[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66297-66298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2017-N103; FXES11130000-189-FF08E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery
Plan for Franciscan Manzanita (Arctostaphylos franciscana)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of the Draft Recovery Plan for Franciscan Manzanita
(Arctostaphylos franciscana) for public review and comment. The draft
recovery plan includes objective, measurable criteria for downlisting
the species to threatened, and site-specific actions necessary to
reclassify the species from endangered to threatened on the Federal
Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.
DATES: We must receive any comments on the draft recovery plan on or
before February 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the draft recovery plan from our
website at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html.
Alternatively, you may contact the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-2605,
Sacramento, CA 95825 (telephone 916-414-6700).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Norris, Field Supervisor, at
the above street address or telephone number (see ADDRESSES).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants to the
point where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of our endangered species program and the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). Recovery means improvement of the status of listed species to
the point at which listing is no longer appropriate under the criteria
[[Page 66298]]
specified in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan
would not promote the conservation of a particular species.
Pursuant to section 4(f) of the ESA, a recovery plan must, to the
maximum extent practicable, include (1) a description of site-specific
management actions as may be necessary to achieve the plan's goals for
the conservation and survival of the species; (2) objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would support a determination under section
4(a)(1) that the species should be removed from the List of Endangered
and Threatened Species; and (3) estimates of the time and costs
required to carry out those measures needed to achieve the plan's goal
and to achieve intermediate steps toward that goal.
The Service has revised its approach to recovery planning; the
revised process is called Recovery Planning and Implementation (RPI).
The RPI process is intended to reduce the time needed to develop and
implement recovery plans, increase recovery plan relevancy over a
longer timeframe, and add flexibility to recovery plans so they can be
adjusted to new information or circumstances. Under RPI, a recovery
plan will include statutorily required elements (objective, measurable
criteria, site-specific management actions, and estimates of time and
costs), along with a concise introduction and our strategy for how we
plan to achieve species recovery. The RPI recovery plan is supported by
a separate Species Status Assessment, or in cases such as this one, a
species biological report that provides the background information and
threat assessment, which are key to recovery plan development. The
essential component to flexible implementation under RPI is producing a
separate working document called the Recovery Implementation Strategy
(implementation strategy). The implementation strategy steps down from
the more general description of actions described in the recovery plan
to detail the specific, near-term activities needed to implement the
recovery plan. The implementation strategy will be adaptable by being
able to incorporate new information without having to concurrently
revise the recovery plan, unless changes to statutory elements are
required.
Franciscan manzanita was thought to be extirpated in the wild prior
to the discovery of a single plant in 2009. There is still only a
single known wild specimen, although the species also exists in
cultivation to a limited extent. We listed Franciscan manzanita
throughout its entire range on September 5, 2012 (77 FR 54434). The
species has been known to occur only on the San Francisco peninsula in
areas with serpentine soils, bedrock outcrops, greenstone, and mixed
Franciscan rock. In addition to these serpentine soils, cool air
temperatures, and summer fog are the primary habitat requirements for
the species.
The most significant threat to Franciscan manzanita is habitat loss
from urbanization, which continues to impact remnant suitable habitat.
Other threats include competition from invasive native and nonnative
plants, potential infestation by Phytophthora sp., damage from
herbivores such as the California vole, climate change, visitor use,
vandalism, stochastic events, and the effects of small population size,
water stress, and hybridization with closely related species.
Recovery Plan Goals
The purpose of a recovery plan is to provide a framework for the
recovery of species so that protection under the ESA is no longer
necessary. A recovery plan includes scientific information about the
species and provides criteria that enable us to gauge whether
downlisting or delisting the species is warranted. Furthermore,
recovery plans help guide our recovery efforts by describing actions we
consider necessary for each species' conservation and by estimating
time and costs for implementing needed recovery measures.
The goal of this draft recovery plan is to improve the status of
Franciscan manzanita so that it can be downlisted. Due to the current
lack of information about the species' biology and habitat
requirements, the magnitude of current threats, and the existence of
only a single plant in the wild, it is not currently practicable to
determine appropriate delisting criteria; therefore, we focus on
meeting the goal of downlisting. To meet the recovery goal of
downlisting, the following objectives have been identified:
1. Establish additional stands of Franciscan manzanita using
cuttings and layers from the wild plant originally found on Doyle
Drive.
2. Establish stands of Franciscan manzanita using cuttings and
layers from plants collected from the Laurel Hill Cemetery that
represent other genotypes, and plant these individuals sufficiently
close to the wild Franciscan manzanita clones so that outcrossing
occurs among the genetically distinct individuals.
3. Protect and manage habitat around extant and newly established
plants (via vegetation control, irrigation supplementation, disease
prevention, herbivore removal, and other means).
4. Protect suitable habitat for future establishment of Franciscan
manzanita populations.
As Franciscan manzanita meets reclassification criteria, we will
review its status and consider it for downlisting on the Federal Lists
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit written comments on the draft recovery plan described in
this notice. All comments received by the date specified in DATES will
be considered in development of a final recovery plan for Franciscan
manzanita. You may submit written comments and information by mail or
in person to the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office at the above
address (see ADDRESSES).
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
We developed this draft recovery plan under the authority of
section 4(f) of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Lawrence Rabin,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2018-27825 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P