[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34271-34273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13827]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R6-ES-2020-N131; FXES11140600000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery
Plan for Pagosa Skyrocket
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of a draft recovery plan for Pagosa skyrocket, a plant
listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. We are
requesting review and comment from the public on this draft plan.
DATES: We must receive any comments on the draft recovery plan on or
before August 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES:
Document availability: Copies of the draft recovery plan are
available at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html.
Alternatively, you may request a copy by U.S. mail from the Western
Colorado Field Office; 445 W. Gunnison Ave. #240; Grand Junction, CO
81501; or by telephone at 970-243-2778. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf may call the Federal Relay
Service at 800-877-8339.
Submitting comments: If you wish to comment on the draft recovery
plan, you may submit your comments in writing by email to Ann
Timberman, at ann_timberman@fws.gov, or by U.S. mail to Ann Timberman,
Western Slope Field Supervisor, at the above U.S. mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Timberman, Western Slope Field
Supervisor, at the above U.S. mail address or by telephone at 970-243-
2778. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), announce the availability of a draft recovery plan for
Pagosa skyrocket (Ipomopsis polyantha), a plant listed as endangered
under the Endangered Species Act, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). The draft recovery plan includes objective, measurable criteria,
and site-specific management actions as may be necessary to remove the
species from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. We
are requesting review and comment from the public on this draft
recovery plan.
Species Information
On August 26, 2011, we listed Pagosa skyrocket as an endangered
plant (July 27, 2011; 76 FR 45054). On August 13, 2012, we designated
approximately 9,641 acres (ac) (3,902 hectares (ha)) of critical
habitat (77 FR 48368).
Pagosa skyrocket is a narrow endemic plant, occurring only on soils
of the Mancos shale formation in Archuleta County, Colorado. It occurs
at between 6,400 to 8,100 feet (ft) (1,951-2,469 meters (m)) in
elevation and typically grows on infrequently disturbed lightly
vegetated sites or at the edge of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)
forest (Anderson 2004, p. 20). Pagosa skyrocket appears able to self-
pollinate when stressed, but reproduction is more successful when
outcrossed (Anderson 2004, p. 23).
Pagosa skyrocket typically spends more than a year in a vegetative
state before flowering and dying (monocarpic perennial). However, if
conditions are ideal, it behaves as a biennial. It is a member of the
Polemoniaceae (phlox) family and is regarded as a distinct species
(Anderson 2004, p. 10).
We do not know the historical distribution of Pagosa skyrocket.
Currently, we know of two populations--Pagosa Springs/Mill Creek and
Dyke--occupying approximately 462 ac (187 ha) and located 13 miles (mi)
(21 kilometers (km)) apart. Approximately 3.5 ac (1.4 ha) of occupied
habitat occurs on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. The remainder
of occupied habitat is located on private land, land owned by the Town
of Pagosa Springs, highway rights of way (ROWs), and an 88-ac (36-ha)
parcel owned and managed by Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW). The CPW
parcel contains more than 90 percent of all known Pagosa skyrocket
plants and is managed with the primary goal of conserving Pagosa
skyrocket. All known occupied habitat for the species occurs within
designated critical habitat.
The primary threat to Pagosa skyrocket, both at the time of listing
and currently, is commercial, residential, agricultural, and municipal
development. We have documented losses from development of habitat and
individual plants for both populations. Without additional protections,
we anticipate an increase in the magnitude of this threat affecting the
species' future resiliency, redundancy, and representation.
Overgrazing, invasive plants, and climate change may exacerbate the
threat from development.
Several conservation actions have been initiated since listing in
2011 as follows:
(1) CPW acquired 88 ac (36 ha) of occupied Pagosa skyrocket
critical habitat that had been slated for development. The primary
management goal of this parcel is conservation of Pagosa skyrocket.
(2) Archuleta County incorporated Pagosa skyrocket preservation
into the Archuleta County Community Plan to assist in recovering the
species.
(3) The Town of Pagosa Springs Master Plan identified a goal to
``Strive to protect and celebrate the Pagosa skyrocket.''
(4) Volunteers and the Geothermal Greenhouse Partnership initiated
greenhouse experiments to grow and transplant Pagosa skyrocket
individuals.
[[Page 34272]]
Draft Recovery Plan
Below, we summarize components from our draft recovery plan. Please
reference the draft recovery plan for full details.
The draft recovery plan describes the recovery goal as the
conservation and survival of Pagosa skyrocket. For recovery, the
species needs at least three (redundant) persistent (resilient)
populations across the species' range, where recruitment over time
equals or exceeds loss of individuals and ecological and genetic
diversity are maintained (representation). The three populations would
include the two currently known populations (Pagosa Springs/Mill Creek
and Dyke), as well as a third population that may be newly discovered
or introduced. These three resilient populations would provide
sufficient representation and redundancy across the species' range.
The draft recovery plan includes recovery criteria for both
downlisting and delisting. Downlisting criteria include:
(1) Maintaining stable or increasing population growth rates in
three populations, with or without augmentation;
(2) Maintaining a minimum population of 4,824 individual plants in
the Pagosa Springs/Mill Creek and Dyke populations, and a minimum
population of 1,500 individual plants in the third newly discovered or
introduced population;
(3) Each of the three populations have regulatory mechanisms or
conservation plans in place that address habitat loss and degradation
from development, thus helping meet population trend and abundance
targets identified in the first two criteria; and
(4) Both known populations are represented in an off-site seed
collection to preserve the genetic diversity of Pagosa skyrocket and
provide added protection from potential stochastic events.
Delisting criteria are the same as for downlisting, with the
exception that all three populations must meet the first two criteria
without further augmentation. To help meet these criteria, the draft
recovery plan identifies recovery actions for each criteria.
Recovery Planning Process
Restoring an endangered or threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, self-sustaining member of its ecosystem is
a primary goal of the Service's endangered species program. Recovery
means improving the status of a listed species to the point at which
listing is no longer necessary according to the criteria specified
under section 4(a)(1) of the Act. The Act requires recovery plans for
listed species unless such a plan would not promote the conservation of
a particular species. To help guide recovery efforts, we prepare
recovery plans to promote the conservation of the species.
The purpose of a recovery plan is to provide a recommended
framework for the recovery of a species so that protection of the Act
is no longer necessary. Pursuant to section 4(f) of the Act, a recovery
plan must, to the maximum extent possible, include:
(1) A description of site-specific management actions as may be
necessary to achieve the plan's goal for the conservation and survival
of the species;
(2) Objective, measurable criteria which, when met, would support a
determination under section 4(a)(1) of the Act that the species should
be removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened Species; and
(3) Estimates of time and costs required to carry out those
measures needed to achieve the plan's goal and to achieve intermediate
steps toward that goal.
We used our new recovery planning and implementation (RPI) process
to develop the draft recovery plan for Pagosa skyrocket. The RPI
process helps reduce the time needed to develop and implement recovery
plans, increases the relevancy of the recovery plan over longer
timeframes, and adds flexibility so that the recovery plan can be more
easily adjusted to new information and circumstances. Under our RPI
process, a recovery plan will include the three statutorily required
elements for recovery plans--objective and measurable criteria, site-
specific management actions, and estimates of time and cost--along with
a concise introduction and our strategy for how we plan to achieve
species recovery. The RPI recovery plan is supported by a separate
species status assessment for the Pagosa skyrocket (SSA; Service 2020).
The SSA is an in-depth, but not exhaustive, review of the species'
biology and threats, an evaluation of its biological status, and an
assessment of the resources and conditions needed to maintain long-term
viability. The SSA provides the scientific background and threats
assessment for Pagosa skyrocket, which are key to the development of
the recovery plan. A third, separate working document, called the
recovery implementation strategy (RIS), steps down the more general
descriptions of actions in the recovery plan to detail the specifics
needed to implement the recovery plan, which improves the flexibility
of the recovery plan. The RIS will be adaptable, with new information
on actions incorporated, as needed, without requiring a concurrent
revision to the recovery plan, unless changes to the three statutory
elements are required.
Peer Review
In accordance with our July 1, 1994, peer review policy (59 FR
34270; July 1, 1994); our August 22, 2016, Director's Memo on the Peer
Review Process; and the Office of Management and Budget's December 16,
2004, Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (revised June
2012), we solicited independent scientific reviews of the information
contained in the SSA report. Results of this structured peer review
process can be found at https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/science/peerReview.php. We also submitted our SSA report to our Federal and
State partners for their scientific review. There is no overlap of
occupied habitat or critical habitat with Tribal lands. We incorporated
the results of the peer and partner review in the SSA report, as
appropriate. The SSA report is the scientific foundation for the draft
recovery plan.
Request for Public Comments
All comments we receive by the date specified (see DATES) will be
considered prior to approval of the recovery plan. Written comments and
materials regarding the recovery plan should be sent via one of the
means in the ADDRESSES section.
We will consider all information we receive during the public
comment period, and particularly look for comments that provide
scientific rationale or factual background. The Service and other
Federal agencies and partners will take these comments into
consideration in the course of implementing an approved final recovery
plan. We are specifically seeking comments and suggestions on the
following questions:
Understanding that the time and cost presented in the
draft recovery plan will be fine-tuned when localized recovery
implementation strategies are developed, do you think that the
estimated time and cost to recovery are realistic? Is the estimate
reflective of the time and cost of actions that may have already been
implemented by Federal, State, county, or other agencies? Please
provide suggestions or methods for determining a more accurate
estimation.
Do the draft recovery criteria provide clear direction to
partners on
[[Page 34273]]
what is needed to recover Pagosa skyrocket? How could they be improved
for clarity?
Are the draft recovery criteria both objective and
measurable given the information available for Pagosa skyrocket now and
into the future? Please provide suggestions.
Understanding that specific, detailed, and area-specific
recovery actions will be developed in the RIS, do you think that the
draft recovery actions presented in the draft recovery plan generally
cover the types of actions necessary to meet the recovery criteria? If
not, what general actions are missing? Are any of the draft recovery
actions unnecessary for achieving recovery? Have we prioritized the
actions appropriately?
Public Availability of Comments
We will summarize and respond to the issues raised by the public in
an appendix to the approved final recovery plan. Before including your
address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. You may request at the top of your
comment that we withhold this information from public review; however,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Matthew Hogan,
Deputy Regional Director, Lakewood, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2021-13827 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P