[Federal Register: June 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 109)]
[Notices]
[Page 32497-32502]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jn10-133]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-FHC-2010-N067; 71490-1351-0000-L5-FY10]
Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application and proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have received an
application from the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities and the Aleutians East Borough for authorization to take
small numbers of marine mammals by harassment incidental to the Akutan
Airport's Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation in Akutan and
Unalaska, Alaska. In accordance with provisions of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA), as amended, we request comments on our
proposed authorization for the applicant to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of northern sea otters for a period of 1
year, beginning May 1, 2010. We anticipate no take by injury or death
and include none in this proposed authorization, which would be for
take by harassment only.
DATES: Comments and information must be received by July 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
1. By mail to: Douglas Burn, Office of Marine Mammals Management,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK
99503.
2. By fax to: 907-786-3816.
3. By electronic mail (e-mail) to: R7_MMM_Comment@FWS.gov. Please
include your name and return address in your message. If you do not
receive a confirmation from the system that we have received your
message, contact us directly at the telephone numbers above.
4. By hand-delivery to the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request copies of the application,
the list of references used in this notice, and other supporting
materials, contact Douglas Burn at the address or telephone numbers in
ADDRESSES, or by e-mail at Douglas_Burn@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1371 (a)(5)(A) and (D)), authorize the Secretary of the Interior to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region, provided that we make certain findings and either
issue regulations or, if the taking is limited to harassment, provide a
notice of a proposed authorization to the public for review and
comment.
We may grant authorization to incidentally take marine mammals if
we find that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses. As part
of the authorization process, we prescribe permissible methods of
taking and other means of affecting the least practicable impact on the
species or stock and its habitat, and requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such takings.
The term ``take,'' as defined by the MMPA, means to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill, or to attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any
marine mammal. Harassment, as defined by the MMPA, means ``any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [the MMPA calls this
Level A harassment], or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of
behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering [the MMPA calls
this Level B harassment].''
The terms ``small numbers,'' ``negligible impact,'' and
``unmitigable adverse impact'' are defined in 50 CFR 18.27, the
Service's regulations governing take of small numbers of marine mammals
incidental to specified activities. ``Small numbers'' is defined as ``a
portion of a marine mammal species or stock whose taking would have a
negligible impact on that species or stock.'' ``Negligible impact'' is
defined as ``an impact resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to,
adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates
of recruitment or survival.'' ``Unmitigable adverse impact'' is defined
as ``an impact resulting from the specified activity (1) that is likely
to reduce the availability of the species to a level insufficient for a
harvest to meet subsistence needs by (i) Causing the marine mammals to
abandon or avoid hunting areas, (ii) directly displacing subsistence
users, or (iii) placing physical barriers between the marine mammals
and the subsistence hunters; and (2) that cannot be sufficiently
mitigated by other measures to increase the availability of marine
mammals to allow subsistence needs to be met.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals where the take
will be limited to harassment. Section 101(a)(5)(D)(iii) establishes a
45-day time limit for Service review of an application, followed by a
30-day public notice and comment period on any proposed authorizations
for the incidental harassment of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the
close of the comment period, we must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization. We refer to these authorizations as Incidental
Harassment Authorizations (IHAs).
Previous Federal Action
On July 9, 2008, we received a joint application from the Alaska
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Aleutians
East Borough (Applicants) for the taking by harassment of northern sea
otters (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) incidental to the Akutan Airport,
Alaska Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation (Project). The
request was published in the Federal Register on August 27, 2008 (73 FR
50634). On November 10, 2008, the Service issued IHAs to the Applicants
authorizing Level B harassment of northern sea otters for a period of 1
year, the last date of which is April 30, 2010. Due to funding
constraints, no construction activities or hovercraft operations have
been conducted to date or will be conducted during the remainder of
this period. Therefore no incidental take of sea otters occurred under
the existing IHAs.
[[Page 32498]]
Summary of Request
On January 25, 2010, we received a joint application from the
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the
Aleutians East Borough (Applicants) to reissue the existing
authorization for an additional 1-year period for the taking by
harassment of northern sea otters incidental to the Project. The
activities described in this joint application request are the same as
those proposed in 2008. Therefore, if issued, the IHA will be basically
the same.
Under the proposed action, the Applicants would construct a new
airport on the southwestern portion of Akun Island, which would serve
the community of Akutan, approximately 7 miles to the west. Access to
the Akun airport location would be provided by hovercraft from the
community of Akutan to Surf Beach, which offers a protected landing
area. Marine service by hovercraft between the community of Akutan and
Surf Bay on Akun Island would satisfy passenger comfort and weather
operability goals. When not in use, the hovercraft would be stored in a
building at the head of Akutan Harbor. Staff would access the
hovercraft storage area at the head of the harbor by traveling in a
skiff. A 3,000-foot-long road would connect the hovercraft landing pad
on Surf Beach to the runway located on the bench above the beach. A
diesel bus would be used to transport passengers between the hovercraft
and aircraft. The bus would be fueled on site and stored at the airport
when not in use.
A detailed description of the proposed action is contained in a
Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) and Finding of No Significant
Impact/Record of Decision (FONSI/ROD) prepared by the Applicants for
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and issued in December 2007
(73 FR 4040; January 23, 2008). A Biological Opinion for the proposed
Akutan Airport Project was issued by the Service in May 2007.
Description of the Activity
Akutan Airport, Alaska--Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation
a. Timing of Construction and Hovercraft Operation
Construction of the airport and related transportation of
construction materials would commence in May 2010 and continue through
the third quarter (between October and December) of 2012. Hovercraft
testing could commence as early as the first quarter (between January
and March) of 2010, with sustained operations commencing in the fourth
quarter of 2012, after completion of construction.
b. Geographic Location of Action
The community of Akutan is located on a small bay on Akutan Island
in the eastern region of the Aleutian Islands (73 FR 50636). The city
of Akutan has a population of about 741. The community is located 35
miles east of Unalaska and 766 miles southwest of Anchorage. The
proposed location for the new airport to serve the community of Akutan
is on the southwestern portion of Akun Island, approximately 7 miles
east of the community. The hovercraft route would run between the
community of Akutan, across Akun Strait, to a landing site on the shore
of Surf Bay on Akun Island.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
Three monthly surveys for sea otters were conducted in winter
(January-March) 2006 as part of the field investigations for the Akun
Alternative by HDR Alaska, Inc. in Akutan Harbor, Akun Strait, and Surf
Bay along the proposed Akun airport hovercraft route. Sea otter numbers
were highest in January (22), with declines in February (17), and by
March, only 7 otters were observed. Preferred habitat appeared to
include protected areas in Akutan Harbor near the community of Akutan
and along nearshore habitats at Akun and Green Island. Most of the
otters sighted were individuals, and only one female with a pup was
observed during the winter surveys. A detailed description of the
habitat, status, distribution, and seasonal distribution of northern
sea otters is contained in the FEA, the Biological Assessment for the
proposed IHA, and the Biological Opinion (FWS 2007) for the proposed
Akutan Airport Project.
Since issuance of the IHAs in November 2008, additional sea otter
distribution information has become available (USGS 2008). Sea otter
distribution remained consistent over the period of review, the years
2004, 2006, and 2008. Areas around Green Island appear to support
relatively large numbers of sea otters, suggesting that disturbances in
this area should be minimized during construction and hovercraft
operations.
Status and Distribution of Affected Species
In North America, the northern sea otter is found along the coasts
of Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska. Present distribution
extends from the north coast of Washington State into the north
Vancouver Island area of British Colombia. In Alaska, northern sea
otters occur in the coastal waters from southeast Alaska to the
Aleutian Island chain (Riedman and Estes 1990). Currently there are
three population stocks of northern sea otters in Alaska. Since the
mid-1980s, the southwest population stock has undergone an overall 55-
67 percent decline (Doroff et al. 2003; Burn et al. 2003; Burn and
Doroff 2005; Estes et al. 2005; USFWS 2005). The animals found in the
Aleutian Islands have experienced the greatest declines. More
specifically, the population in the Rat Island group, located in the
central Aleutian Island chain, declined by about 94 percent; aerial
survey counts of the Rat Island group decreased from 270 in 1959 to 11
in 2000 (Kenyon 1969; Doroff et al. 2003). The reasons for this decline
are not well understood and are under investigation. Consequently, on
August 9, 2005, the southwestern Alaska distinct population segment
(DPS) of northern sea otters was listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.; 70 FR 46366). Critical habitat for this species was designated on
October 8, 2009 and became effective on November 9, 2009 (74 FR 51988).
Potential Impacts of the Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation
on Sea Otters
The proposed activities have the potential to disturb resting and
foraging activities of sea otters, particularly in waters that are
protected in the near shore habitat, which is used for resting, pup
rearing, and foraging. The incremental effects of the hovercraft
operation will be minimal in Akutan Harbor, which presently has
considerable amounts of vessel traffic. In contrast, Surf Bay has
relatively little vessel traffic. This fact may explain why surveys
indicate that the majority of sea otters observed along the hovercraft
route were in the proximity of Surf Bay. As a result, we expect most of
the impacts from incidental harassment to occur in the Surf Bay area.
The responses of marine mammals to airport construction and
hovercraft operations vary among species. Sea otters have not been
reported as particularly sensitive to sound and/or movement
disturbance, especially in comparison to other marine mammals such as
pinnipeds (U.S. Air Force and USFWS 1988; Efroymson and Suter 2001).
However, observations of sea otters indicate their responses to
disturbance are highly variable (A. Doroff, USFWS, pers. comm.). If any
sea
[[Page 32499]]
otters are present during project operations, some of them may be
temporarily disturbed by noise or hovercraft operating in the area.
This could result in an otter entering the water from land and/or
diving, which they do as part of their normal behavior pattern. The
short-term displacement of any hauled-out animals that is likely to
occur as a result of project noise and personnel is not anticipated to
affect the overall fitness of any individual animal.
Potential Effects on Habitat
Hovercraft landings would be constructed primarily in areas above
the mean high tide line to minimize adverse effects on northern sea
otters and their habitat. Surf Beach landing site construction will
impact about 0.4 intertidal acres and about 0.01 subtidal acres.
Construction at the head of Akutan Harbor will impact about 0.1
intertidal acres and about 0.6 subtidal acres.
Potential Impacts on Subsistence Needs
In the Aleutian Islands, rural residents use a variety of plant and
animals resources for subsistence purposes. The MMPA provides for a
subsistence take of marine mammals by Alaska Natives. Although northern
sea otters are harvested for subsistence purposes in the Aleutians,
information from the Service's marine mammal Marking, Tagging, and
Reporting Program (MTRP) indicates that on average, less than one sea
otter per year is harvested from Akutan. We do not anticipate that the
project described in this application would have any adverse effect on
subsistence uses or needs.
Mitigation Measures
As described in correspondence between FAA and the Service (FAA
2007; FWS 2007), the Applicants would be required to implement the
following measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the effects of the
proposed action on northern sea otters:
a. A Hovercraft Shall Be Used To Transport Passengers to and From the
Airport
As described in the Biological Assessment, hovercrafts produce less
wake and less underwater noise than other marine vessels. Peer-reviewed
scientific literature concludes that a hovercraft is considerably
quieter underwater than a similar-sized conventional vessel, and that
hovercraft may be an attractive alternative to conventional vessels if
underwater sounds cause concerns. In-air sound may constitute a source
of disturbance for listed sea otters.
b. The Hovercraft Landings Shall Be Located To Minimize Impacts to
Intertidal and Subtidal Areas
Construction of hovercraft landings shall occur primarily in areas
away from intertidal and subtidal areas to avoid adverse effects on
northern sea otters and their habitat. Construction of the Surf Beach
landing site would impact about 0.4 intertidal acres and about 0.01
subtidal acres. Construction at the head of Akutan Harbor would impact
about 0.1 intertidal acres and about 0.6 subtidal acres. Such
construction is likely to be more environmentally sensitive than
construction of fixed, in-water docks or other related facilities.
c. No Dredging or Pile Driving Is Anticipated During the Construction
of the Hovercraft Landings
Both dredging and pile driving have the potential to harass
northern sea otters due to habitat or noise disturbance. We anticipate
that the use of a hovercraft would avoid the need to construct in-water
facilities such as moorings, piers, or docks that could require
dredging or pile driving.
d. The Hovercraft Shall Be Operated According to a Route Operational
Manual, Which Shall Require Avoidance of Sensitive Areas and Species
The Applicants will be required to develop a Route Operational
Manual in consultation with the Service. The purpose of the Route
Operational Manual is to develop hovercraft routes and operational
procedures that avoid and minimize the likelihood of northern sea otter
disturbance. As described below, the Applicants propose to develop an
initial Route Operational Manual to ensure initial hovercraft
operations avoid adverse effects to listed northern sea otters and
other protected marine mammals. The Route Operational Manual would
require Service approval prior to initiation of hovercraft operation,
and operator compliance with the Route Operational Manual will be
required as a condition of airport design approval and Clean Water Act
404 permit issuance.
e. All Fueling and Hovercraft Maintenance Activities Shall Be Conducted
to the Maximum Extent Feasible at Least 100 Feet Away From Akutan
Harbor and Surf Bay, and Fuel Storage Shall Be at Least 100 Feet Away
From Akutan Harbor and Surf Bay
Northern sea otters are susceptible to the adverse effects of
oiling due to fuel spills because otters depend on their insulation of
dense fur to keep warm. Otters likewise may ingest oil during grooming
and feeding. To address this issue, the Applicants shall conduct all
fueling activities at the maximum distance feasible (i.e., at least 100
feet away from Akutan Harbor and Surf Bay). Fuel storage shall also
occur at least 100 feet away from these locations. The Applicants shall
comply with all applicable Federal and State fuel handling and storage
requirements, further reducing the risk that any spill reaches
sensitive northern sea otter habitat.
f. To Prevent Contamination, Hovercraft Maintenance Activities Shall
Occur in the Hovercraft Storage Building or on the Hovercraft Landing
As discussed above, sea otters are susceptible to the adverse
effects of oiling due to fuel spills because otters depend on their
insulation of dense fur to keep warm. Otters likewise may ingest oil or
other compounds during grooming or feeding. To address the risk of
spills or contamination associated with hovercraft maintenance, the
Applicants shall conduct all maintenance activities either on
hovercraft landing areas, above intertidal or subtidal areas or in the
hovercraft storage building. The Applicants shall comply with all
applicable Federal and State hazardous materials handling and storage
requirements, further reducing the risk that any contamination reaches
sensitive northern sea otter habitat.
g. Completion of an Initial Route Operational Manual Shall Be Expedited
The Applicants shall expedite completion of an initial Route
Operational Manual, which shall be developed in consultation with the
Service prior to initial operation of the hovercraft. The Route
Operational Manual will outline specific, detailed procedures to avoid
and minimize impacts to sea otters. The Route Operational Manual shall
identify hovercraft routes and provide a clearly written protocol that
all hovercraft operators will be required to follow during initial
hovercraft operations. The Applicants shall submit a draft initial
Route Operation Manual to the Service for review and approval at least
30 days prior to commencing hovercraft trials during the spring of
2010.
During Route Operational Manual development, the Applicants will
consult with the hovercraft manufacturer to ensure that hovercraft
operations occur in the most environmentally sensitive manner possible.
Through these discussions, the parties and the manufacturer may
[[Page 32500]]
identify additional, cost-effective measures to further reduce vessel
noise.
h. Northern Sea Otter Avoidance Areas Shall Be Established
The Applicants shall identify northern sea otter avoidance areas in
consultation with the Service. These avoidance areas will serve to help
delineate areas of likely northern sea otter occurrence to allow for
their avoidance. Avoidance areas will be established through the use of
preconstruction survey data collected by the Applicants in 2006.
i. Hovercraft Speed and Course Shall Be Altered
If a northern sea otter is observed within a set distance (e.g., a
minimum of 1,200 feet) of the hovercraft (distances to be determined
based on consultation with the Service) and based on the otter's
position and the otter's relative course of travel the otter is likely
to approach the hovercraft, the hovercraft's speed or course shall,
when practicable and safe, be changed to avoid impacts to the species.
Northern sea otter activities and movements relative to the hovercraft
will be closely monitored to ensure that an animal does not (1) travel
within a set distance (e.g., a minimum of 600 feet) of a departing
hovercraft or (2) travel within a set distance (e.g., a minimum of 300
feet) of an approaching hovercraft (the ``potential disturbance area''
or ``PDA''). If either of these events occurs, further mitigation
measures must be taken (e.g., further course alterations or power
down).
j. Power-Down Procedures Shall Be Used
A power down involves decreasing the speed of the hovercraft to
avoid interactions with, and potential disturbance of, northern sea
otters. If a northern sea otter is detected (1) within a set distance
(e.g., a minimum of 600 feet) of a departing hovercraft or (2) within a
set distance (e.g., a minimum of 300 feet) of an approaching
hovercraft, and the vessel's course or speed shall, consistent with
applicable design and operational requirements, decrease its speed to
the slowest practicable speed before the animal enters the PDA. Power-
down procedures shall be developed in consultation with the hovercraft
manufacturer and the Service to ensure procedures are safe and within
the operating parameters of the hovercraft.
k. Ramp-Up Procedures Shall Be Used
``Ramp-up'' procedures shall be implemented when starting up the
hovercraft, to provide additional protection to northern sea otters
located near hovercraft landing areas. These procedures will allow
individual animals to vacate the area to reduce the risk of injury, and
to further reduce the risk of potentially startling sea otters with a
sudden intensive sound. Ramp-up shall occur such that the sound
associated with hovercraft operations will increase at a rate of about
6 dB per 5 minutes. The Applicants shall confer with the hovercraft
manufacturer to develop ramp-up procedures consistent with this
guideline.
l. Low-Light Operations Shall Be Utilized
The Applicants shall work with the Service to develop night-time or
low-light operating procedures to avoid and minimize impacts to
northern sea otters and other species.
Findings
We propose the following findings regarding this action:
Small Numbers Determination and Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
For small take analysis, the statute and legislative history do not
expressly require a specific type of numbers analysis, leaving the
determination of ``small'' to the agency's discretion. Factors
considered in our small numbers determination include:
(1) The number of northern sea otters inhabiting the waters in the
impact area is expected to be small relative to the size of the
southwest Alaska population stock. Skiff-based surveys conducted in
2006 recorded up to 22 otters in proximity to the proposed hovercraft
route. The current estimate for the size of the southwest Alaska
population stock is approximately 48,000 individuals (USFWS 2008). The
number of northern sea otters that could potentially be taken by
harassment in association with the proposed activity is less than 0.05
percent of the estimated population size.
(2) The area where the activity would occur is small relative to
the range of the southwest Alaska population stock of sea otters. Surf
Bay on Akun Island is approximately 7 km in length. The southwest
Alaska population stock ranges from Attu Island in the west to lower
Cook Inlet in the east, a distance of more than 2,700 km. Therefore,
Surf Bay comprises less than 0.3 percent of the total range in linear
km of the southwest Alaska population stock of the northern sea otter.
(3) The area where the activity would occur will impact a
relatively small fraction of the habitat of the southwest Alaska
population stock of sea otters. As sea otters typically inhabit
nearshore marine areas, shoreline length is a readily available metric
that can be used to quantify sea otter habitat. The total length of
shoreline within the range of the southwest Alaska stock of northern
sea otters is approximately 19,531 km. By comparison, the shoreline of
Surf Bay is approximately 7 km in length, which is less than 0.04
percent of the total available habitat.
(4) Monitoring requirements and mitigation measures are expected to
significantly limit the number of incidental takes. Monitoring
information collected during initial hovercraft operations will provide
the Service and the Applicants with more current information about sea
otter distribution and abundance at Surf Bay on Akun Island. In the
event that larger numbers of sea otters than have previously been
observed are encountered at consistent locations, the Route Operational
Manual will be required to be revised to minimize incidents of
harassment.
Negligible Impact
The Service finds that any incidental take by harassment that is
reasonably likely to result from the proposed project would not
adversely affect the southwest Alaska stock of northern sea otters
through effects on rates of recruitment or survival, and would,
therefore, have no more than a negligible impact on the stock. In
making this finding, we considered the best available scientific
information, including: (1) The biological and behavioral
characteristics of the species; (2) the most recent information on
distribution and abundance of sea otters within the area of the
proposed activity; (3) the potential sources of disturbance during the
proposed activity; and (4) the potential response of northern sea
otters to disturbance.
The mitigation measures outlined above are intended to minimize the
number of sea otters that may be disturbed by the proposed activity.
Any impacts to individuals are expected to be limited to Level B
harassment of short-term duration. Response of sea otters to
disturbance would most likely be common behaviors such as diving and/or
swimming away from the source of the disturbance. No take by injury or
death is anticipated. We find that the anticipated harassment caused by
the proposed activities is not expected to adversely affect the species
or stock through effects on annual rate of recruitment or survival.
Our finding of negligible impact applies to incidental take
associated
[[Page 32501]]
with the proposed activity as mitigated through this authorization
process. This authorization establishes monitoring and reporting
requirements to evaluate the potential impacts of the authorized
activities, as well as mitigation measures designed to minimize
interactions with, and impacts to, northern sea otters.
Impact on Subsistence
We find that the anticipated harassment caused by the project would
not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of northern
sea otters for taking for subsistence uses during the period of the
activity. In making this finding, we considered the timing and location
of the project and subsistence harvest patterns, as reported through
the MTRP, in the proposed project area.
Marine Mammal Monitoring
The applicant would be required to conduct marine mammal monitoring
during the Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation, in order to
implement the mitigation measures that require real-time monitoring,
and to satisfy monitoring required under the MMPA. Project personnel
would be required to record information regarding location and behavior
of all sea otters observed during operations. When conditions permit,
information regarding age (pup, adult) and any tagged animals would
also be required to be recorded. The Applicants also propose to form an
Akutan marine mammal working group in coordination with the City of
Akutan, the Aleutians East Borough, the Service, and NMFS. This working
group would consist of representatives from affected native
organizations, the City of Akutan, the FAA, and the Services. The
working group would provide a forum to discuss hovercraft monitoring
results and other issues pertaining to airport operations and northern
sea otter conservation.
The working group shall discuss, among other things: (1) Any
proposed changes in hovercraft operations to provide both the FAA and
the Service with community perspectives on airport operations, (2)
monitoring frequency and duration based upon monitoring results and
related factors, and (3) completion of peer reviews for reports that
evaluate and interpret monitoring data. The Applicants will coordinate
the formation of the working group, and will be responsible for
organizing meeting agendas, establishing meeting locations, and
facilitating community involvement at such meetings. Working group
meetings shall commence within 60 days after FAA's approval of airport
construction, and shall occur on a quarterly basis for a minimum of 5
years after hovercraft operations commence.
Monitoring and Reporting
The Applicants shall implement the following monitoring and
reporting program to increase knowledge regarding the species, and to
assess the level of take caused by the proposed action:
a. Vessel-Based (Hovercraft) Monitoring During Initial Trial Operations
All hovercraft activities conducted prior to the construction of
the airport and commencement of flight service will be considered
``trial operations.'' Vessel-based monitoring will be conducted by a
qualified Service-approved observer. Vessel-based monitoring is
distinguished from other forms of monitoring in that it will be
conducted from the hovercraft itself, as opposed to from other
platforms (e.g., land, skiff). Methods for observing, estimating
distances to northern sea otters and other marine species, and
recording data quickly and accurately will be tested prior to
hovercraft operations at Akutan. Reticle binoculars (e.g., 7 x 50
Bushnell or equivalent) and laser range finders (Leica LRF 1200 laser
range finder or equivalent) are considered standard equipment for
observers on board ships with marine mammal observers. Final
observation methods will be approved by the Service.
Vessel-based observers will begin monitoring at least 30 minutes
prior to the planned start of the hovercraft and during all periods of
hovercraft operations to ensure the effectiveness of ramp-up as a
mitigation measure. Observers will also monitor the safety areas prior
to hovercraft operation. If northern sea otters are observed within the
safety areas, hovercraft operations will be altered in accordance with
procedures contained in the Route Operational Manual to avoid or
minimize noise-related disturbance to animals occurring in the area.
Data for each northern sea otter, other marine mammals, and
Steller's eiders observed in the action area during the period of
hovercraft operations will be collected and provided to the Service in
GIS format for mapping and analysis. Numbers of northern sea otters
observed, frequency of observation, sea state, any behavioral changes
due to hovercraft operations, and other pertinent variables will be
recorded and entered into a custom database using a notebook computer.
The accuracy of the data entry will be verified by computerized
validity data checks as the data are entered, and by subsequent manual
checking of the database. These procedures will allow initial summaries
of data to be prepared during and shortly after the field program, and
will facilitate transfer of the data to statistical, graphical, or
other programs for additional processing and archiving.
Results from the vessel-based observations will provide: (1) A
basis for real-time mitigation; (2) information needed to estimate the
number of northern sea otters that are determined to have been
harassed; (3) data on the occurrence, distribution, and activities of
marine mammals in the area where hovercraft operations are conducted;
and (4) data on the behavior and movement patterns of northern sea
otters seen at times with and without hovercraft activity.
b. Baseline Skiff Surveys
The Applicants will conduct baseline skiff surveys in April of the
year that construction begins. These surveys will document pre-activity
distribution and abundance of sea otters in the project area prior to
the start of construction. A minimum of three skiff-based line transect
surveys will be conducted during each survey event. Additionally, a
survey event will be conducted each April during the construction phase
of the project and the April after construction is completed to
document distribution and abundance after each construction year.
Surveys will be conducted from a skiff or vessel and will encompass
marine waters from a depth of 40 meters to mean high tide.
c. Reporting
Reports on vessel- and land-based activities during construction
and vessel-based monitoring will be faxed or e-mailed to the Service on
a regular basis. Reports will describe hovercraft operations and
construction activities, and northern sea otter monitoring activities
during the reporting period. Frequency and specific content of reports
will be determined based on consultation with the Service.
Endangered Species Act
The proposed activity will occur within the range of the southwest
Alaska DPS of the northern sea otter, which is presently listed as
threatened under the ESA, as amended. The FAA and the Service's
Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field Office in Anchorage, Alaska, had
consulted under Section 7 of the ESA, and concluded that the proposed
activity will not jeopardize the southwest Alaska DPS of the northern
sea otter. However, at the time the consultation occurred, critical
habitat had not been designated. Therefore, we
[[Page 32502]]
are reinitiating consultation with the Applicants to take into
consideration the rescheduled project dates and potential impacts to
critical habitat. We will also reinitiate and complete intra-Service
section 7 consultation prior to finalization of the IHA, which will
include consideration of the new dates and potential impacts to
critical habitat.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The applicant provided an FEA on the project. The Service finds
that this FEA meets NEPA standards for analyzing the effects of the
issuance of this IHA. To obtain a copy of the FEA, contact the
individual identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175, Secretarial Order
3225, and the Department of the Interior's manual at 512 DM 2, we
readily acknowledge our responsibility to communicate meaningfully with
federally recognized Tribes on a Government-to-Government basis. On
July 24, 2008, we contacted the Native Village of Akutan to offer
Government-to-Government consultation on this project. The Tribal
Administrator declined the offer, stating that their Tribe fully
supports the development of an airport on Akun Island.
Proposed Authorization
The Service proposes to issue an IHA for small numbers of northern
sea otters harassed incidentally by the Applicants while conducting the
Akutan Airport, Alaska, Airport Construction and Hovercraft Operation.
The final IHA would specify the starting date and ending date (1 year
later) for the authorization. Authorization for incidental take beyond
the period specified in the final IHA will require a request for
renewal.
The final IHA would also incorporate the mitigation, monitoring,
and reporting requirements discussed in this proposal. The Applicants
will be responsible for following those requirements. These
authorizations do not allow the intentional taking of northern sea
otters.
If the level of activity exceeds that described by the Applicants,
or the level or nature of take exceeds those projected here, the
Service will reevaluate its findings. The Secretary may modify,
suspend, or revoke an authorization if the findings are not accurate or
the conditions described herein are not being met.
Request for Public Comments
The Service requests interested persons to submit comments and
information concerning this proposed IHA. Consistent with section
101(a)(5)(D)(iii) of the MMPA, we are opening the comment period on
this proposed authorization for 30 days (see ADDRESSES).
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: May 25, 2010.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-13649 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P