Ruddy Turnstone Habitat Model
go to:
USFWS
Gulf of Maine Watershed Habitat Analysis
go to:
Species
Table
Draft Date:
November 2002
Species:
Ruddy turnstone, Arenaria interpres
Use of Study Area Resources:
Migration. Ruddy turnstones breed in the tundra regions of northern North
America from Alaska to Greenland, also Europe and Asia (Nettleship 2000).
They winter along the eastern Atlantic coast of Europe through northwestern
Africa, and both coasts North and Central America. On the Eastern Seaboard
they winter as far north as Massachusetts (Veit and Petersen 1993), but
occasionally into Nova Scotia (Nettleship 2000).
Habitat Requirements:
Outside the breeding season, coastal habitats are preferred (Hayman et al.1986).
Ruddy turnstones "concentrate at large estuaries, rocky coasts, and mixed
pebble and sand beaches, where they feed rapidly, usually in tight groups,
flying in unison from one patch to another... [also found on] mudflats
with seaweed debris, mussel beds, and some inland lakeshores or beaches"
(Nettleship 2000). They are primarily associated with rocky shores (Johnsgard
1981), and prefer sand and pebble beaches to mud flats (Veit and Petersen
1993). During winter they use protected mudflats with mussel beds, or stony
shores with seaweed growth (Hayman et al.1986, Nettleship 2000).
Ruddy turnstones feed opportunistically on intertidal invertebrates (crustaceans, molluscs, marine worms), insects, carrion, small fishes, and even gull and tern eggs (Nettleship 2000).
Wintering and migration habitats are vulnerable to disturbance, contamination, and development. Staging areas, in particular, are situated in coastal areas with much human activity, or may depend on food resources being depleted by commercial fishing activities (e.g., horseshoe crab fishery in Delaware Bay; Nettleship 2000).
Model:
Sites with known ruddy turnstone occurrences were scored higher than areas
having appropriate cover types but without observation data. We used
abundance/occurrence information from a Maine Department of Inland Fisheries
and Wildlife (MDIFW) shorebird coverage and the Manomet Bird Observatory's
International Shorebird Survey (ISS) database for Maine, Massachusetts and
New Hampshire. This occurrence information was used to select the general
localities (polygons or buffers around observation points) used by the species.
Environmental data sets (bathymetry and wetland cover type) were used to
identify areas within those localities likely to have been used. The ISS
data specified the observation locations only to the nearest geographic minute.
Therefore, all suitable cover types (see table, below) within the MDIFW polygons
or within a 1 km radius of the point data were regarded as having the respective
levels of use for that observation.
| NWI Designations
(wetlands only) |
Cover Types | Cover Suitability (0 - 1 scale) |
| Upland deciduous forest | ||
| Upland coniferous forest | ||
| Upland mixed forest | ||
| Grassland | ||
| Upland scrub/shrub | ||
| Cultivated | ||
| Developed | ||
| Bare ground | ||
| PEM, L2EM | Lake/pond, emergent vegetation | |
| PFOcon | Palustrine forest, conifer | |
| PFOdec | Palustrine forest, deciduous | |
| PSSdec | Palustrine scrub shrub, deciduous | |
| PSScon | Palustrine scrub shrub, conifer | |
| PAB, L2AB | Lake/pond, aquatic vegetation | |
| L1UB, PUB | Lake/pond, unconsolidated bottom | |
| L2US | Lake, unconsolidated shore | 0.5 |
| L2RS | Lake, rocky shore | |
| R1UB | Riverine subtidal unconsolidated | |
| Rper | Riverine perennial | |
| E1AB | Estuarine subtidal vegetated | |
| E1UB | Estuarine subtidal unconsolidated bottom | |
| E2AB | Estuarine intertidal algae | 0.7 |
| E2EM | Estuarine intertidal emergent | |
| E2RS, R1RS | Estuarine, tidal river rocky shore | 1.0 |
| E2SS | Estuarine intertidal shrub | |
| E2US, R1US | Estuarine, riverine intertidal unconsolidated shore | 0.7 |
| M1AB | Marine subtidal vegetated | |
| M1UB | Marine subtidal unconsolidated bottom | |
| M2AB | Marine intertidal algae | 0.7 |
| M2RS | Marine intertidal rocky shore | 1.0 |
| M2US | Marine intertidal unconsolidated shore | 0.7 |
| NOTES |
Habitat Suitability Scoring: Sites with ruddy turnstone occurrences and having any of the suitable landcover types (see table) first were scored according to level of use. If a site had 5 or more birds observed at any time, the landcover scores were applicable as presented; otherwise, if any birds were present, the landcover values were half the nominal score.
Suitable cover types outside of the observation/occurrence polygons were scored 0.2 for rocky shores and 0.1 for unconsolidated substrates.
Sources:
Hayman, P., J. Marchant and T. Prater. 1986. Shorebirds: an Identification Guide to the Waders of the World. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA. 412pp.
Johnsgard, P.A. 1981. The Plovers, Sandpipers and Snipes of the World. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln. 493 pp.
Nettleship, D.N. 2000. Ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres). In A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 537. The Birds of North America, Inc. Philadelphia, PA.
Veit, R.R. and W.R. Petersen. 1993. Birds of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Audubon Society. 514 p.