In
April 1999, the House of Representatives passed a resolution
directing the Corps of Engineers to investigate the potential
for environmental restoration in the Port of New York /
New Jersey. Then in June 2000, the Corps’ New York District
(District) issued a reconnaissance report that demonstrated
a strong federal interest in environmental restoration within
the Port District and called for a detailed feasibility
study of environmental restoration within the entire Hudson-Raritan
Estuary (HRE). This report recommended developing a Comprehensive
Restoration Implementation Plan (CRIP) that would use an
ecosystem approach to address the overall restoration needs
of the estuary, rather than focusing on individual projects.
The report also recommended conducting smaller sub-basin
studies to address areas of special interest or concern
which would be linked to the larger plan by the CRIP.
At about the same time, the U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service (Service) was holding a series of stakeholder
work sessions to garner commitment to help protect the Hackensack
Meadowlands. The Meadowlands had already been identified
by the EPA’s Harbor Estuary Program (HEP) as an area of
special concern. The District’s reconnaissance study recognized
the HEP as having made extensive progress toward a system-wide
approach to the HRE, and the CRIP was to become strongly
linked with the work of the HEP. Consequently, the District
was invited to the Meadowlands workshop held in the Offices
of Representative Steve Rothman (NJ9th). Congressman Rothman,
whose District encompasses the Meadowlands, had made its
protection and preservation a priority. At the workshop the Congressman drew a line
around the remaining open spaces of the Meadowlands and
expressed a desire that those present work together to create
a Meadowlands reserve.
Of special interest was the approach identified
in the HRE reconnaissance report for looking in detail at
sub-basins of the larger estuary. The Meadowlands seemed
to fill this bill perfectly. However, to use federal funds
a non-federal partner was required. Into this role stepped
the newly renamed New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (Commission).
Once, under the old name of the Hackensack Meadowlands Development
Commission it was focused on developing the area within
environmental guidelines. The Commission is now emerging
as a major advocate for land acquisition and restoration.
Three partners have thus been brought together
at a very fortuitous time. The Service’s New Jersey Field
Office has been directed by Congress to assist the District
in conducting a feasibility study toward the development
of the CRIP and to prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan for the Meadowlands. Similarly, the District has been
directed by Congress to address the feasibility of environmental
restoration within the Port District, including the Meadowlands.
And the Commission has embarked on a new management plan
that stresses land acquisition and restoration of the remaining
open spaces in the Meadowlands. It’s a natural that all
three pool their expertise and resources, and concrete progress
has been made toward doing just that:
1. The District and the Service have laid
out a comprehensive work plan to identify the major problems
and their potential solutions.
2. The District and the Commission are
also investigating legal and funding mechanisms under which
they can form a partnership to pursue the development of
a restoration plan for the Meadowlands.
3. Finally, the District, the Service,
and the Commission have identified their respective roles
and responsibilities in maximizing resources and expediting
the planning process.
The
District has been working to translate the approach and
goals agreed upon into specific tasks, with costs and times
to complete each. The approach will identify specific sites
for restoration, targeting those that have a greater potential
for expanding existing natural tracts or connecting isolated
pockets. The end result of this effort will be the Project
Management Plan (PMP), essentially a roadmap that will identify
what has to be done, who will do the work, and when it will
be available. Once approved by the partners, it will be
signed by all three as a Memorandum of Agreement and will
serve as the basis for the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement
between the Corps and Commission as well as any future fund
transfers between the Corps and the Service.
Much excitement exists within all three
agencies as they are poised on the brink of great things
for the Meadowlands. In the past these agencies have not
always seen eye-to-eye. Now they are setting aside their
differences to achieve the common goal. When they succeed,
a vibrant urban estuary will have been brought back from
further degradation and eventual loss, and a significant
commitment to the ecosystem of the region fulfilled. This
is government as it should work: building meaningful partnerships.