ARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS IN PERIL: REPORT OF THE ARCTIC GOOSE HABITAT WORKING
GROUP
EXPECTED WHITE GOOSE POPULATION EVENTS
If current agricultural and goose management practices are maintained,
we expect continued growth of all populations for the foreseeable future,
except the Wrangel Island LSGO. The western Arctic and western Central
Flyway LSGO populations will escape from control by hunting (i.e., adult
survival will increase). Western Arctic spring staging areas and nesting
areas, which are predominantly fresh-water environments, should then
experience increasing degradation similar to that already documented in
these habitats in the Hudson Bay and central Canadian Arctic resulting in
a decrease in survival of flightless young and other condition-related
effects. More nesting colonies are likely to be established where suitable
habitat exists. However, Alisauskas and Boyd (1994) speculate that prime
nesting sites of Central Arctic Ross' and Snow Geese (shallow lakes with
islands preferred as colony sites) are now in short supply and these geese
must exploit other habitats. They appear to be spreading westward and
northward into favoured range of small Canada Geese and White-fronted
Geese. In southern Hudson Bay, most areas of extensive salt marsh capable
of sustaining large colonies are now occupied (K. Abraham, R. Jefferies
and A. Jano, unpublished data). Use of other habitats, particularly Carex aquatilis fens, is expected to increase.
Populations of all three white geese may experience an increase in the
frequency of disease outbreaks in wintering and migration areas, but the
mid-continent LSGO population, at least, appears to have the capacity to
absorb many such small events without the overall population growth being
slowed. Disease mortality effects on populations of other birds sharing
these areas may be more detrimental.