize property, they must leave some documentation with the person involved
that explains there was a search but no seizure. Officers should ask the owner
of the property that was searched to sign the documentation. If possible, the
owner should sign with another officer witnessing the signature. If the owner
will not sign, the officer should document the refusal to sign. Officers should
keep one copy of the documentation and leave one with the person who signed it.
(1) If officers conducted the search with a
warrant, they should leave a copy of the warrant certifying that they took
nothing from the premises.
(2) If they conducted the search without a warrant
and took nothing, officers should prepare a certificate that, for example,
says:
This is to certify that
on {date} at {time} officers of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Department of
the Interior, conducted a search of the premises
at {address}. I certify
that nothing was removed from my custody
by Service officers of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.”
1.13 What is the
exclusionary rule?
The exclusionary rule says that evidence Federal or State officers obtain by
unreasonable (illegal) searches and seizures cannot be introduced in a criminal
proceeding against the defendant.
A. Extent of Exclusions. Generally, all
improperly obtained evidence is excluded. This includes all evidence obtained
by exploiting improperly obtained evidence (i.e., “fruit of the poisonous
tree”). The fruit is any information, object, or testimony that officers
uncover or obtain, directly or indirectly, through the illegally seized
evidence—items and information that officers would not have obtained if not for
the initial illegally obtained evidence.
B. Standing. Because the exclusionary rule is an
attempt to effectuate the guarantees of the Fourth Amendment, only defendants
whose Fourth Amendment rights have been violated are permitted to benefit from
the rule’s protections. Courts have found that, “A person who is aggrieved by
an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging
evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not
had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.” In order
to claim the protection of the Fourth Amendment, “a defendant must
demonstrate that he personally has an expectation of privacy in the place
searched and that his expectation is reasonable . . .”
C. Non-criminal Proceedings. Many courts are
applying the exclusionary rule to non-criminal proceedings when the Government
imposes some penalty. For example, the State of Pennsylvania applied it in an
automobile forfeiture proceeding for transporting narcotics. Service officers
should assume that the exclusionary rule applies in Service civil penalty and
forfeiture proceedings.
1.14 What do Service
officers need to know about the Service-enforced statutes and warrantless
searches?
A. Most of the Service-enforced statutes in section 1.3 have
specific language authorizing Service officers to execute search warrants. Some
of these laws, however, are silent when it comes to specifically authorizing
searches without warrants, as are most other statutes that outline the powers
of Federal officers. In Aiuppa v.
United States, 338 F.2d 146 (10th Cir. 1964), the 10th Circuit held that
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act implicitly withheld power to make warrantless
searches based on probable cause and only authorized searches based on a
warrant, incidental to arrest, or by consent.
B. Since the Aiuppa
decision, Congress amended many Service statutes to authorize warrantless
searches. Some Service statutes provide authority to search with or without
warrant, as authorized by law. The “authorized by law” provision means
that searches must comply not only with the Constitution and Federal statutes,
but also to the way the courts have interpreted these provisions.
1.15 What circumstances
may call for a warrantless search? Under certain circumstances, there are
exceptions to warrant requirements. These may include, but are not limited to:
A. Searches incident to arrest (section 1.16).
B. Exigent circumstances (section 1.17).
C. Consent searches (section 1.18).
D. Vehicle searches (section 1.19).
E. Inventory searches (section 1.20).
F. Border Searches (section 1.21).
1.16 When may Service
officers conduct a search incident to an arrest?
A. General Rule. In
the course of an arrest, a Service law enforcement officer may search
the arrested person without a warrant for contraband, weapons, and other
evidence. This guideline applies both to felonies and misdemeanors where the
officer takes the accused into physical custody. The law allows a search
incident to an arrest to protect the arresting officer and prevent the defendant
from escaping, harming himself/herself/themself or others, or destroying
evidence.
B. Arrest Must Be Lawful. If the arrest is
unlawful for any reason, the search incident to the arrest is also unlawful,
and any fruits of such a search are inadmissible in court. Such fruits include
physical evidence obtained as a result of the search, confessions or
incriminating statements made by the accused while illegally detained,
and leads obtained during this time.
C. Scope of Search.
(1) A Service law enforcement officer may search
the arrested person, everything in his/her/their immediate possession, and the
immediate area into which the arrested person might reach to gain possession of
a weapon or evidence that the person could destroy.
(a) The search may not extend to other rooms or
even other areas within the same room unless this “area of reach” rule is met.
For example, when an officer arrests a person in an automobile, the officer may
search the glove compartment or under the seat or backseat, but a search of the
trunk is probably not permissible.
(b) However, the Supreme Court, in Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990), upheld a detective’s
protective sweep of a basement because the suspect had emerged from the
basement, and the officer had a reasonable suspicion that someone else was down
there. The Court found that, “The Fourth Amendment permits a properly limited
protective sweep in conjunction with an in-home arrest when the searching
officer possesses a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts
that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the
arrest scene.”
(2) It is reasonable for the Service law
enforcement officer to make a full body search for weapons and evidence
incident to an arrest regardless of the nature of the crime for which the
arrest was made. The rationale for such a search is to prevent the person
arrested from bringing weapons or other contraband into the officer’s vehicle.
Such searches may be conducted even if the officer does not believe the
arrested person has a weapon or an opportunity to destroy evidence. See section 1.22 for
information about intrusive searches.
(3) Issuing a Violation Notice (Form 3-219) is not
the same as an arrest. Service officers must not conduct a search incident to
arrest based merely on the issuance of a Violation Notice or other citation.
(4) Because a search made incident to a lawful
arrest must be limited in scope, Service officers should, if possible, obtain a
search warrant at the same time as the arrest warrant if they anticipate the
need to search the subject’s premises. When it is not possible to get a
simultaneous search warrant or when an officer must make an arrest without a
search warrant, officers should apply for a search warrant after the arrest.
While one officer obtains the search warrant, another officer may remain on the
premises to guard against any destruction of evidence.
(5) A search made incident to an arrest must be
made at the same time and place as the arrest, unless circumstances surrounding
a particular arrest justify substantial delay. For example, substantial
delay may be justified where a search is indicated and appropriate personnel
are not immediately available to conduct the search, such as a female Service
officer to search a female suspect.
D. Engineered and Pretext Arrests.
(1) If officers maneuver or “engineer” an arrest
to take place at a certain place so they can search those premises, the search
may be invalid. Service officers should not deliberately delay making an arrest
so that they will have an opportunity to search for other items (for example,
waiting until the accused enters a car to arrest him/her/them so that officers
can search the car).
(2) Courts may invalidate a search incident to an
arrest if an officer deliberately made the arrest as a pretext for a search
(for example, a traffic offense arrest as a pretext for a search of the car).
1.17 When do exigent circumstances
justify a warrantless search?
A. General Rule. If probable cause is
present, Service officers may immediately search for and seize evidence that
they reasonably believe will be destroyed or removed to another location before
they can secure a search warrant. The Supreme Court recognized that law
enforcement officers encounter such exigent circumstances and ruled that where
probable cause exists, warrantless searches are necessary to prevent the loss
of evidence.
B. Hot Pursuit. Service officers may
pursue a suspect into private premises if they have probable cause to arrest
the suspect for a serious crime and there are exigent circumstances. The
pursuit must be immediate and continuous from the point the subject is
encountered. Misdemeanor violations are not considered “serious” crimes for
this exception to the warrant requirement. Such circumstances must be
documented as soon as is reasonably possible after the pursuit.
1.18 When may Service
officers conduct a consent search?
A. General Rule. Service officers may
conduct warrantless searches with consent. Probable cause is not required for a
consent search. When a person consents to a search by a Service officer, he/she/they
waives his/her/their Fourth Amendment right of protection from search without a
warrant. However, courts will carefully examine any waiver of that
Constitutional right. Before courts will admit evidence discovered as a result of a consent search, the Government must show by
“clear and convincing” evidence that the person freely and voluntarily gave
consent.
B. Consent.
(1) Consent to search must be voluntary.
(2) Consent should be in writing (see section 1.18E below
for more information).
(3) The person must give consent without express or
implied duress, coercion, or threats.
(4) If a Service officer claims the right to
search (by showing a warrant, for example), any subsequent consent is not
voluntary.
(5) Whether or not a person is voluntarily
consenting is a question to be determined from all the circumstances,
including, but not limited to:
(a) The time of day (e.g., a search conducted at 3
a.m. may be considered differently than a search conducted at 12 p.m.). The
courts review time issues based on all of the facts
and circumstances known to the officer at the time of the search.
(b) The number of Service officers present,
(c) Whether or not the subject had been arrested,
(d) Whether the officer advised the subject that he/she/they
had a right to refuse consent, and
(e) Whether the person had the capacity to
meaningfully consent to a search.
(6) If a person is under arrest when he/she/they
consents to a search of his/her/their premises or vehicle, the courts often
rule that the person did not give consent voluntarily because his/her/their
concurrence was induced by inherently coercive circumstances.
C. Authority to Consent.
(1) A person in sole control of the premises or
effects has a right and the authority to consent to a search of them.
(2) Generally, a third person can, in the absence
of the subject, consent to a search of the premises and items over which he/she/they
has control, even if the premises or items are jointly controlled or owned. If
the subject is present and objects, a third person’s consent is not valid.
(3) A landlord may have a property interest in the
premises occupied by the tenant, but he/she/they has no right to joint access
or control and cannot consent to a search of the property that he/she/they
rents to another. Similarly, a hotel clerk cannot consent to a search of
a guest’s room. However, once the tenant or hotel guest checks out, abandons
the premises, or is evicted, the landlord or hotel clerk may consent to the
search.
(4) An employee without managerial or agency
powers cannot consent to a search of the property owned/managed by his/her/their
employer. In corporate or business situations, Service officers should obtain
consent from the highest ranking official on the premises. For a search of
company records, it is sufficient to get the consent of the office manager who
keeps those records under his/her/their control and supervision.
(5) A partner in a business enterprise may give a
valid consent against the other partners.
(6) An employer’s consent to a search of business
premises is valid against an employee, but the consent does not cover that part
of the employee’s desk, locker, etc. reserved exclusively for storing the
employee’s personal possessions.
(7) If both members of a married
couple are present and one objects to a search of their common dwelling, the
officer may not conduct a search without a warrant. In the absence of one
spouse, the other spouse may not give consent to search the spouse's suitcase,
desk, dresser, or other object or place exclusively owned or controlled by the
spouse. If
the subject previously refused consent to search, it is doubtful that the
spouse’s consent is valid. A minor child or other
dependent has no ownership right in the premises other than that derived from
the parents and cannot give valid consent to search against the parents.
(8) One spouse cannot give consent to search a
business premises under the control of the other spouse, even when that
business is located within the home, unless the consenting spouse has been
given authority by the controlling spouse. Such authority cannot be implied
from the marital relationship alone.
(9) A homeowner may consent to a search against a
temporary, nonpaying guest staying in the dwelling. The host’s consent may not
be valid if the part of the home being searched is set aside for a long-term
guest’s exclusive use, or if the search is of an item, such as a suitcase, that
is exclusively owned by the guest.
D. Scope of Consent.
(1) The consent should be as clear and explicit as
possible.
(2) The person giving consent can restrict the
search to specific objects or to only a specific part of the premises.
(3) The person may revoke consent at any time
before the search is complete. A search must stop when the person revokes
consent. However, Service officers may retain all evidence found before the
revocation. Officers may use the information obtained to establish probable
cause for a later warrant or an immediate arrest and incidental search of the
people on the premises.
E. Written Consent. Service officers
should obtain consent for a search in writing. When the person gives consent
but refuses to sign the Consent to Search Form (Form 3-342), the officer should
complete the form except for the signature. The officer should note on the form
that the person either read it himself/herself/themself or someone read it to
him/her/them. The officer should record the exact language used by the person
to give consent. If the person giving consent limits the search in any way,
such as restricting it to specific objects or to only part of the premises, the
officer should record the limitations on the form. If the officer obtains
verbal consent but does not use the form or make a written record at the time, he/she/they
should clearly document the consent in the investigative report.
1.19 When may Service
officers search of a vehicle (not at a border)?
A. General Rule.
(1) If practical, Service officers should obtain a
warrant to search a vehicle. The term “vehicle” in this section includes, but
is not limited to, automobiles, cars, trucks, trailers, mobile homes, boats, all-terrain
vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles, and airplanes.
(2) The courts have ruled that law enforcement
officers may search a “mobile conveyance” or vehicle without a warrant if the
officers have established probable cause to believe the vehicle contains
contraband or evidence of a crime (see subsection 19.A(3) below for information
about “mobile”). Once officers establish probable cause, they can search the
vehicle immediately at the site where they seized it, or they can search later
where it is impounded for safe keeping. The standard for probable cause to
search a vehicle is the same as for obtaining a search warrant (see section 1.4D).
(3) A vehicle is mobile if it is moving or can be
moved. If the vehicle cannot move or be moved, the “mobile” exception to the
search warrant requirement does not apply.
B. Seized Vehicles.
(1) If a Service officer seizes a vehicle used in
a crime (for example, a vehicle used to transport illegal wildlife) as
evidence, the vehicle is subject to a later, more careful examination without a
warrant like any other lawfully seized item.
(2) Service officers must take complete
inventories of all seized or impounded vehicles and their contents as part of
routine procedure (see section 1.20).
(Also see 445 FW 3.6 – 3.12.)
Such warrantless searches conducted to inventory seized vehicles have been
upheld by the courts.
C. Abandoned Vehicles. Like other abandoned
property, Service officers may seize and search an abandoned vehicle without a
warrant and without probable cause. A vehicle is considered abandoned
when a reasonable person coming upon the vehicle would believe the vehicle is
abandoned, considering all of the facts and
circumstances known to the person at that time.
D. Other Guidelines for Vehicles.
(1) Even if evidence justifies a vehicle search,
Service officers may not necessarily search occupants of the vehicle if they
have not been arrested (see sections 1.10B4 and 1.16A).
(2) If a Service officer has a right to search a
vehicle and the operator refuses to allow him/her/them to proceed, the officer
may use as much force as reasonable and necessary to search the vehicle under
the circumstances.
(3) Service officers may use admissions or other
events occurring between the time they stop the vehicle and the time the actual
search begins to show probable cause for a search.
(4) If officers establish probable cause to believe
a vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime, the officers may search
any area of the vehicle where the contraband or evidence may be, including all
containers and packages located in the vehicle into which that evidence could
fit (locked or unlocked). However, if officers have probable cause to believe
the contraband or evidence is only in a specific container or package within
the vehicle, they must limit the search to that container or package.
(5) The “plain view” doctrine applies to vehicles.
At night, Service officers may use anything revealed by shining a flashlight
into the car (plain view) to show probable cause for a search (see section 1.24A).
1.20 When do Service
officers conduct inventory searches of vehicles and personal property?
A. General Rule. During routine law
enforcement duties, it is common for Service officers to take lawful custody of
personal property that may not be subject to seizure (i.e., abandoned vehicles,
undeclared baggage, purses and wallets of persons
placed under arrest, etc.). An inventory search is a warrantless search of
personal property that is necessary to:
(1) Protect the personal property and its
contents,
(2) Protect those who might come
into contact with the personal property from harmful or dangerous
substances or material that might be concealed in the property, and
(3) Protect the officer and the Service from claims
of theft of, or damage to, the personal property.
B. Vehicles. The term “vehicles” in this section
includes, but is not limited to: automobiles, cars,
trucks, trailers, mobile homes, boats, all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles,
motorcycles, airplanes, and any attachment to a vehicle, such as a trailer,
camper, or camper shell.
C. Guidelines. During inventory
searches, Service officers must follow these guidelines:
(1) Service officers taking custody of personal
property must conduct a thorough inventory search of it as soon as practicable.
(2) Service officers must refuse any verbal or
written offer that promises to hold them or the Service harmless in exchange
for not completing a thorough inventory or limiting its scope.
(3) The inventory search may include closed and
locked containers and closed and locked areas of a vehicle, such as the trunk,
the glove compartment, the console, and the camper.
(4) The officers must note in the inventory any
special qualities of the property that may help protect the officers and the
Service from claims that property was damaged or stolen while in Government
custody (e.g., significant damage to a vehicle).
(5) If practicable, before forcibly opening a
locked container or area of a vehicle, the officer should attempt to unlock the
personal property with the appropriate keys, combinations, or other mechanisms.
In situations requiring force, the officer must inflict only as much damage to
the property as is necessary to open it safely and timely.
(6) The officer may record the inventory on a
Located Evidence List (Form 3-2069) or any form or document that he/she/they
finds suitable. If the officer uses a property receipt, he/she/they should note
clearly on the form “For Inventory Purposes Only.”
(7) The inventory must be detailed and consistent
with standard law enforcement practices. The nature and condition of the items
found during an inventory search and their exact location as well as the
inventory document itself, may become evidence in a subsequent criminal, civil,
or administrative proceeding.
(8) Officers must document completed inventories
in a Report of Investigation and include them as an attachment to the report.
(9) After the inventory is complete, Service
officers must conduct one of the following actions for each item on the
inventory:
(a) If officers have probable cause to believe an
item is evidence, they should seize and process the item as evidence.
(b) If an item has no evidentiary value and cannot
otherwise be lawfully retained, officers must return the item to the rightful
owner as soon as practical.
(c) If an item was seized that has no evidentiary
value, and it belongs to an incarcerated person, officers must secure the item
and return it to the person. Officers may also release the item to the
incarcerated person’s designee at any time.
(10) After the inventory is complete, Service
officers must provide a copy of the inventory document to the owner(s) of the
property.
(11) Before returning inventoried property,
officers should ask the owner of the property to make a statement that the
property is or is not in the same condition as when the Service originally took
custody. The owner may also make a statement that he/she/they has insufficient
knowledge to make such a statement. The refusal to make a statement is not
grounds for refusing to return property when its return is otherwise legally
justified or required.
1.21 May Service
officers conduct searches at the international border or at the functional
equivalent of the border? Yes. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) gives Service
officers broad authority to enforce the Act by conducting inspections of
imports to or exports from the United States. Following is guidance for
conducting inspections at international borders.
A. Purpose. International border searches are a
well-recognized and a long-established exception to the probable cause and
warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment. Conducting any search, including
border searches, must be reasonable. A warrantless border search may be
considered unreasonable depending on the degree of intrusiveness of the search.
Refuge officers may assist with international border searches when a Service
special agent or wildlife inspector requests their assistance.
B. Routine Border Search. In a routine
border search, a person entering or exiting the United States is subject to
search of luggage, contents of pockets, and purse without any suspicion at all,
for wildlife, wildlife parts or products, protected plants, documents, and any
evidence of a violation.
C. Types of Borders.
(1) Land Border. The land border is the
actual dividing line between the United States and Canada or Mexico. When a
person or object crosses that line, the authority for a border search is
established.
(2) Sea Border. The seaward boundaries
of a State are fixed by statute as the boundaries each State recognized when it
became a member of the union. States that did not set such boundaries may
extend their boundaries to 3 geographic (nautical) miles from the mean low
water mark. The mean low water mark is the line of the water on the coast,
beach, or banks at the average low tide. The area of water between the mean low
water mark and the seaward boundary of the coastal States is known as the
“territorial sea.” For bays and estuaries, a line is drawn from headland to
headland and 3 nautical miles are measured from this baseline. The sea border
is marked on nautical charts. Service officers should consult these charts if a
question arises as to whether they are within the territorial sea. United
States law is fully effective in the territorial sea, and any crime committed
in this area is committed within the United States and in the State adjacent to
the waters.
(a) Florida and Texas. Florida and Texas are
the only Gulf Coast States with a seaward boundary into the Gulf of Mexico that
extends to 9 nautical miles (3 marine leagues).
(b) Great Lakes. The boundary line in
the Great Lakes that divides Canadian and U.S. waters is on nautical charts of
the Great Lakes. This boundary line generally divides the Great Lakes in half
and is usually physically identified by a buoy line.
(3) Air Border. The air border extends
upward from the land or sea
border.
(4) Functional Equivalent of the Border (FEB). An FEB is a
location that functions like the border. The recognized FEBs are:
(a) Ocean ports where ships dock when entering the
United States from international travel,
(b) Airports where international flights land,
(c) Customs bonded warehouses,
(d) Customs bonded shipments, and
(e) Customs mail branches housed in U.S. Postal
Service facilities.
D. Inbound Border Searches. Service officers may
conduct inbound border searches only in the following conditions:
(1) The Service officer must be enforcing statutes
that allow us to conduct a search.
(2) The reasonable search is for wildlife,
merchandise made of wildlife, protected plants, and any evidence of a
violation.
(3) The officer conducts the search at the border
or the FEB.
E. Outbound Border Searches. Service officers may
conduct outbound border searches only in the following conditions:
(1) The Service officer must be enforcing statutes
that allow us to conduct a search.
(2) The reasonable search is for wildlife,
merchandise made of wildlife, protected plants, and any evidence of a
violation.
(3) There is reasonable certainty that there will
be a connection to the border or the functional equivalent of the border.
(4) The officer conducts the search at the last
practicable detention point before the export.
F. Baggage, Containers, and Conveyances. The Lacey Act and the
Endangered Species Act authorize Service officers to detain for inspection and
inspect any vessel, vehicle, aircraft, or other conveyance or any package,
crate, or other container, including its contents, and all accompanying
documents when imported or exported.
G. Pat Downs at the Border or FEB.
(1) Service law enforcement officers may conduct
pat downs. They may pat down people during inbound and outbound
searches, when applicable. The pat down search may only include the following:
(a) Patting the hands over the person’s clothed
body,
(b) Removing the person’s shoes,
(c) Lifting the pant leg or hem of a skirt a few
inches,
(d) Removing a belt,
(e) Examining or reaching into pockets,
(f) Rolling up shirtsleeves, and
(g) Removing a wig or hairpiece.
(2) A person may be subjected to a pat down search
for wildlife, wildlife parts or products, protected plants, and any evidence of
a violation.
(3) Service officers must not conduct pat
down searches for merchandise on people of the opposite sex. (They may conduct
pat down searches for weapons on people of the opposite sex, See sections 1.16C(2)
and 1.22
below.) If a Service officer of the same sex is not available, the
officer must request assistance from another agency to provide an officer of
the same sex to conduct the search.
(4) Outer garments, suit coats, jackets, handbags,
pockets, and baggage are considered containers and Service officers can search
them without any suspicion as part of a routine border search.
(5) Service officers must distinguish between a
pat down search for merchandise and a pat down search for weapons. If officers
suspect that their safety or that of others may be in danger, they may pat down
the person for weapons, regardless of the person’s gender.
H. Partial Body Searches conducted at the
Border or FEB.
Partial body searches are intrusive and require approval from the appropriate
Special Agent in Charge (SAC) or Regional Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement. See section 1.22B for
more guidance on partial body searches.
I. Body Cavity Searches Conducted at the Border
or FEB. Body
cavity searches to remove weapons, contraband, and evidence of criminal
activity may only be conducted with written consent or by a court order. See section 1.22C for
more guidance on body cavity searches.
J. Destructive Searches Conducted at the Border
or FEB.
Destructive searches are intrusive, and we require reasonable suspicion to
conduct them. See section
1.22D for more guidance on destructive searches.
K. Use of Force While Conducting a Border
Search.
(1) When working at the border or FEB, Service
officers may make reasonable requests that help them perform their duties (for
example, having travelers stand in line or instructing them where to sit or
stand while being detained for clearance).
(2) Service officers may use reasonable
force—force no greater than that which is reasonably necessary for the
purpose—to overcome resistance to a lawful search (see 442 FW 2 for Service policy
on use of force). Apart from personal searches, Service officers may physically
restrain a person during a detention only if they reasonably believe that
restraint is necessary to protect themselves or others, prevent destruction of
evidence, or prevent the person from fleeing. Nothing in this chapter prohibits
any officer from using the appropriate level of force necessary to defend
himself/herself/themself or others from an assault.
1.22 When may a Service
officer conduct intrusive searches?
A. General Rule. Partial body searches,
body cavity searches, and destructive searches are intrusive searches. Only
Service law enforcement officers may conduct partial body and destructive
searches, and only medical personnel may conduct body cavity searches. Service
law enforcement officers must obtain approval from the appropriate SAC or
Regional Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement to conduct an intrusive search.
Non-consensual body cavity searches require a court order. Officers must
submit a written report documenting the circumstances related to any intrusive
search to the appropriate SAC or Regional Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement as
soon as possible, but no later than 3 days after the search.
B. Partial Body Searches. A partial body search
is the removal of some of the clothing on a person to recover weapons,
contraband, and evidence of criminal activity that an officer reasonably
suspects is concealed on the body.
(1) Service law enforcement officers are
authorized to conduct partial body searches only with the approval of the
appropriate SAC or Regional Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement.
(2) Only clothing covering the particular
area of the body under suspicion may be removed.
(3) Officers may not touch the person during a
partial body search unless the person refuses to remove any article of clothing
or otherwise impedes the officer. If an officer thinks the person may resist
the search, they may warn him/her/them that forcible resistance to a search
violates Federal law (18
U.S.C. 111).
(4) Officers must not conduct partial body searches
of people of the opposite sex, unless they have
emergency or safety concerns. If an officer of the same sex is not available
for the search, the officer should request assistance from another agency to
provide an officer of the same sex.
(5) Officers should conduct partial body searches
in a manner and within an area or location that provides an appropriate level
of privacy and is excluded from public view.
C. Body Cavity Searches. A body cavity search
is any visual or physical intrusion into the rectal or vaginal cavity. Body
cavity searches must be conducted by medical personnel at an appropriate
medical facility. The purpose of these searches is limited to remove weapons,
contraband, and evidence of criminal activity. We require approval of the SAC
or Regional Chief of Law Enforcement for body cavity searches.
(1) Consent for a body cavity search must
be documented in writing, and officers must describe their observations
concerning the person’s maturity, intelligence, and education.
(2) Non-consensual body cavity searches
require a court order. Non-consensual body cavity searches require a decision
to proceed by the SAC or Regional Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement. After
obtaining this authorization to proceed, the Service officer must contact the
U.S. Attorney’s office and request a warrant to authorize the search.
D. Destructive Searches. A destructive search
is a search that will destroy an item(s) that an officer has reason to believe
contains weapons, contraband, and other evidence of criminal activity. We
require reasonable suspicion for destructive searches and the approval of the
SAC or Regional Chief of Law Enforcement. If practical, officers should obtain
search warrants before conducting destructive searches.
1.23 What are the
inspection and search authorities for international cargo, international mail,
and interstate commerce shipments?
A. International Cargo Inspection Authority. The Endangered Species
Act of 1973 and the Lacey Act provide the authority for the Service to detain
for inspection and inspect any package, crate, or other container, including
its contents, and all accompanying documents upon importation or exportation
within the United States and its territories. The Director delegates this
inspection authority to the Service’s Office of Law Enforcement, who further
delegates it only to Service special agents and wildlife inspectors. The legal
requirements for documentation, declaration, inspection, and clearance of
wildlife shipments are in 50 CFR Part 14.
B. International Mail. Wildlife imported
through international mail facilities must meet the same statutory and
regulatory requirements as wildlife shipped by other means.
(1) Mail includes any posted parcel, packet,
package, envelope, letter, aerogramme, box, card, or similar article or
container.
(a) Letter class mail is any mail article,
including packages, post cards, and aerogramme, mailed at the letter rate or
equivalent category of postage. Letter class mail is the international
equivalent of our domestic first-class mail.
(b) Sealed letter class mail is mail sealed against
postal inspection. Sealed letter class mail includes packages mailed at the
express rate, the highest rate of postage available.
(2) Officers may not read or allow others to read
any correspondence in letter class mail or sealed letter class mail without a
search warrant or written authorization from the sender or addressee. Officers
may not read or allow others to read any correspondence between school children
or correspondence of the blind that are mailed at other than the letter rate.
(3) Officers may not inspect mail known or
believed to contain only official documents addressed to officials of the U.S.
government; mail addressed to ambassadors and ministers (chiefs of diplomatic
missions) of foreign countries; and letter class mail known or believed to
contain only correspondence or documents addressed to diplomatic missions,
consular posts, or their officers, or to international organizations designated
under the International Organizations Act. Officers may not inspect mail that
is not letter class mail and is addressed to international organizations where
the organization has certified under its official seal that the mail contains
no prohibited articles.
(4) Inbound mail originates from foreign countries.
Service officers may not open any sealed letter class mail that appears to
contain only correspondence without a search warrant or written authorization
from the sender or addressee. Officers may inspect sealed letter class mail
when it appears to contain matter other than correspondence, provided there is
reasonable cause to suspect the presence of wildlife or protected plants.
(5) Outbound mail is domestic mail transmitted for
export by the U.S. Postal Service. A search warrant is required to inspect
sealed letter class outbound mail under the postal laws of the United States (39 U.S.C. 3623(d)).
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has specific and limited statutory
exemptions to this search warrant requirement (see 19 U.S.C. 1583).
Service officers should coordinate outbound mail inspections with the DHS.
C. Wildlife Shipments in Interstate Commerce. Service officers must
have a warrant or consent to inspect shipments in interstate commerce. They
may, however, examine the outside of the container for compliance with Lacey
Act marking and labeling requirements without a warrant.
1.24 Are there circumstances where a Service officer may observe and
obtain evidence without courts considering it a search? Yes, officers may
obtain evidence from areas where an individual has no reasonable expectation of
privacy or where evidence is obtained absent Government intrusion. The
following situations are examples:
A. Private Premises Open to Plain View. It is not unlawful for
a Service officer to merely use his/her/their natural senses to observe that
which is open to plain view, as long as the officer
has not violated the Fourth Amendment to get to where the evidence could be
plainly viewed.
(1) Whether or not officers can seize property in
plain view depends on the circumstances under which they see or seize it.
Plain view should be viewed not as an independent “exception” to the warrant
requirement, but simply as an extension of whatever the prior justification for
an officer’s access to an object may be.
(2) The seizure of property in plain view when an
officer is allowed on the premises involves no invasion of privacy and is
presumptively reasonable, assuming that there is probable cause to associate
the property with criminal activity. However, it may be an invasion of privacy if
the property is on private premises, and the officer has to
go on private property to see it.
B. Open Fields. When Service officers
enter onto open fields (not part of curtilage – see section 1.4C), their
observations are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. For example, officers
entering on hunting club property that is not part of the curtilage can make
observations leading to seizures which are covered under this open fields doctrine. The open fields doctrine applies even if
the fields are constructed as part of a commercial enterprise (e.g., a hunting
club operating for profit).
C. Abandoned Property. A Service officer may
seize property discarded by a person outside of his/her/their home or his/her/their
curtilage if the property is abandoned. An officer may consider property
abandoned if given the facts a reasonable person would conclude that the owner
of the property has relinquished all rights and reasonable expectation to the
property.
D. Deception and Informers. It is not a violation
of the Fourth Amendment to get information that a defendant volunteers to an
informer, even if the defendant did not know that he/she/they was disclosing
information to an informer who would relay that information to the Government.
If the informer carries an electronic device that records the conversation,
transmits it to a third person, or both, it is still not a search under the
Fourth Amendment.
E. Private Searches. Fourth Amendment
protections apply only to searches the Government conducts. Evidence obtained
or seized by a private person acting purely on his/her/their own incentive and
without any request or encouragement from a Government
agent may be admissible.
F. Stop and Frisk. When a Service officer
detains a person (not an arrest) in an investigatory field stop (or a
confrontation not involving detention), he/she/they may frisk the subject for
weapons by running his/her/their hands over the outer surfaces of the subject’s
clothing. The officer must have some objective basis (more than mere suspicion
or a “hunch,” but not probable cause) to believe that the subject may be armed
and dangerous and that frisking is necessary to protect the officer or others.
(1) If the officer can feel a weapon when
frisking, then the officer may conduct a more intensive search to locate and
seize the weapon.
(2) If, in addition to reasonable grounds of
safety, the officer has specific information that the subject has a weapon, he/she/they
may immediately search for it without conducting a preliminary frisk. Such
information should come from a reliable informant and does not need to be
corroborated by other facts.
G. Domestic Mail - Classes of Mail
other than First-Class. The Fourth Amendment fully protects first-class
mail. Service officers may not search first-class mail. Postal authorities may
only search first-class mail with a search warrant. Postal authorities
can detain first-class mail for a reasonable time while they obtain a search
warrant. Other classes of mail are subject to inspection. Service officers
should coordinate domestic mail searches/inspections with postal inspection
authorities of the U.S. Postal Service.
1.25 What types of
Administrative Inspections may Service Officers conduct?
A. Administrative Inspections. Administrative
inspections differ from other searches because their purpose is not to discover
evidence for criminal prosecutions, but rather to license, regulate, or
otherwise control activities that affect the public welfare or interest. If it
appears the intent of the inspection is to discover evidence for criminal
prosecution, courts will generally not admit such evidence in a criminal
proceeding. In general, administrative inspections must still meet Fourth
Amendment requirements for searches and seizures, whether they are of private
residences or of business premises.
B. Regulations and Permits. Some Service
regulations and permits require that entities conducting activities under those
regulations or permits waive their Fourth Amendment rights and allow inspection
of their premises and records at all reasonable times. The waivers are required
because the activities require close supervision and inspection to protect the
public interest.
(1) Wildlife inspectors should conduct such
inspections only if the inspections are related to wildlife or protected plant
import/export activities. Wildlife inspectors must have the approval of their
Resident Agent in Charge.
(2) If the permit holder refuses to allow an
administrative inspection as required by regulations or a permit, the Service
officer may not enter the premises in question or inspect without a search
warrant. Such refusal may, however, be grounds for suspension or revocation of
the permit or for prosecution for a violation of the permit conditions.
(3) If the Service officer anticipates that the
permit holder will refuse to allow such an inspection, the Service officer may
obtain an Administrative warrant ahead of time.
However, the permit holder may still avoid an administrative inspection if they
relinquish their permit rather than undergo inspection. If an officer
anticipates the permit holder may refuse an inspection, the officer should
obtain a criminal search warrant, if possible, to ensure inspection.
For more information about this policy,
contact the Office of Law Enforcement. For more information about this website,
contact Krista Bibb in the Policy and Regulations Branch (PRB),
Division of Policy, Economics, Risk Management, and Analytics.
PRB
website: Centralized Library of
Servicewide Policies
Privacy, Disclaimer and Copyright
Information | Information
Quality Act
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Home Page | Department of the Interior | USA.gov