|
|
Desert Tortoise Recovery Office
Implementation of Assessment Team Recommendations
While time and funding limitations preclude a fully collaborative recovery planning process at this time, the Service will begin addressing several issues and implementing additional recommendations in the assessment report to improve the scientific foundations for desert tortoise recovery. These steps extend beyond the current recovery plan revision as long-term commitments to build relationships for broad-based collaboration in recovery implementation and subsequent reviews. The table below lists the key issues identified in the assessment report (pages 5-7) and describes current action items to address these issues.
| Issue from Assessment Report/Action Item (modified 1/27/07) |
|
Implementation Start Date |
| 1. |
Information for Decision-Making About Desert Tortoise Recovery |
|
|
| |
 |
Report baseline data on desert tortoise populations |
|
|
| |
|
 |
1. |
Range-wide monitoring summary report completed |
 |
Oct 2006 |
| |
|
Formalize population monitoring plan |
|
|
| |
|
|
2. |
Complete study plan outline (in progress) |
|
Spring 2007 |
| |
|
|
3. |
Complete full study plan |
|
Spring 2008 |
| |
|
Address threats through effectiveness monitoring |
|
|
| |
|
|
4. |
Incorporate into revised recovery plan |
|
Sept 2007 |
| |
|
|
5. |
Develop decision support system to integrate effectiveness monitoring and adaptive management |
|
Feb 2007 |
| |
|
|
6. |
Facilitate increased research in this area |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| 2. |
Implementation of 1994 Recovery Plan |
|
|
| | | Establish short- and long-term performance measures |
|
|
| |
|
|
7. |
Incorporate measures into revised recovery plan |
|
Sept 2007 |
| |
|
Facilitate recovery implementation |
|
|
| |
|
|
8. |
Work with regional recovery implementation teams (including government and non-government stakeholders) |
|
Post-final recovery plan revision |
| 3. |
Funding of Desert Tortoise Recovery Efforts |
|
|
| |
|
Improve recovery funding |
|
|
| |
|
|
9. |
Identify/develop funding partners |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| |
|
Identify/clarify funding priorities |
|
|
| |
|
|
10. |
Incorporate priorities in revised recovery plan |
|
Sept 2007 |
| |
|
|
11. |
Integrate funding priorities with decision support system |
|
Jan 2008 |
| 4. |
Revised Recovery Plan |
October 16, 2009 valign="top">
| |
|
Identify regional threats and address accordingly |
|
|
| |
|
|
12. |
Incorporate current information into revised recovery plan |
|
Sept 2007 |
| |
|
|
13. |
Facilitate research to identify relative importance of different threats (Action Item 5 also relevant) |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| 5. |
Trust Among Participants in Desert Tortoise Issues |
|
|
| |
|
Build long-term trust with/among stakeholders (see Action Item 8) |
|
|
| |
|
|
14. |
Commit to/continue written reporting mechanisms (Action Item 5 also relevant) |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| |
|
|
15. |
Maintain up-to-date DTRO web page with information/status of current activities |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| 6. |
Institutional Arrangements and Capacity for Collaboration and |
|
|
| 7. |
Design and Procedures for Proposed Collaborative Process |
|
|
| |
|
Build capacity for more formal collaboration in recovery implementation and future recovery plan revision |
|
|
| |
|
|
16. |
Clarify role of MOG (also addresses Assessment Report Recommendation #6, page 30) |
|
Jan 2007 |
| |
|
|
17. |
Increase coordination and consistency among FWS offices |
|
Current / Ongoing |
| |
|
|
18. |
Incorporate collaborative recovery implementation teams (Action Item 8) into revised recovery plan |
|
Sept 2007 |
| |
Assessment Report Recommendation #2 (pages 20-21) |
|
|
| |
|
Explain or clarify: |
|
|
| |
|
|
a. |
how the concepts of recovery units, distinct population segments, and desert wildlife management areas (DWMAs) fit within the recovery planning process; |
|
|
| |
|
|
b. |
the relationship between mitigation requirements under a Section 10 take permit and permittee’s responsibilities regarding implementation of the revised recovery plan; and |
|
|
| |
|
|
c. |
the possibility that the revised recovery planning process could result in i) modifying the location, boundaries, or number of recovery units; ii) adjusting the location, boundaries, or number of DWMAs; iii) establishing “Safe Harbor” agreements with private landowners; iv) revising critical habitat designation for the desert tortoise; and v) delisting the desert tortoise by recovery unit or region as recovery criteria are achieved. |
|
|
| |
|
|
19. |
Clarify in “foundations” paper |
 |
Jan 2007 |
|
Last updated:
October 19, 2009