|
Soft Engineering of Shorelines Based on a Binational Conference Sponsored by the Greater Detroit American Heritage River Initiative and Partners |
||||||||||||
|
Chapter 8 Restoring Habitat Using Soft Engineering Techniques at LaSalle Park, Hamilton Harbour, Burlington, Ontario, Canada (John Hall) Introduction This harbor project was aimed at enhancing fish and wildlife habitat, reducing turbidity, and encouraging passive recreational opportunities. This is more in keeping with improved water quality and closer to the park's previous relationship with Lake Ontario (Figure 26). Project Description The design included five restoration components:
The overall goal was to diversify the fish community
by encouraging native predators such as bass or pike. This has been carried
out with the creation of 11.9 ha of fish habitat, 1.4 km of rehabilitated
littoral edge, 145 m of emergent shoals, 2 rocky reefs of 950 square meters,
and over 125 fish habitat modules. A rock breakwater extends approximately 160 m into the harbor sheltering the marina basin and creating 11.9 ha of fish habitat. The west side of the promontory contains a wave-washed spawning reef and habitat for invertebrates, such as crayfish (Figure 27). The easterly lee is vegetated with overhanging native plants providing shade and protection. The fine gravel bottom provides protected spawning habitat for bass and sunfish. Tree stumps, logs, open concrete pipes, and poles are anchored into the promontory providing refuge and feeding habitats for fish. Five large shoals and a submerged reef provide more spawning habitat. |
||||||||||||
|
Figure 26. The sand beach at LaSalle Park prior to restoration.
|
Figure 27. The sand beach at LaSalle Park after restoration using soft engineering techniques.
|
|||||||||||
|
Restoration of the beach area involved the removal of many
tons of rock fill that had been added over the years. In its place is
a sandy pebble beach where frogs, turtles, and salamanders can travel
freely between the water and the natural wetland located at the base of
the forested bluff. The beach contains a small pond for frogs and salamanders
and a nesting mound for turtles. In low water conditions, some of the
rocks used to create fish habitat modules become visible. These provide
loafing areas for birds and turtles. In the basin where logs and brush
bundles have been anchored to the bottom, turtles, frogs, and shorebirds
use the branches and trunks for basking and loafing. The meandering shoreline creates a complex edge preferred
by fish and wildlife. The diverse vegetation attracts a greater variety
of insects, small animals, and birds. The wetland, shrubs, and trees along
the water's edge provide a connection with the forested slope. Over time,
the natural forest edge should creep down to join the wetland and form
a corridor for mammals and birds along the edge of the bay. A waterfront trail, complemented with interpretive signs, allows visitors in LaSalle park to view and understand the fish and wildlife restoration carried out at the site. East of the pier, the trail passes a recreational marina on its way to a boardwalk crossing the restored beach. This boardwalk, constructed at the back of the beach through the edge of a wetland, provides clearance to accommodate the movement of amphibians. Further east along the shoreline, the trail contains several lookouts and seating areas which have become an excellent area for viewing flocks of migrating, nesting, and feeding waterfowl (Figure 28). Over time, as the trees and shrubs planted along the shoreline mature, the trail will become more complex, coursing between woodlands and lookouts.
|
||||||||||||
|
Figure 28. The improved habitat and plant diversity is easily viewed from the boardwalk. The boardwalk provides improved public access.
|
||||||||||||
|
Regulatory Considerations Regulatory considerations included:
Cost |
||||||||||||
| Engineering and design |
$ 219,000 |
|||||||||||
| Construction of islands/landscaping/public access |
$2,320,000 |
|||||||||||
|
Total
|
$2,539,000
|
|||||||||||
|
LaSalle Park is responding to restoration efforts. There is an increase in abundance of aquatic plants and greater diversity in fish and wildlife (Figure 28). Benefits of the Project Benefits included:
Advice for Overcoming Obstacles When Using Soft
Engineering Practices The proponents felt that the best thing this project did, once a concept for rehabilitation was developed, was to form a project advisory group of stakeholders. This group was a combination of local interest groups, science community, and relevant agencies. The group worked through the detailed design and environmental assessment stages. Since these groups had been involved from the design stage, permits/funding approvals were easier to obtain. Funding and Implementation Partners Bay Area Restoration Council (representing citizens,
interest groups, municipalities, industries, and landowners);
Contact Persons The Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project
Vic Cairns |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||




