Mountain-Prairie Region
12-MONTH ADMINISTRATIVE FINDING, BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG
Table 1. Summary of Estimates of Black-tailed Prairie Dog Occupied Habitat in Various Areas for Selected Dates (estimates in thousands of acres)
|
State or Country |
Historic |
BSFW (1961) |
Other Recent |
Mulhern & Knowles (1995) |
Knowles (1995) |
BFFRF Survey (1998) |
States 1998 |
Knowles (1998) |
USFWS (1999) |
|
Arizona |
650 (AGF&P) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Colorado |
3,000 (Clark 1989)7,000 (Knowles 1998) |
96 |
89 in 1979 (Van Pelt in prep.) |
<100 |
326 |
973 in 1990 (CO Dept Ag) |
44 |
93 |
|
|
Kansas |
2,000 (Lantz 1903)2,500 (Knowles 1998) |
50 |
57 (Smith 1958)36 (Henderson & Little 1973)47 (Vanderhoof & Robel 1992) |
47 |
47 |
147 |
36 |
42 |
|
|
Montana |
1,471 (Flath & Clark 1986)6,000 (Knowles 1998) |
28 |
125 (Flath & Clark 1986)>100 (Campbell 1989) |
88 |
88 |
66 (MT FW&P) |
65 |
65 |
|
|
Nebraska |
6,000 (Knowles 1998) |
30 |
15 in 1971 (Lock 1973) |
60 |
60 |
80 |
60-80 (NE G&P) |
60 |
60 |
|
New Mexico |
>6,640 (Bailey 1932) |
17 |
137 (Bodenchuck 1981) |
497 |
107 |
15 |
39 |
||
|
North Dakota |
2,000 (Knowles 1998) |
20 |
>7 (Grondahl 1973)10 (Stockrahm 1979)25 in 1999 (Sidle pers. comm.) |
21 |
20 |
15 |
30 (ND G&F) |
20 |
25 |
|
Oklahoma |
950 (Knowles 1998) |
15 |
10 (Tyler 1968)15 (Lewis & Hassien 1973)18 (Shackford et al. 1990)8.6 in 1999 (Lomolino in litt.) |
10 |
70 |
18 (OK Dept WC) |
<9.5 |
9 |
|
|
South Dakota |
1,757 (Linder et al. 1972) |
33 |
37 in 1967 (Henderson et al 1974)60 in 1968 (Rose 1973)700 in 1980 (Tschetter 1988)184 in 1987 (Tschetter 1988)147 in 1999 (Sidle pers. comm.) |
247 |
245 |
175 |
231 in 1996 (SD GF&P) |
245 |
147 |
|
Texas |
58,000 (Bailey 1905) |
26 |
>13 (Cottam & Caroline 1965)90 (Cheatheam 1977)>68 (Lair & Mecham 1991) |
30 |
227 |
23 |
71 |
||
|
Wyoming |
16,000 (Knowles 1998) |
49 |
133 in 1971 (Clark 1973) |
204 |
131-204 |
422 |
131-204 in1987(WYG&F)362 (WY Dept Ag) |
70-180 |
125 |
|
United States |
111,000 (Knowles 1998) |
364 |
1,359 |
1,686 |
677 |
676 |
|||
|
Canada |
1.5-2 (Knowles 1998) |
1.9 (Millson 1976)1.6 (Laing 1986)2.3 (Fargey pers. comm. 1998) |
2 |
2 |
|||||
|
Mexico |
1,384 (Ceballos et al. 1993) |
136 (Ceballos et al. 1993) |
90 |
90 |
|||||
|
N. America |
104,000 (Anderson et al. 1986)99,000-247,000 (Miller et al. 1996)384,000 (Seton 1953) |
769 |
768 |
1
Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife (1961).2
Black-footed Ferret Recovery Foundation phone survey, September 1998.3
State Agency responses to 1998 petition and 90-day finding.4
Fish and Wildlife Services best estimate of current occupied habitat (1999).5
Includes all prairie dog species present.Table 2. Geographical Information System Estimation of Potential Black-tailed Prairie Dog Occupied Habitat (in acres).
|
State |
Total Range |
Croplands Within Range |
Grass/Shrub Within Range |
Potential Habitat |
20 Percent of Potential Habitat* |
|
Arizona |
8,516,730 |
345,862 |
6,635,691 |
6,981,553 |
1,396,311 |
|
Colorado |
33,151,600 |
11,601,300 |
15,621,810 |
27,223,110 |
5,444,622 |
|
Kansas |
38,136,400 |
27,839,336 |
9,676,833 |
37,516,169 |
7,503,234 |
|
Montana |
66,140,400 |
15,841,388 |
37,496,108 |
53,337,496 |
10,667,499 |
|
Nebraska |
46,719,300 |
25,578,936 |
19,526,548 |
45,105,484 |
9,021,097 |
|
New Mexico |
53,838,600 |
2,536,731 |
42,213,264 |
44,749,995 |
8,949,999 |
|
North Dakota |
11,357,400 |
5,808,501 |
5,194,639 |
11,003,140 |
2,200,628 |
|
Oklahoma |
24,849,900 |
15,953,241 |
7,170,891 |
23,124,132 |
4,624,826 |
|
South Dakota |
35,036,500 |
13,921,928 |
18,131,964 |
32,053,892 |
6,410,778 |
|
Texas |
93,048,100 |
23,558,038 |
59,957,784 |
83,515,822 |
16,703,164 |
|
Wyoming |
37,354,300 |
3,477,034 |
25,452,430 |
28,929,464 |
5,785,893 |
|
Total |
448,149,230 |
146,462,295 |
247,077,962 |
393,540,257 |
78,708,051 |
* It has been estimated that historically, approximately 20 percent of all potential habitat was inhabited by the species at any given time (Whicker and Detling 1988).
Table 3. Listing Priority Guidance for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (48 FR 43098).
| Magnitude of Threat | Immediacy of Threat | Taxonomy | LPN |
| High | Imminent | Monotypic genus | 1 |
| Species | 2 | ||
| Subspecies/population | 3 | ||
| Non-Imminent | Monotypic genus | 4 | |
| Species | 5 | ||
| Subspecies/population | 6 | ||
| Moderate to Low | Imminent | Monotypic genus | 7 |
| Species | 8 | ||
| Subspecies/population | 9 | ||
| Non-Imminent | Monotypic genus | 10 | |
| Species | 11 | ||
| Subspecies/population | 12 |
Table 4. Region 6 Listing Priorities as of November 1999.
|
SPECIES |
LEAD OFFICE |
STATUS |
LISTING PRIORITY |
|
Proposed Species |
|||
|
Colorado Butterfly Plant |
Cheyenne, WY |
Proposed (T) March 24, 1998 |
|
|
Desert Yellowhead |
Cheyenne, WY |
Proposed (T) December, 22, 1998 |
|
|
Lynx |
Helena, MT |
Proposed (T) July, 8, 1998 |
6-month extension to January 2000 |
|
Mountain Plover |
Grand Junction, CO |
Proposed (T) February 16, 1999 |
|
|
Pending Proposed Rule |
|||
|
2 plant species |
|
Previous Candidates |
Proposed rule submitted to WO |
|
Court Orders |
|||
|
Virgin River Chub Critical Habitat |
Salt Lake, UT |
Court-ordered designation due January 20, 2000 |
|
|
Piping Plover Critical Habitat |
Pierre, SD |
*In settlement negotiations |
|
|
Candidate Species |
|||
|
Sicklefin Chub |
Bismarck, ND |
Candidate (petitioned) |
2 |
|
Sturgeon Chub |
Bismarck, ND |
Candidate (petitioned) |
2 |
|
Fat-whorled (Bonneville) Pond Snail |
Salt Lake, UT |
Candidate |
2 |
|
Sleeping-Ute Milk-Vetch |
Lakewood, CO |
Candidate |
2 |
|
Boreal Toad (Southern Rocky Mtn population) |
Grand Junction, CO |
Candidate (warranted but precluded) |
3 |
|
Arkansas Darter |
Manhattan, KS |
Candidate |
5 |
|
Graham Beardtongue |
Lakewood, CO |
Candidate |
5 |
|
Parachute Beardtongue |
Lakewood, CO |
Candidate |
5 |
|
White River Beardtongue |
Salt Lake, UT |
Candidate |
6 |
|
Swift Fox |
Pierre, SD |
Candidate (warranted but precluded) |
8 |
|
Aquarius Indian Paintbrush |
Salt Lake, UT |
Candidate |
8 |
|
Horseshoe Milk-Vetch |
Salt Lake, UT |
Candidate |
8 |
* Action pending. Settlement could require completion of critical habitat for this species in a timeframe which would preclude completion of other listing actions.