Re-Opening the Public Comment Period on the Proposed Rule to Delist the Bald Eagle Under the Endangered Species Act

Questions and Answers

What is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposing to do regarding the bald eagle?

 

In 1999, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to remove the bald eagle from the endangered and threatened species list due to its population rebound.  The Service has continued to work since then to respond to the comments received and to determine the best way to manage bald eagles under two other Federal laws that will continue to protect the species once it is no longer protected by the Endangered Species Act.  The Service believes that the public should again have the opportunity to comment on the proposed delisting in light of the subsequent development of the draft voluntary management guidelines and the proposed regulatory definition of the term “disturb” under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, as well as any new information that may inform this decision. The comment period also extends to the draft voluntary guidelines and proposed definition as well.

 

Once the draft guidelines and the proposed definition are finalized and the Service completes a final review of the science behind the original proposal, the Service will make a final decision on the delisting of the bald eagle.

 

What is the status of the bald eagle today? 

 

The bald eagle is protected as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act except in Alaska where it was never listed under the Act and Hawaii where it was never known to occur.  The bald eagle will continue to have the full protection of the ESA in the lower 48 states until it is officially removed from the list of threatened and endangered species.  It is also protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA).  Protections under both of these laws will continue should the bald eagle be removed from the list of threatened and endangered species.

 

Why is the Fish and Wildlife Service proposing to remove the bald eagle from the list of threatened and endangered species?

 

The bald eagle population in the lower 48 states has recovered from a population estimated at 417 nesting pairs in 1963, to a current population of an estimated 7,066 breeding pairs. The threats to the species have been reduced; reproductive success has increased to a healthy level; and the population is growing and distributed across 47 of the lower 48 states (Vermont does not currently have a nesting population of bald eagles). Therefore, the Service has determined that the bald eagle no longer warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act.

 

Why has the Service taken so long to act on the 1999 delisting proposal?

 

The bald eagle is wide ranging, with nesting populations in almost every state.  Therefore, the Service needs to ensure that the action it takes is appropriate for the species range-wide.

 

In addition, the eagle has its own law, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .  Congress passed this law in 1940 to protect our national symbol.  If the species is removed from the list of threatened and endangered species under the ESA, it will continue to be managed under the BGEPA throughout its range.  It will also be protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

 

What are the protections provided by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)?

 

The BGEPA prohibits anyone, without a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior for very limited scientific or educational purposes, from “taking” bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs.  The Act imposes criminal and civil penalties on anyone (including associations, partnerships and corporations) in the U.S. or within its jurisdiction who, without a permit, takes, possesses, sells, purchases, barters, offers to sell or purchase or barter, transports, exports or imports at any time or in any manner a bald or golden eagle, alive or dead; or any part, nest or egg of these eagles.  The BGEPA defines “take” to include: pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb.

 

What is the definition of “disturb” under the BGEPA?

 

The Service has proposed the following draft definition of the term “disturb” under BGEPA – a definition that is consistent with how resource managers and law enforcement personnel currently interpret the Act:  “To agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to the degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, causing injury, death, or nest abandonment.” 

 

The Service is accepting comments on this definition during the 90-day public comment period.

 

What are the draft National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines?

 

These voluntary guidelines are intended to be used in the event the bald eagle is no longer listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act. They are consistent with current management practices.  If delisted, bald eagles will still be protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.  The Service developed the draft guidelines to advise landowners and others how to avoid take of bald eagles and ensure that bald eagles continue to be protected consistent with existing law.  The guidelines also provide recommended best management practices to provide additional benefits to bald eagles over and above the recommendations for avoiding disturbance.

 

What do the guidelines say?

 

The guidelines recommend buffers around nests when conducting activities that are likely to disturb bald eagles.  The buffer areas serve to screen nesting eagles from noise and visual distractions caused by human activities.  Some activities will have only temporary impacts; the guidelines generally recommend conducting those types of activities outside the nesting season.  If the activity you plan to undertake is not specifically addressed in the guidelines, the Service recommends that you follow the recommendations for the most similar activity, or contact the Service for further guidance. 

 

For more details on the guidelines, please see the draft “National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines” at <http://migratorybirds.fws.gov/BaldEagle.htm>.

 

Is it mandatory to follow these guidelines?

 

No, adhering to the guidelines is not mandatory, but it is recommended.  Following the guidelines will help people avoid violating eagle conservation laws.

 

What activities are covered under the guidelines?

 

The guidelines cover a range of activities including commercial and residential development, outdoor recreation, and natural resource recovery operations that can interfere with bald eagles or permanently degrade or destroy critical bald eagle nesting, roosting and foraging areas. 

 

Do the guidelines apply to abandoned nest sites or nest sites that are not being used by bald eagles?

 

Yes, the guidelines apply to active and inactive nest sites except those nests which have not been used for five consecutive years and are considered abandoned.  In cases where seasonal restrictions on activities are recommended, those restrictions can be lifted around inactive nests once eggs have hatched in the active nests within that territory. 

 

Are the guidelines intended for use in Alaska?

 

Yes, the guidelines are applicable throughout the United States.

 

If I am planning a project around a bald eagle nest site, do I have to consult with the Service?

 

No, you are not required to contact the Service.  However, we encourage you to contact the Service and your state wildlife agency if you have any questions about how the guidelines apply to your situation, or if you want additional information regarding how to protect bald eagles.

 

How can I determine how big a buffer zone should be around a nest tree?

 

First, consult the guidelines.  Most activities can be addressed by reviewing the guidelines.  However, because the size and shape of effective buffer zones can vary depending on the topography, the tolerance demonstrated by the eagles in your area, and other ecological characteristics surrounding the nest site, you may contact the nearest U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office to determine the appropriate size and shape of the buffer zone if you are uncertain about how to apply the guidelines to your particular situation.

 

Are there more things I can do to help protect bald eagles?

 

1.      Protect and preserve communal roost sites, potential nest sites, and important foraging areas.  Retain mature trees and old growth stands wherever possible, particularly within ½ mile from water. 

 

2.      Avoid potentially disruptive activities and development in the eagles’ direct flight path between their nest and roost sites and important foraging areas. 

 

3.      Locate long-term and permanent water-dependent facilities away from important eagle foraging areas.

 

4.      Avoid recreational and commercial boating and fishing near eagle foraging areas during peak feeding times (usually early to mid morning and late afternoon), except where eagles have demonstrated tolerance to such activity.

 

5.      Do not use explosives within ½ mile (or within 1 mile in open areas) of communal roosts when eagles are congregating, without prior coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and your State wildlife agency.

 

6.      Locate aircraft corridors no closer than 1,000 feet vertical or horizontal distance from communal roost sites.

 

7.      Use pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals only in accordance with Federal and State laws and labeled instructions for their use.

 

8.      Identify and monitor contaminants associated with hazardous waste sites (legal or illegal), permitted releases, and runoff from agricultural areas, especially within watersheds where eagles have shown poor reproduction or where bioaccumulating contaminants have been documented.  These factors present a risk of contamination to eagles and their food sources.

 

9.      Where nests are blown from trees during storms or are otherwise destroyed by the elements, continue to protect the site in the absence of the nest for up to three (3) complete breeding seasons.  Many eagles will rebuild the nest and reoccupy the site.

 

10. Site wind turbines and high voltage transmission power lines away from bald eagle communal roost sites to avoid collisions, where feasible.  Bury utility lines along forested shorelines and roadways in new development projects.

 

11. Employ industry-accepted measures to prevent birds from being electrocuted on towers and poles.  

 

12. Where bald eagles are likely to nest in human-made structures (e.g. cell phone towers) and such use could impede operation or maintenance of the structures or jeopardize the safety of the eagles, equip the structures with either (1) devices engineered to discourage bald eagles from building nests, or (2) nesting platforms that will safely accommodate bald eagle nests without interfering with structure performance.  

 

13. Immediately cover carcasses of euthanized animals at landfills to protect eagles from being poisoned.

 

14. Do not intentionally feed bald eagles.  Artificially feeding bald eagles can disrupt their essential behavioral patterns and put them at increased risk from power lines, collision with windows and cars, and other mortality factors.

 

15. Avoid excessive groundwater pumping and river diversion that can lead to destruction of nest trees, roosts, and foraging areas.

 

16. Use an approved non-toxic shot when hunting migratory waterfowl, consistent with current hunting regulations.  Eagles can be poisoned by elevated levels of lead after feeding on fish and waterfowl that have ingested lead shot or carrion killed with lead shot.

 

What will happen to existing permits that cover “take” of bald eagles if the actions the Service is proposing are made final?

 

We anticipate that all existing permits would continue to be honored and in effect if the eagle is delisted and the proposed actions are made final.  We hope that during the comment period on this proposal, the public will specifically comment on issues associated with incidental take permits issued under Habitat Conservation Plans that include bald eagles as a covered species.

 

What has contributed to the recovery of the bald eagle in the lower 48 states?

 

The recovery of the bald eagle was a national effort.  Two important factors made the recovery of the bald eagle possible, the most critical being the Federal Government’s ban on the use of DDT  in the United States in 1972.  Second, the eagle is protected by the BGEPA, the MBTA and was placed on the list of threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act.  The ESA listing allowed us to protect habitat for the bald eagle, including nesting sites and summer and winter roost sites. States, private landowners and others played a vital role in restoring eagles, including purchasing and protecting important habitat, reintroducing the bald eagle back into the wild, and extensive public education efforts. 

 

Are total numbers the only criterion on which removal of the species from the list is based?

 

No. The decision to reclassify the bald eagle to threatened in 1995 and the decision to delist, if finalized, are based on numbers of breeding pairs, population trends, geographic distribution, reproductive success, habitat protection and an assessment of current threats and ability to manage them.

 

Did the Service have a recovery plan for the bald eagle?

 

Yes, the bald eagle population in the lower 48 states is divided into five recovery regions.  These regions are the Northern States, Chesapeake Bay, Southeastern, Southwestern and the Pacific Regions.  Five separate recovery plans were developed, one for each region.

 

Since the development and implementation of the recovery plans, the bald eagle’s population growth has exceeded most of the goals established in the various plans.  Population goals have been met and/or exceeded in the Chesapeake Bay, Northern, Pacific, and Southeastern Recovery Regions.  The Southwest recovery plan did not include population goals. 

 

How does the Service determine whether a species is recovered?

 

The criteria spelled out in the recovery plans are used as a yardstick to measure whether the species is no longer endangered or threatened.  But those factors are not the only criteria.  The ESA identifies five factors that the Service must consider to determine if delisting is appropriate:

 

1.  Threats to, or actual destruction of, the habitat needed by the species;

2.  Threats from the over-use of the species for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes;

3.  Threats from disease or predation;                                                                  

4.  The amount of protection provided to the species or its habitat by other laws and regulations; and

5.  Any other natural or manmade factors affecting the continued existence of the species.

 

The Service determines whether recovery has been achieved by reviewing the best available scientific information on whether the threats to the species have been reduced and the population levels have reached the goals established in its recovery plan. Achievement of the recovery plan=s criteria triggers the Service to formally re-evaluate the species in terms of these five factors.

 

A species is recovered when it is no longer in danger of extinction, or likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range, and the threats that led to the species= listing have been reduced or eliminated.  The bald eagle meets these requirements for removal from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife.

 

How will we know that the population will not start to decline without the protections of the Endangered Species Act?

 

As required by the Endangered Species Act, the Service will monitor the species in cooperation with the states for a minimum of five years after delisting in order to evaluate the population after the protections of the ESA are lifted.  If the population declines and the Service determines that the protections of the ESA are needed, the bald eagle can be relisted. 

The Service recently completed a pilot study in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey and several states to determine the best survey methodology for monitoring bald eagles after delisting.   The Service anticipates that a draft bald eagle monitoring plan will be available for public review 2006.

Will bald eagle habitat be protected once the bald eagle is no longer listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act?

 

Other federal laws that protect our land and water resources, including bald eagle habitat, will still apply.  These include the Clean Water Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and others.  Many National Wildlife Refuges and other federal lands are managed to protect habitat for the bald eagle as well.  In addition, many states, local governments and private interest groups have purchased and protected lands important as bald eagle habitat.  The Service will continue to promote the preservation of bald eagle habitat through all of these means.  Finally, while primarily crafted to prevent “take” of bald eagles, the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines will promote protection of important areas that bald eagles use for nesting, roosting, and foraging because of the many instances where degradation of such areas would likely cause bald eagles to be disturbed. 

 

Are there any remaining threats to the bald eagle?

 

Impacts from contaminants have been significantly reduced with the ban of DDT, elimination of lead shot for waterfowl hunting, and restrictions on other harmful pesticides.  Contaminants still do impact eagles on a more localized basis, but not to the extent that they are suppressing the overall population increase.  Overall, a predominance of factors leads us  to conclude that the bald eagle no longer meets the definition of threatened or endangered under the ESA, including: the number of current breeding pairs, the availability of nesting habitat, the extent to which such habitat is protected, and the adaptability of the species.  

 

What are the protections provided by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)?

Under the MBTA, it is illegal to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, possess, sell, barter, purchase, export, or import migratory birds, their parts, nests or eggs, except as permitted by regulation.  Take is defined under the MBTA as “pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, possess, or collect.”  The migratory bird species covered by the MBTA include bald eagles.

Where can I get more information on the bald eagle?

 

You may obtain more information on the bald eagle at our new bald eagle web site and related links at <http://migratorybirds.fws.gov/BaldEagle.htm>.

Return to Bald Eagle Page

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service   Contact Us     Privacy