Plymouth Redbelly Turtle Habitat
Model
go to:
USFWS
Gulf of Maine Watershed Habitat Analysis
go to:
Species
Table
Feedback:
We welcome your suggestions on improving this model!
Draft Date:
February 16, 2001
Species:
Plymouth redbelly turtle, Pseudemys rubriventris
Use of Study Area Resources:
All stages. The species ranges from North Carolina through New Jersey, plus
a disjunct population in southeastern Massachusetts. Redbelly turtles in
Massachusetts, though not genetically distinctive (Iverson and Graham 1990,
Brown 1996), are regarded as a unique population segment (Amaral 1994). The
turtle is Federally listed [endangered], with a designated critical habitat
encompassing many of the 17 ponds and 1 river site in Plymouth Co. Massachusetts.
The study area boundary encompasses about half of these sites. A management
program called "headstarting" involves captive hatching and rearing of nestlings
for release into know turtle habitats, and for extending the turtle's range.
Habitat Requirements:
"The Plymouth redbelly turtle is a large, freshwater basking turtle of deep
coastal plain ponds. It subsists primarily on aquatic vegetation, and requires
good water quality and suitable basking, nesting and overwintering sites
free from disturbance" (Amaral 1994). The turtle is associated with natural
and man-made lakes and pond, surrounded by oak-pine barrens (Endangered Species
Information System - ESIS).
In spring females select nest sites in sandy soil, usually within 90 m of the pond, and deposit about 12 eggs (Haskell 1993 in Amaral 1994). In man-modified environments turtles nest in sandy dikes or roadways (ESIS). Hatchlings enter the pond in late summer or overwinter and emerge the following spring. Maturity may require 15 to 20 years (T.E. Graham pers. com. in Amaral 1994). Plymouth redbelly turtles overwinter at the bottom of ponds.
They feed on aquatic vegetation, and also invertebrates such as crayfish (Amaral 1994). Water quality and quantity (to provide appropriate lake water elevations) are essential for maintaining the trophic condition and productivity of turtle food supplies. Nesting sites should be open-canopy to assure adequate solar heating to maintain incubation temperatures for nests. Safe access to nesting sites and migration corridors between ponds also are vital for maintenance of this population.
Habitat Mapping:
Redbelly turtle occurrence information was obtained from the Massachusetts
Natural Heritage Program, supplemented by data from the USFWS New England
Field Office. Polygon and point data were used to identify lakes at which
nesting was known to occur. Adjacent uplands which may serve as nest
areas or travel corridors were selected by buffering lakes 3 cells (90m).
A minimum bounding rectangle was constructed around all occurrence locations,
and other ponds and adjacent uplands within this vicinity were mapped as
potential habitat. The latter was given approximately half the
score of sites known to be used. Habitat scoring is displayed in the following
table.
| NWI Designations (wetlands only) |
Cover Types |
Cover Suitability |
Cover Suitability (0 - 1 scale) Potential use |
| Upland deciduous forest | 0.7** |
0.3** | |
| Upland coniferous forest | 0.7** |
0.3** | |
| Upland mixed forest | 0.7** |
0.3** | |
| Grassland | 1.0** |
0.4** | |
| Upland scrub/shrub | 1.0** |
0.4** | |
| Cultivated | |||
| Developed | |||
| Bare ground | 1.0** |
0.4** | |
| PEM, L2EM | Lake/pond, emergent vegetation | 1.0* |
0.5* |
| PFOcon | Palustrine forest, conifer | 1.0* |
0.4* |
| PFOdec | Palustrine forest, deciduous | 1.0* |
0.4* |
| PSSdec | Palustrine scrub shrub, deciduous | 1.0* |
0.4* |
| PSScon | Palustrine scrub shrub, conifer | 1.0* |
0.4* |
| PAB, L2AB | Lake/pond, aquatic vegetation | 1.0* |
0.5* |
| L1UB, PUB | Lake/pond, unconsolidated bottom | 1.0 |
0.5 |
| L2US | Lake, unconsolidated shore | 1.0 |
0.5 |
| L2RS | Lake, rocky shore | ||
| R1UB | Riverine subtidal unconsolidated | ||
| Rper | Riverine perennial | ||
| E1AB | Estuarine subtidal vegetated | ||
| E1UB | Estuarine subtidal unconsolidated bottom | ||
| E2AB | Estuarine intertidal algae | ||
| E2EM | Estuarine intertidal emergent | ||
| E2RS, R1RS | Estuarine, tidal river rocky shore | ||
| E2SS | Estuarine intertidal shrub | ||
| E2US | Estuarine intertidal unconsolidated shore | ||
| M1AB | Marine subtidal vegetated | ||
| M1UB | Marine subtidal unconsolidated bottom | ||
| M2AB | Marine intertidal algae | ||
| M2RS | Marine intertidal rocky shore | ||
| M2US | Marine intertidal unconsolidated shore | ||
| NOTES | *score as aquatic habitat, if within 90 m of ponds **score for nesting, if within 90 m of ponds |
These scores reflect our relative confidence in suitability of the habitat, and also allow the specific used and potential habitats to be distinguished on the maps.
Sources:
Amaral, M. 1994. Plymouth Redbelly Turtle (Pseudemys rubriventris)
Recovery Plan, second revision. USFWS, Hadley, MA. 39 p.
Brown, R.A. 1996. Genetic variation among populations of the redbelly turtle (Pseudemys rubriventris). Copeia 1:192-194.
Endangered Species Information System. Fish and Wildlife Information --VA Tech. http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/WWW/esis/lists/e155001.htm
Iverson, J.B. and T.E. Graham. 1990. Geographic variation in the redbelly turtle, Pseudemys rubriventris (reptilia: testudines). Annals of Carnegie Museum 59(1):1-13.