U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Logo

USFWS graphic title bar

North Florida Field Office

Fact Sheet on Re-examination of Decision for 1998 Florida Black Bear Petition Finding


Background

The Florida Black Bear occurred historically in all of Florida, southern Georgia, and southern Alabama. The bear still occurs in all three states, but in reduced numbers. Core populations are generally confined to less accessible swamp and forest areas on public conservation lands and adjacent private lands. An estimated 1,600-3,000 bears remain. The main Georgia and Florida populations are secure, but the small remaining Alabama population is likely to be gone in the near future.

In 1990, a Florida resident petitioned the Service to list the Florida black bear under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).

In December 1998, the Service issued its 12-month finding that listing the Florida black bear was not warranted because healthy bear populations occur in secure habitat in four areas: Apalachicola National Forest and adjacent lands, Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge–Osceola National Forest and adjacent lands, Ocala National Forest and adjacent lands, and Big Cypress National Preserve and adjacent lands. The Service removed the species from candidate status at that time.

The Defenders of Wildlife, the Fund for Animals, and the Sierra Club challenged the Service’s 1998 finding in their 1999 lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for D.C.

Issue

In December 2001, the U.S. District Court for D.C. upheld most aspects of the Service’s original 1998 finding, but directed the Service to reexamine and clarify its previous decision regarding "inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms."

Status

Pursuant to the Court’s order, the Service has reexamined the regulatory mechanisms in place at the time of the 1998 finding. The Service has determined that regulatory mechanisms established by Federal and State laws, regulations and policies were and continue to be adequate. As a result, the Florida black bear does not require listing under the ESA. The notice of this action was published in the Federal Register on January 14, 2004.

Questions?

The Federal Register notice, as well as this fact sheet, frequently asked questions, and other related documents are available online at http://www.fws.gov/northflorida.

If you have specific questions or need special assistance, please contact the North Florida Field Office at 904-731-3332.


black graphic pointer - pointing to right Federal Register Notice black graphic pointer - pointing to right News Release black graphic pointer - pointing to right Frequently Asked Questions black graphic pointer - pointing to right Home


Send comments on our web site or general questions to northflorida@fws.gov
If you need special assistance please contact the Public Affairs Officer at chuck_underwood@fws.gov

Last modified February 16, 2005

USFWS, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS, permit reviews, projects, species recovery, Florida, Fish and Wildlife, florida manatee, wildlife, endangered, threatened, endangered species act, ESA, marine mammal protection act, MMPA, eagles, whooping cranes, cranes, florida scrub-jay, scrub jay, jay, scrub, sea turtles, loggerhead, kemps ridley, kemp's ridley sea turtle, olive ridley, olive ridley seaturtle, hawksbill,hawksbill sea turtle, hawks bill, green sea turtle, leatherback, turtle, red-cockaded woodpeckers, woodpeckers, RCW, beach mouse, beach mice, mouse, snake, indigo sanke, recovery, regulation, regulatory, permit reviews, Section Seven, section 7, section 10, habitat, habitat conservation, habitat conservation plan, HCP, incidental take, incidental take permits, reviews, consultation, north florida, nassau, duval, clay, st. johns, saint johns, bradford, putnam, flagler, volusia, seminole, orange, brevard, lake, sumter, hernando, pasco, pinellas, hillsborough, manatee, citrus, levy, dixie, alachua, marion, union, baker, columbia, suwannee, hamilton, madison, taylor, lafayette, gilchrist, tampa, jacksonville, gainesville, crystal river, orlando, st. petersburg, daytona, daytona beach, st. augustine, saint augustine, saint petersburg, orange park, lake city, palatka, Blue Spring, homosassa, springs, boating, resource, natural resources, recreation, property, development, growth, impacts, environment, enviromental, environmental impacts, recovery plans, recovery implementation, safe harbor, habitat, critical habitat, critical habitat designation