Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge
Midwest Region

Best Management Practices for
Soft Engineering

of Shorelines
Based on a Binational Conference Sponsored by the
Greater Detroit American Heritage River Initiative and Partners

Summary and Overview

The Problem of Single Purpose Shoreline Development

Historically, many river shorelines were stabilized and hardened with concrete and steel to protect developments from flooding and erosion, or to accommodate commercial navigation or industry. Typically shorelines were developed for a single purpose. Today, there is growing support for development of shorelines for multiple purposes so that additional benefits can be accrued.

Up and down our Detroit River, efforts are underway to reshape the riverfront from being concealed in our backyard to becoming the focal point of our attention. General Motors is switching the front door of the Renaissance Center from Jefferson Avenue to the Detroit River with the building of a five-story Wintergarden (Figure 1). The Promenade stretching east from the Renaissance Center will further showcase our river for businesses and residents. In Windsor, another three miles of continuous riverfront greenway were opened in 1999 to promote our river and help create an exciting venue for people to work, play, and socialize downtown. In Wyandotte, the building of a golf course, rowing club, and greenways have directed attention to our river and have resulted in considerable spin-off benefits. People want to increase access to our river, incorporate trails and walkways to it, improve the aesthetic appearance of the shoreline, and reap recreational, ecological, and economic benefits from it. Our Detroit River has been rediscovered as an incredible asset and a key ingredient in achieving quality of life.

Our Detroit River has been rediscovered as an incredible asset and a key ingredient in achieving quality of life.

Figure 1. General Motors Corporation's Wintergarden at the Renaissance Center facing the Detroit River (rendering courtesy of Hines Development and Skidmore Owings & Merrill, LLP Master Architects).

Center drawing

Hard vs. Soft Engineering of Shorelines

On November 23, 1999, the Greater Detroit American Heritage River Initiative held its first major stakeholder event to look at options on how to reshape the Detroit River shoreline using techniques of soft engineering. Hard engineering of shorelines is generally defined as the use of concrete breakwalls or steel sheet piling to stabilize shorelines and achieve safety. There are many places along our working river where hard engineering is required for navigational or industrial purposes. Much of the Detroit River shoreline is already hardened. However, there is growing interest in using soft engineering of shorelines in appropriate locations. Soft engineering is the use of ecological principles and practices to reduce erosion and achieve the stabilization and safety of shorelines, while enhancing habitat, improving aesthetics, and saving money. Soft engineering is achieved by using vegetation and other materials to soften the land-water interface, thereby improving ecological features without compromising the engineered integrity of the shoreline.

Rationale for Soft Engineering

Hard engineering typically has no habitat value for fish or wildlife. Soft engineering incorporates habitat for fish and wildlife. The Detroit River is one of the most biologically diverse areas in the Great Lakes Basin. In 1998, the U.S.-Canada State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference (SOLEC) identified the Detroit River-Lake St. Clair ecosystem as one of 20 Biodiversity Investment Areas in the entire Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem with exceptional diversity of plants, fish, and birds, and the requisite habitats to support them (Reid et al. 1999). The State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference went on to call for special efforts to protect these unique ecological features. Many people who appreciate the outdoors know that the Detroit River supports a nationally renowned sport fishery. For example, the City of Trenton, located on the Trenton Channel at the lower end of the Detroit River, hosted a major walleye fishing tournament called "Walleye Week" in 1999. "Walleye Week" attracted people from all over North America to compete in the In-Fisherman Professional Walleye Tournament, the Team Walleye Tournament, and the Michigan Walleye Tournament offering $240,000 in prize money. It is estimated that walleye fishing alone brings in $1,000,000 to the economy of communities along the lower Detroit River each spring.

Another reason why soft engineering practices should be encouraged is because it is well recognized that there is limited public access to the Detroit River, particularly on the United States side. Use of multiple-objective soft engineering of shorelines will increase public access to the river.

There are also economic benefits associated with use of soft engineering. In general, soft engineering of shorelines is typically less expensive than hard engineering of shorelines. Additionally, long-term maintenance costs of soft engineering are generally lower because soft engineering uses living structures, which tend to mature and stabilize with time.

Technology Transfer

Over 200 people attended the November 23rd conference to:

  • learn from case studies of soft engineering of shorelines from places like Toronto, Hamilton Harbour, and Thunder Bay, Ontario, the Upper Mississippi River in Minnesota, and the Kenai River in Alaska;
  • hear about recent work on cost-benefit analysis of soft vs. hard engineering of shorelines; and
  • discuss where and how soft engineering might be used along the Detroit River (see Appendix A for the program and Appendix B for a list of participants).

The soft engineering case studies presented at the conference and additional ones contributed for this best management practices manual are listed in Table 1.

Participants in the November 23rd soft engineering conference learned that it is important to redevelop and redesign our shorelines for multiple objectives. Shorelines can be stabilized and achieve safety, while increasing public access, enhancing habitat, improving aesthetics, and saving money. Hard engineering of shorelines, in the form of steel sheet piling, can cost as much as $1,000 per linear foot. We cannot afford to use hard engineering along the entire length of the Detroit River shoreline, nor do we want fully hard engineered shorelines because they have no habitat value and will not support the diversity of fish and wildlife found in our river. Participants also learned that hard and soft engineering are not mutually exclusive, there are places where attributes of hard and soft engineering can be used together. This makes sense in a high-flow river like the Detroit River through which the entire upper Great Lakes pass.

It is critically important that the right people get involved upfront in redevelopment projects to be able to incorporate principles of soft engineering into future waterfront designs. The design process must identify opportunities and establish partnerships early in the process which achieve integrated ecological, economic, and societal objectives.

Soft engineering is the use of ecological principles and practices to reduce erosion and achieve the stabilization and safety of shorelines, while enhancing habitat, improving aesthetics, and saving money.
Hard engineering typically has no habitat value for fish or wildlife. Soft engineering incorporates habitat for fish and wildlife.
It is critically important that the right people get involved upfront in redevelopment projects to be able to incorporate principles of soft engineering into future waterfront designs.

 

Table 1. A list of soft engineering case studies presented.

Chapter
Soft Engineering Case Study
1
Recommendations from the incidental habitat workshop
2
Multiple objective soil bioengineering riverbank restoration
3
Comparison of soil bioengineering and hard structures for shore erosion control: cost and effectiveness
4
McDonald Park wetland and prairie restoration project
5
Constructing islands for habitat rehabilitation in the Upper Mississippi River
6
Goose Bay shoreline stabilization and habitat enhancement
7
Fish and wildlife habitat and shoreline treatments along the Toronto Waterfronts
8
Restoring habitat using soft engineering techniques at LaSalle Park
9
Enhancing habitat using soft engineering techniques at the northeastern shoreline of Hamilton Harbour
10
Bioengineering for erosion control and environmental improvements, Carson River, Nevada
11
Ford Field Park streambank stabilization project
12
Soil bioengineering for streambank protection and fish habitat enhancement
13
Achieving integrated habitat enhancement objectives, Lake Superior
14
Battle Creek River, bringing back the banks

Integrated Approach to Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Effectiveness

Figure 2 presents one potential design and implementation framework which encourages incorporating soft engineering practices into shoreline developments. As noted above, it is critically important that the right people get involved upfront in shoreline redevelopment projects to be able to incorporate principles of soft engineering into future waterfront designs. However, project leaders must first perform a preliminary assessment which:

  • defines the geographic extent of the project or study area;
  • inventories existing shoreline uses (habitat, public access, etc.); and
  • evaluates existing uses against historical conditions and desired future uses.


Figure 2. A framework to help incorporate soft engineering practices into shoreline developments.

flow chart graphic

A multidisciplinary team should be formed to reach agreement on goals and multiple objectives for the waterfront and its shoreline.


next page

 

Table of Contents

Last updated: July 9, 2008