|
Historically,
farmers in the Grasslands area of the western San Joaquin Valley have
discharged subsurface agricultural drainwater through wetland channels
in the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex (Refuges) to the San
Joaquin River. This drainwater contains extraordinarily elevated
concentrations of selenium,
boron, chromium,
molybdenum, and extremely high concentrations of various salts that disrupt
the normal ionic balance of the aquatic system. State health advisories
for consumption of fish and waterfowl have been put into effect for the
Grasslands area, and warnings not to eat fish have been posted at the
Refuges. In 1985, the San Luis Drain was closed due to selenium
poisoning of waterbirds at a reservoir in the Kesterson National Wildlife
Refuge at the terminus of the Drain. The
Drain, constructed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), had been
conceived as the solution to valley-wide problems of disposal of agricultural
drainwater. Due to environmental concerns and budget constraints,
the Drain had never been completed as originally planned. The constructed
portion of the Drain had been used only to convey subsurface agricultural
drainwater from the Westland Water District in the western San Joaquin
Valley. Farms in the adjacent Grasslands area never used the Drain,
but discharged toxic subsurface drainwater through wetland channels in
the Refuges to the San Joaquin River. Discharge from Grasslands
area farmers continued to contaminate Refuge water delivery channels after
the closure of Kesterson Reservoir.
Methods:
To address this problem, a proposal to reopen the San Luis Drain and extend
it to Mud Slough, a natural waterway in the Refuges, was implemented by
the USBR in September 1996 with support from other federal and state agencies.
An interagency group is cooperatively monitoring and evaluating the effects
of the Project to insure that the Project does not result in a net degradation
of the ecosystem, and to determine whether the Project should be continued
beyond the first 2 years of operation. The responsibility of the U.. Fish
and Wildlife Service (Service) in this program is to collect samples of
potentially affected fish and wildlife for analysis of levels of selenium
and boron and provide an interpretation of environmental risk of the project
within the Refuge and beyond. The
primary contaminant of concern in this study is selenium because of the
propensity of this element to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms and because
of the well-known history of poisoning and terratogenesis caused by selenium
in drain water in this area. Nearly a dozen inorganic constituents in
drainage water, however, are of potential toxicological interest, especially
boron.
Baseline
samples were collected from two sites on Salt Slough, four sites on
Mud Slough, two sites in the San Luis Drain, and from one reference
site at East Big Lake, which receives little selenium contaminated drainwater.
Experience gained in the early years of baseline sampling for this Project
led to the identification of four sampling times based on historic water
use and drainage practices and on seasonal use of wetland resources
by fish and wildlife. They are in November, March, June, and August.
Matrices sampled and parameters measured Samples of biota, water,
and sediment were collected concurrently at each site and analyzed for
selenium and boron. At each site, standard water quality parameters
including temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and electrical conductance
(as specific conductance) were also measured with a Sonde hydrolab.
Aquatic specimens, water and sediment were collected at various
sites.
Conclusions:
Analyses completed
to date indicate that selenium concentrations have begun to decline
in the fish and invertebrates of Salt Slough, the principal wetlands
channel from which drainwater has been removed by the Project.
After the Drain began discharging drainwater into Mud Slough, selenium
concentrations in the most common fish (mosquitofish and inland silversides)
both upstream and downstream of the discharge point rose substantially
during the first six months of operation of the Project. These
concentrations have more recently declined somewhat, but are still above
pre-project levels. Continued biological monitoring is critical to determine
whether trends continue downward sufficiently to justify continuation
of this Project. Within a month after the reopening of the San
Luis Drain to carry Grasslands area agricultural drainwater, the worst
affected Refuge ecosystem (Mud Slough) exhibited bioaccumulation of
selenium to well above hazardous concentrations. In the last six to
nine months, selenium concentrations in the biota have begun to trend
downward, but remain sufficiently elevated to be of ecological concern.
While drainwater was formerly discharged to Mud Slough it is now the
predominant source of water and this dominance persists year round.
In the portions of the Refuges that were to benefit from the Project,
principally Salt Slough, reductions in selenium have thus far been slight
to moderate but statistically and toxicologically significant.
It remains to be seen whether the overall effect of the Project on the
wetland ecosystems in the area will prove to be significantly negative
or positive. Continued monitoring of the biota is essential to a sound
evaluation of the project impact. On this assessment rests the
fate of the Grasslands Bypass Project, a project which has combined
all nonpoint sub-surface drainage sources into one monitorable and manageable
source. Within the year this project will be "regulated" by a
waste discharge requirement under state law. It tentatively appears
that the first year result of the project on selenium loads was to reduce
the annual selenium load from 10,000 lbs in 1996 to 7,300 lbs in 1997.
Learn more by reading the following
full report: Beckon, W.N. , Henderson,J.D. , Maurer,T.C. , and Schwarzbach,
S.E. , Biological Effects of the Reopening of the San
Luis Drain (Grasslands Bypass Project) to Carry Subsurface Irrigation Drainwater,
USFWS, Div. of Env. Contaminants, Sacramento, CA., Sept. 1997.
Return
to the Sacramento Field Office Reports
Visit the: Pacific Region - Environmental
Contaminants-Investigating
and Monitoring
Visit the: USFWS-
Pacific Region Environmental Contaminants Home
Page |