Subject
Oriented Session:
Sturgeon Passage/Hydropower Operation
Introduction:
The session began with self-introductions, along with
brief statements of job duties and how they relate to
fish passage or hydropower operations and licensing.
Topics Covered:
- Importance of fish passage to sturgeon rehabilitation
- Need for population specific data
Participant List:
Stephen Amaral, Mike Donofrio, Dave Bryson, Brant Fisher,
Mike Friday, Charles Hendry, Boyd Kynard, Joe Lyons,
Bruce McGregor, Tom Pratt, Jeremy Pyatskowit, Don Reiter,
Karen Schmidt, Larry Thompson (facilitator), Jerry Weise
Discussion Summary:
Importance of fish passage to sturgeon rehabilitation
1) the importance depends on the current status of
the sturgeon populations above and below the dam in
question;
2) the importance depends on the historical distribution
and abundance of sturgeon in the watershed, including
the area upstream of the dam;
3) the importance depends on the availability and suitability
of habitat for sturgeon upstream of the dam;
4) there are measures at dams other than fish passage
that could maintain or enhance conditions for sturgeon
downstream of the dam, such as providing adequate instream
flows, proper flow release timing, and improved channel
conditions.
5) dams fragment sturgeon populations, and providing
fish passage would re-connect the upstream and downstream
populations.
Need for population specific data
The group discussed the need to obtain relevant information
regarding the sturgeon populations in a watershed before
pursuing fish passage at a dam.
This information could allow prioritization of watersheds
and dam sites, where sturgeon passage would yield the
most benefit to sturgeon rehabilitation.
The point was made and reinforced that a basin-specific
fishery management plan should be developed for watersheds
that include dams where sturgeon passage is contemplated.
Such a plan should address the current sturgeon population
status, historical distribution and abundance, habitat
distribution and quality, and other issues.
The point was made that fish passage facilities at
a dam, or dam removal, could open a vast watershed area
to sea lampreys or other invasive species. The group
discussed the need for a basin-specific fishery management
plan to include recommendations to prevent the potential
invasion by sea lampreys or other invasive species past
the dam.
The issue was raised that sturgeon passage at a dam
may include cultural as well as biological justifications.
The potential for fish passageways to allow sturgeon
to pass to Native American Reservation lands was briefly
discussed.
Most of the issues discussed by our session participants
could, and should, be addressed in basin-specific fishery
management plans for each watershed where fish passage
at dams is under consideration. It is advisable for
the resource agencies to develop such plans. These plans
would prioritize sites for sturgeon passage, as well
as discuss the current sturgeon population status, the
historical distribution and abundance of sturgeon, the
distribution and quality of sturgeon habitat in the
watershed, measures to prevent non-native or nuisance
species invasions of the watershed, and other issues.
Back to Contents | Back
to Home