North Florida Field Office
Frequently Asked Questions - ESA Five-Year review for the Florida Manatee - Reopened and Expanded
Q1: What action is the Fish and Wildlife Service taking?
A1: The Service is conducting a five-year review of the Florida manatee.
Q2: What is a five-year review?
A2: A five-year review is an Endangered Species Act (ESA) mandated process which is conducted to ensure that the listing classification of a species as either threatened or endangered is still accurate. It is a verification process with a definitive outcome: either the review does or does not indicate a change in classification may be warranted. As the five-year review is not a rulemaking in and of itself, it provides a "recommendation" rather than a "determination."
Q3: Why will it take five-years to do an assessment?
A3: The five-year status review looks back at least five-years in reviewing data and information, and is a requirement under the Endangered Species Act. The ESA requires that a status assessment be conducted at least every five years for federally-listed species. However, it will not take us five-years to complete.
While there are no hard deadlines for completion, we are looking to complete the assessment and make our determination by late this year.
Q4: Why conduct a five-year review of the Florida manatee?
A4: Research, monitoring programs and conservation actions have been carried out and are ongoing by Federal and non-Federal (State, private, tribal) entities. As a result, new information is constantly becoming available. Although this information has been made public since the time of listing and the Service has continued to use the best available information under its Endangered Species Act (ESA) responsibilities, this information has not been fully evaluated under the ESA's five-year review requirement.
Q5: What information is considered in the review or being requested from the public?
A5: For this review, we are particularly interested in any new information and data which has become available since publication of the third revision of the Florida manatee recovery plan in 2001. Categories of information include:
To be of greatest use to biologists and conservation managers conducting the review, information submitted should be supported by documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Q6: When is the deadline for submitting information?
A6: In order for new information to be considered as part of the current review, the information and any supporting documentation must be received by JUNE 13, 2006. (Comment period reopened on March 24, 2006.)
Q7: How do I submit information and data?
A7: You may submit information via one of the following methods:
By email: email@example.com and include “Manatee 5-year Review” in subject line. Please note that electronic attachments larger than 3MB should be submitted on CD-ROM via mail, as our email system limits the size of attachments to 3MB or smaller. We can accept document and graphic files in the following formats: MS Word, WordPerfect, RTF, Text, PDF, EPS, JPEG (JPG), and TIFF (TIF).
By Fax: 904-232-2404 (Comments and brief supporting documents only please. Documents containing more than 20 pages or sized greater than 8.5” x 11” should be submitted via mail.)
Q8: What will happen as a result of this review?
A8: The Service will determine whether or not a change in the Federal classification of the Florida manatee may be warranted. Our determination could include any one of the following recommendations:
Any change to the federal classification of the Florida manatee would require a separate rulemaking process.
Q9: If, as a result of the review, the Service determines that a change to the Florida manatee's status from endangered to threatened may be warranted, will such a change reduce the level of protection for the species?
A9: No, all current Federal conservation and protection measures would remain in force. A change (reclassification) to threatened status would be based on the best scientific and commercially available data and require a separate rulemaking process.
Q10: Will the public be given an opportunity to participate in any status change the Service might consider as a result of the review?
A10: Yes. Any change would require a separate formal rulemaking process, including ample opportunity for public review and comment. No change in classification would occur until the completion of that process; so the Florida manatee would remain listed as endangered until we go through the formal rulemaking process.
Q11: How is the manatee currently listed?
A11: The West Indian ( Florida ) manatee is federally-listed as endangered throughout the Southeastern United States , Caribbean Sea , and South America . The species' official listing may be found in 32 FR 4001 and 35 FR 18319 .
Q12: How does the Service determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?
A12: The Endangered Species Act defines “endangered” as “…in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range…” whereas “threatened” is defined as “…is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range…”
Section 4(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) establishes that we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five following factors:
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act also requires that our determination be made on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.
Q13: When would the Service be able to remove the manatee from the Endangered Species List?
A13: A decision to de-list any species must be supported by the best scientific and commercial data available and only considered if such data substantiates that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the following reasons: (1) the species is considered extinct; (2) the species is considered to be recovered; and/or (3) the original data available when the species was listed, or the interpretation of such data, were in error. Any change in Federal classification, including removal from the Federal endangered and threatened species list, would require a separate rulemaking process, including ample opportunity for public review and comment.
Q14: How can I stay current or find out more information on the Florida manatee and your conservation efforts?
A14: The most current information is available online at our web site: http://www.fws.gov/northflorida.
Updated 5-year Review Fact Sheet 2006 FR 5-year Review Notice 2005 FR 5-year Review Notice
2006 5-year Review News Release Manatee Information Home
Last modified March 28, 2006
USFWS, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS, permit reviews, projects, species recovery, Florida, Fish and Wildlife, florida manatee, wildlife, endangered, threatened, endangered species act, ESA, marine mammal protection act, MMPA, eagles, whooping cranes, cranes, florida scrub-jay, scrub jay, jay, scrub, sea turtles, loggerhead, kemps ridley, kemp's ridley sea turtle, olive ridley, olive ridley seaturtle, hawksbill,hawksbill sea turtle, hawks bill, green sea turtle, leatherback, turtle, red-cockaded woodpeckers, woodpeckers, RCW, beach mouse, beach mice, mouse, snake, indigo sanke, recovery, regulation, regulatory, permit reviews, Section Seven, section 7, section 10, habitat, habitat conservation, habitat conservation plan, HCP, incidental take, incidental take permits, reviews, consultation, north florida, nassau, duval, clay, st. johns, saint johns, bradford, putnam, flagler, volusia, seminole, orange, brevard, lake, sumter, hernando, pasco, pinellas, hillsborough, manatee, citrus, levy, dixie, alachua, marion, union, baker, columbia, suwannee, hamilton, madison, taylor, lafayette, gilchrist, tampa, jacksonville, gainesville, crystal river, orlando, st. petersburg, daytona, daytona beach, st. augustine, saint augustine, saint petersburg, orange park, lake city, palatka, Blue Spring, homosassa, springs, boating, resource, natural resources, recreation, property, development, growth, impacts, environment, enviromental, environmental impacts, recovery plans, recovery implementation, safe harbor, habitat, critical habitat, critical habitat designation