Mountain-Prairie Region
 Endangered Species Program

Region 6 Peer Review Agenda

Peer Review of Scientific Information

Ensuring the Quality and Credibility of Information

Checklist

This checklist describes information that will be posted on the Web when we conduct a peer review, following guidelines detailed in the OMB Peer Review Bulletin.

About the document

  • title

  • short description of the document

  • estimated dissemenation date of the final version of the document

About the peer review process

  • kind of peer review that will be conducted
     ◦  panel,
     ◦  individual letters, National Academy of Sciences review, or
     ◦  other procedure approved by OMB

  • anticipated number of reviewers

  • reviewer selection method
     ◦  reviewers selected by the Service or
     ◦  reviewers selected by a designated outside organization

  • primary disciplines or expertise needed outside organization

  • estimated state date of peer review

About public participation

  • opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed (Indicate whether such public comments will be sought and describe how comments are to be submitted.)

  • indicate whether the public, including scientific or professional organizations, will be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers.

Contact

  • contact information for one or more staff regarding this peer review

 


 

Privacy, Disclaimer and Copyrights
Children's Privacy Policy

Return to the Mountain-Prairie Home Page
Return to the Endangered Species Home Page