[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36287-36289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14649]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2012-N139: FF08ESMF00-FXES11120800000F2-123-F2]
Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the California
Tiger Salamander, Calaveras County, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have received an
application from Juan San Bartolome (applicant) for a 10-year
incidental take permit for one species under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act). The application addresses the potential for
``take'' of one listed animal, the threatened Central California
Distinct Population Segment of the California tiger salamander (tiger
salamander). The applicant would implement a conservation program to
minimize and mitigate the project activities, as described in the
applicant's
[[Page 36288]]
low-effect habitat conservation plan (Plan). We request comments on the
applicant's application and Plan, and the preliminary determination
that the Plan qualifies as a ``low-effect'' habitat conservation plan,
eligible for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA). We discuss our basis for this
determination in our environmental action statement (EAS), also
available for public review.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before July 18, 2012.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information
request or comment is in reference to the Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the California Tiger Salamander, Calaveras
County, California.
U.S. Mail: Mike Thomas, Conservation Planning Division,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office,
2800 Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
In-Person Drop-off, Viewing, or Pickup: Call 916-414-6600
to make an appointment during regular business hours to drop off
comments or view received comments at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation
Planning Division, or Eric Tattersall, Deputy Assistant Field
Supervisor, at the address shown above or at 916-414-6600 (telephone).
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the
Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of the permit application, plan, and EAS from
the individuals in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Copies of these
documents are also available for public inspection, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act prohibits taking of fish and wildlife species
listed as endangered or threatened under section 4 of the Act. Under
the Act, the term ``take'' means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct. The term ``harm'' is defined in the regulations as
significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death
or injury of listed species by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR
17.3). The term ``harass'' is defined in the regulations as to carry
out actions that create the likelihood of injury to listed species to
such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns,
which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
(50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally listed species, provided that
the take that occurs is incidental to, but not the purpose of, an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing permits for endangered
and threatened species are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains provisions for issuing such
incidental take permits to non-Federal entities for the take of
endangered and threatened species, provided the following criteria are
met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a proposed HCP and ensure that
adequate funding for the plan will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
5. The applicants will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes
of the HCP.
The applicant seeks an incident take permit for covered activities
within 109 acres of grassland associated with the construction of 15-
lot subdivision, with a minimum 5-acre parcel size, on the north side
of Highway 12, in northwest Calaveras County, just west of Burson,
California. The following federally listed species will be included as
a covered species (covered species) in the applicants' proposed Plan:
Central California Distinct Population Segment of the
California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) (threatened)
The applicant would receive assurances under our ``No Surprises''
regulations (50 CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)) for take of tiger
salamanders.
Covered activities include the following:
Grading and ground leveling associated with construction
of 15 residential homes,
Vegetation removal and planting,
Use of heavy equipment (not limited to bulldozers and
backhoes),
Erosion control structures (such as silt fencing and
barriers),
Dust control (such as watering surface soils),
Construction of driveways and roadways,
Trenching and installation of utilities and irrigation
systems, and
Landscaping associated with all of the above activities
and structures.
The applicant proposes to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the effects
to the covered species associated with the covered activities by fully
implementing the Plan. Minimization measures will include, but are not
limited to:
An employee education program,
Temporary construction fencing,
A 15-mile per hour speed limit,
Construction work time windows (i.e., to avoid the rainy
season and nighttime work), and
A deed restriction or conservation easement on 54 acres of
the site for protection of tiger salamander upland habitat.
The applicant proposes to build a 15-lot subdivision, with a
minimum 5-acre parcel size. Thirteen of the lots would be between 5.0
and 5.5 acres, one lot would be 9.0 acres, and the largest and most
northerly lot would encompass 26.57 acres, including an existing pond
that would be left undisturbed. The subdivision includes 15 single-
family residences with associated landscaping, utilities, and roadways.
Alternatives
Our proposed action is approving the applicant's Plan and issuance
of an incidental take permit for the applicant's covered activities. As
required by the Act, the applicant's Plan considers alternatives to the
take under the proposed action. The Plan considers the environmental
consequences of two alternatives to the proposed action, the No Action
Alternative and a Reduced Take Alternative. Under the No Action
Alternative, we would not issue a permit; the applicant would not build
the proposed subdivision, the on-site upland grassland habitat would
not receive protection, and no take would occur for the construction of
the
[[Page 36289]]
residence and its associated structures. For these reasons, the No-
Action Alternative has been rejected.
Under the Reduced Take Alternative, we would issue an incidental
take permit for the development of 10 residential units instead of the
proposed 15. However, due to the relatively small project site
dimensions, the County's zoning ordinance of a minimum 5-acre parcels,
and infrastructure that would still be required by the landowner (e.g.,
roads, utilities, etc.) any further reduction in the number of lots
would make the project economically unviable. In addition, even though
this alternative would result in larger lot size and slightly less
vehicular traffic due to the reduced number of homeowners, the impacts
to the covered species relative to the increase in preserved upland
habitat would be small. For these reasons, the Reduced Take Alternative
was rejected.
Under the Proposed Action Alternative, we would issue an incidental
take permit for the applicant's proposed project, which includes the
activities described above. The Proposed Action Alternative would
result in permanent loss of 55 acres of upland grassland habitat for
the California tiger salamander. To mitigate for these effects, the
applicant proposes to protect, enhance, and manage in perpetuity 54
acres of on-site grassland habitat.
National Environmental Policy Act
As described in our EAS, we have made the preliminary determination
that approval of the proposed Plan and issuance of the permit would
qualify as a categorical exclusion under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
as provided by Federal regulations (40 CFR 1500, 5(k), 1507.3(b)(2),
1508.4) and the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2 and 516 DM
8). Our EAS found that the proposed plan qualifies as a ``low-effect''
habitat conservation plan, as defined by our Habitat Conservation
Planning Handbook (November 1996). Determination of low-effect habitat
conservation plans is based on the following three criteria: (1)
Implementation of the proposed plan would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally-listed, proposed, and candidate species and their
habitats; (2) implementation of the proposed plan would result in minor
or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and
(3) impacts of the plan, considered together with the impacts of other
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects,
would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental
values or resources that would be considered significant. Based upon
the preliminary determinations in the EAS, we do not intend to prepare
further NEPA documentation. We will consider public comments when
making the final determination on whether to prepare an additional NEPA
document on the proposed action.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this
notice. We particularly seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning the species;
2. Relevant data concerning the species;
3. Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of the species;
4. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the species;
5. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
6. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed development and permit action.
Authority
We provide this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act and the
NEPA public-involvement regulations (40 CFR 1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and
1506.6). We will evaluate the permit application, including the Plan,
and comments we receive to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. If the requirements are met,
we will issue a permit to the applicant for the incidental take of the
Central California Distinct Population Segment of the California tiger
salamander from the implementation of the covered activities described
in the Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the California Tiger
Salamander, Calaveras County, California. We will make the final permit
decision no sooner than 30 days after the date of this notice.
Dated: June 11, 2012.
Susan K. Moore,
Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2012-14649 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P