Sheldon CCP Comment Form

Pacific Region

Before including your address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comments, you should be aware that your entire comment (including your personal identifying information) may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us to withhold your personal identifying information from public review by checking the box "keep my contact information private," we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will use this information to better serve the public. There is no requirement to provide a response or to use this form. Response is voluntary, and providing your name, organization, and address is optional.

* indicates required fields

City: *

State/Province:

Please use the drop-down list to select "State/Province" if country is United States of America. Otherwise, please use textbox.

Country:

Postal Code: *

First Name:

Middle Initial:

Last Name:

Organization:

when Organization is entered please select 'Member' or 'Official Representative'.

Member
Official Representative

Address 1:

Address 2:

Email:

Keep my contact information private

We want to know which alternatives you feel best address each major planning issue identified.
For each topic below, indicate which alternative you prefer and feel free to include specific
comments, suggestions, or questions in the in the boxes provided. You can enter up to 35,000
characters in the comment field (approximately equivalent to a 10 page letter). If you wish to
send us more detailed comments, you may submit them in hardcopy by clicking on the Form To
Mail link above.

* You must enter a Comment to be able to submit the form.

Managing feral horses and burros has been identified as the most important issue for Sheldon Refuge.
Which alternative for management of feral horse and burros appeals to you the most?

Alternative 1 (No Action/ Current Management)
Alternative 2 (Intensive Management -U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Preferred)
Alternative 3 (Low Intensity Management)

If you have specific comments related to management of feral horses and burros, please include them here.

Which alternative for fish stocking do you agree with most?

Alternative 1 (No Action/ Current Management)
Alternative 2 (Intensive Management - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Preferred)
Alternative 3 (Low Intensity Management)

If you have specific comments related fish stocking or fisheries management, please include them here.

Which alternative do you think best addresses resource concerns related to roads,
campgrounds, abandoned livestock water developments, and other facilities?

Alternative 1 (No Action/ Current Management)
Alternative 2 (Intensive Management - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Preferred)
Alternative 3 (Low Intensity Management)

If you have specific comments related facilities management, please include them here.

Routes for vehicle use within Sheldon Refuge need to be formally designated. Which alternative do
you think strikes the best balances between resource conservation and access for wildlife dependant
recreation?

Alternative 1 (No Action/ Current Management)
Alternative 2 (Intensive Management - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Preferred)
Alternative 3 (Low Intensity Management)

If you have specific comments related public access, please include them here.

The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service could recommend lands be added or removed from the 1974 wilderness proposal for Sheldon Refuge.
Which alternative would you support?

Alternative 1 (No Action/ Current Management)
Alternative 2 (Intensive Management - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Preferred)
Alternative 3 (Low Intensity Management)

If you have specific comments related wilderness recommendations, please include them here.

General comments for the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge CCP/EIS.

Last updated: August 25, 2010