Visitors to national wildlife refuges are concerned about the impact of climate change on America’s fish, wildlife and plants ─ as well as the habitat that supports them, a new survey just released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shows. The survey also shows strong support for efforts to help native species adapt to changing climate conditions, such as those now being implemented by the Service and its partners.
Seventy-one percent of the more than 10,000 visitors to national wildlife refuges who took part in the survey ─ conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2010 and 2011 ─ believe that climate change poses a serious threat to wildlife and wildlife habitat. About 74 percent of the same respondents agree that addressing climate change effects on wildlife and wildlife habitats will benefit future generations.
“The results of this survey underscore the Service’s responsibility ─ entrusted to us by the American people ─ to ensure that we use the best science to understand and anticipate the impacts of a changing climate in order to safeguard fish, wildlife and plants and the important benefits and services they provide,” said Service Director Dan Ashe. “We recognize the serious threats that climate change and other environmental stressors pose to wildlife, and we’re working with our partners to address these immense challenges using the latest science-driven approaches.”
Impacts on Fish and Wildlife
Significant climate-related impacts on fish and wildlife have already been observed by scientists across North America. These impacts include dramatic shifts in the range of dozens of species and altered precipitation patterns, resulting in increased flooding in some areas and drought and water scarcity in others. In addition, flowers are blooming earlier in the spring, while lakes are freezing later in the fall. These shifts have disrupted the migration patterns of birds, as well as the food chain on which they and many other species depend.
Ashe noted that the Service’s statutory authorities do not give the agency the ability or responsibility to regulate the causative factors of climate change. However, those authorities do require the Service to work with the conservation community to anticipate and manage for the impacts of climate change on fish and wildlife resources ─ as the agency is required to address any other factor affecting the long-term health and abundance of these resources.
Climate Change Strategy
The Fish and Wildlife Service is working with its partners to address the impacts of climate change on fish, wildlife and plants and the communities that depend on them. These efforts include:
“As we look to the future, the Refuge System will need to prioritize land restoration to effectively sequester carbon and protect wildlife,” said Refuge System Chief Jim Kurth. “That means targeted restoration to bring altered landscapes into balance and to protect habitats that support viable populations of wildlife. Most importantly, we have to work with other government agencies, non-profit organizations and private landowners to face the challenge of climate change.”
The National Wildlife Refuge System, managed by the Service, is the nation’s premier system of public lands and waters set aside to conserve wildlife and wildlife habitat. National wildlife refuges protect thousands of species; many also are popular recreation sites, noted for their hunting and fishing, paddling and hiking, and wildlife observation.
Improving Our Quality of Life
Other survey results show that more than half of the refuge visitors surveyed indicated a high level of both interest and personal involvement in climate issues. More than two-thirds of respondents (69 percent) agreed that addressing climate change impacts could “improve our quality of life.” Nearly half of visitors surveyed (46 percent) expressed interest in learning from refuges what they could do to help address the effects of climate change on wildlife and habitat.
Economic considerations factored into visitors’ assessments of climate change impacts. More than two-thirds (71 percent) agreed that “it is important to consider the economic costs and benefits to local communities when addressing climate change effects on fish, wildlife and habitats.”
USGS social scientist Natalie Sexton was the lead researcher on the report. The USGS designed, conducted, analyzed and reported on the peer-reviewed survey. The survey is available here.