Connect With Us
Questions and Answers about the Proposal to Reintroduce Topeka Shiners in Missouri
Proposal published in the Federal Register on Jan. 23, 2013
1. What action is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service taking?
2. Why do the Topeka shiner reintroductions require designating “nonessential experimental populations?”
3. What is a nonessential experimental population?
A nonessential experimental population is a group of reintroduced plants or animals that is geographically isolated from other populations of the species and is not considered essential to the survival of the species as a whole.
4. What characteristics allow these reintroduced populations to be designated as nonessential experimental?
These reintroduced populations will be considered experimental because they will be reintroduced into suitable habitat that is outside of the Topeka shiner’s current range but within its historical range. They will be designated nonessential because the likelihood of the Topeka shiner surviving, as a species, would not be reduced if this reintroduction is not successful. Survival of the Topeka shiner, as a species, is reliant on maintenance and improvement of existing populations within its current range, rather than expansion of its range into unoccupied areas within Missouri. The nonessential experimental population status will protect these Topeka shiner populations as appropriate, while still allowing the presence of the fish to be compatible with routine activities in the reintroduction area. We believe the nonessential experimental designation will allow us to retain the full support of the public, which will be critical to the success of the project.
5. Specifically, what Endangered Species Act provisions will be relaxed within the nonessential experimental populations as a result of the 10(j) rule?
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act prohibits the “take” of endangered species, whether intentional or not. The term 'take' is defined in the Act to include “. . . . wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct." If this proposed rule is finalized, within the nonessential experimental populations “take” of Topeka shiners that is incidental to otherwise legal activities, such as farming, forestry and wildlife management, land development, recreation, and other activities, is allowed. Therefore, if a landowner conducts legal activities and Topeka shiners are killed, he or she is not violating the Endangered Species Act. The intentional “take” of Topeka shiners would violate the Endangered Species Act.
6. Will activities be prohibited because of the reintroduced populations?
No, while it would be illegal to deliberately “take” (kill or harm) Topeka shiners in the nonessential experimental populations, there are no additional prohibited activities because that would go against the purpose of the nonessential experimental population classification, which is specifically to avoid restricting land management and recreational activities. Federal projects would not be altered or stopped to protect the reintroduced Topeka shiner populations. No federal agency or its contractors will be in violation of the Endangered Species Act for harming or killing Topeka shiners as a result of authorized agency actions. Missouri’s sport fishing regulations would apply just like any other area of the state, with no new regulations to protect the reintroduced Topeka shiner populations, including no changes to bait collection regulations.
7. Where are the proposed nonessential experimental populations for the Topeka shiner in Missouri?
There are three proposed nonessential experimental population areas. They are located in the Big Muddy Creek, Little Creek and Spring Creek watersheds of Adair, Gentry, Harrison, Putnam, Sullivan, and Worth Counties. All the reintroduction sites within these areas will be on lands owned by the Missouri Department of Conservation or The Nature Conservancy. Maps that show the specific locations are attached to this fact sheet.
8. Do you expect the Topeka shiner to expand into waters on private lands?
Yes, for the reintroduction to be successful, Topeka shiners will survive, reproduce, and expand their distribution from the introduction areas. We do not expect them to expand beyond the nonessential experimental population areas.
9. If predatory game fish are a threat to Topeka shiners, does the USFWS or Missouri Department of Conservation expect that future management will include removing game fish from streams within the nonessential experimental populations?
No, predatory game fish (especially largemouth bass) are more of a threat on streams and rivers with large impoundments. The nonessential experimental population areas were partially selected because there are no large impoundments with significant sport fisheries in the headwaters and numbers of largemouth bass are not expected to be high enough to prevent success of the reintroduction. In addition, methods for removing bass and other game fish would also harm Topeka shiners and thus are not practical.
Game fish were removed from ponds that will be used for captive-rearing Topeka shiners. This is a management action that will not be taken outside of those ponds.
10. Why are Topeka shiners being reintroduced?
Although the Topeka shiner is stable in southwest Minnesota and South Dakota, viable populations in Missouri can be found in only two streams with populations that are small and isolated. The purpose of the reintroductions is to restore Topeka shiners in a manner that, if successful, would mean the species is no longer vulnerable to extirpation in Missouri. New stable Topeka shiner populations in Missouri, although not essential to the species’ recovery, will support recovery by providing resiliency and improved health for the species as a whole.
11. How will the reintroduction be monitored?
The Missouri Department of Conservation will monitor reintroduction efforts by periodically evaluating the status of Topeka shiner populations. To assess changes in distribution within each watershed, personnel will sample captive-rearing ponds and streams within the nonessential experimental population areas.
12. How do I comment on the proposal to establish Topeka shiner nonessential experimental populations in Missouri?
You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
By hard copy:
We will not accept comments by email or fax. The comment period closes on March 25, 2013.
Information on the proposal to designate three nonessential experimental populations for the Topeka shiner in Missouri can be found on our website at www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/. A copy of the proposed rule is also available online at http://www.regulations.gov.
The Missouri Department of Conservation’s Topeka Shiner Recovery Plan is available online at http://go.usa.gov/4rcJ.
You may also request information by calling or writing:
We will hold two public meetings to provide information about the proposal and to answer questions. The public meetings will be held:
Figure 2. Map of the proposed Topeka shiner nonessential experimental population area in Little Creek watershed, Harrison County.
Figure 3. Map of the proposed Topeka shiner nonessential experimental population area in Big Muddy Creek watershed, Gentry, Harrison, and Worth Counties.
Figure 4. Map of the proposed Topeka shiner nonessential experimental population area shiner in Spring Creek watershed, Adair, Putnam, and Sullivan Counties.
Last updated: January 23, 2013