PDF of Federal Register Notice October 4, 2007
Federal Register Notice:
Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Reviews of Two Plant Species and Two Wildlife Species in the Midwest Region
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of review; request for information.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), initiate 5-
year reviews of Houghton goldenrod
(Solidago houghtonii), dwarf lake iris
(Iris lacustris), scaleshell mussel
(Leptodea leptodon), and Niangua darter
(Etheostoma nianguae) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We request any new
information on these species that may
have a bearing on their classification as
endangered or threatened. Based on the
results of these reviews, we will make
a finding on whether these species are
properly classified under the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct these reviews, we must receive
your information no later than
December 3, 2007. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to
submit information and review the
information that we receive on these
species, see ‘‘Public Solicitation of New
Information.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
species-specific information, contact the
appropriate person under ‘‘Public
Solicitation of New Information.’’
Individuals who are hearing impaired
or speech impaired may call the Federal
Relay Service at (800) 877–8337 for TTY
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year Review?
Under the Act we maintain the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plant Species (List) at 50 CFR 17.11
and 17.12. We amend the List by
publishing final rules in the Federal
Register. Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires that we conduct a review of
listed species at least once every 5 years.
Section 4(c)(2)(B) requires that we
determine (1) whether a species no
longer meets the definition of
threatened or endangered and should be
removed from the List (delisted); (2)
whether a species more properly meets
the definition of threatened and should
be reclassified from endangered to
threatened; or (3) whether a species
more properly meets the definition of
endangered and should be reclassified
from threatened to endangered. Using
the best scientific and commercial data
available, we will consider a species for
delisting if the data substantiate that the
species is neither endangered nor
threatened for one or more of the
following reasons: (1) The species is
considered extinct; (2) the species is
considered to be recovered; and/or (3)
the original data available when we
listed the species, or interpretation of
such data, were in error. Any change in
Federal classification requires a separate
rulemaking process. Therefore, we are
requesting submission of any new
information (best scientific and
commercial data) on these species since
they were originally listed.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing those
species currently under active review.
This notice announces our active review
of the species in Table 1.
| TABLE 1. LISTING INFORMATION SUMMARY FOR FOUR SPECIES IN THE MIDWEST REGION |
| Common name |
Scientific name |
Status |
Historic range |
Final rule |
| Dwarf lake iris |
Iris lacustris |
Threatened |
U.S.A. (MI, WI), Canada
(Ont.).
|
Sept. 28, 1988 (53 FR
37972). |
| Houghton’s goldenrod |
Solidago houghtonii |
Threatened |
U.S.A. (MI), Canada (Ont.) |
July 18, 1988 (53 FR
27134). |
| Niangua darter |
Etheostoma nianguae |
Threatened |
U.S.A. (MO) |
June 12, 1985 (50 FR
24649). |
| Scaleshell mussel |
Leptodea leptodon |
Endangered |
U.S.A. (AL, AR, IA, IL, IN,
KY, MN, MO, OH, OK,
SD, TN, WI).
|
Oct. 9, 2001 (66 FR
51322) |
What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?
In our 5-year review, we consider all
new information available at the time of
the review. These reviews will consider
the best scientific and commercial data
that have become available since the
original listing determination or most
recent status review of each species,
such as—(A) Species biology, including
but not limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics; (B) Habitat conditions,
including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability; (C)
Conservation measures that have been
implemented to benefit the species; (D)
Threat status and trends (see five factors
under heading ‘‘How do we determine
whether a species is endangered or
threatened?’’); and (E) Other new
information, data, or corrections,
including but not limited to taxonomic
or nomenclatural changes, identification
of erroneous information contained in
the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants, and improved
analytical methods.
Public Solicitation of New Information
We request any new information
concerning the status of the plant
species Houghton’s goldenrod and
dwarf lake iris, and of the wildlife
species Niangua darter and scaleshell
mussel. See ‘‘What Information Do We
Consider in Our Review?’’ for specific
criteria. If you submit information,
support it with documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data,
and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources. We specifically
request information regarding data from
any systematic surveys, as well as any
studies or analysis of data that may
show population size or trends;
information pertaining to the biology or
ecology of the species; information
regarding the effects of current land
management on population distribution
and abundance; information on the
current condition of habitat; and recent
information regarding conservation
measures that have been implemented
to benefit the species. Additionally, we specifically request information on the current distribution of populations and
evaluation of threats faced by the
species in relation to the five listing
factors (as defined in section 4(a)(1) of
the Act) and the species’ listed status as
judged against the definition of
threatened or endangered. Finally, we
solicit recommendations pertaining to
the development of, or potential updates
to, recovery plans and additional
actions or studies that would benefit
these species in the future.
Our practice is to make information,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Before including your address,
telephone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information
in your response, you should be aware
that your entire submission—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
response to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Mail or hand-deliver information on
the following species to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Field Supervisor,
at the corresponding addresses below.
You may also view information we
receive in response to this notice, as
well as other documentation in our files,
at the following locations by
appointment, during regular business
hours.
Houghton’s goldenrod: 2651 Coolidge
Road, Suite 101, East Lansing, MI
48823–6316, Attention: Houghton’s goldenrod 5-Year Review. For speciesspecific
information, contact Ms. Tameka Dandridge at 517–351–8315.
Dwarf lake iris: 2651 Coolidge Road,
Suite 101, East Lansing, MI 48823–6316,
Attention: Dwarf lake iris 5-Year
Review. For species-specific
information, contact Ms. Barbara Hosler
at 517–351–6326.
Niangua darter: 101 Park DeVille
Drive, Suite A, Columbia, MO 65203–
0007, Attention: Niangua darter 5-Year
Review. For species-specific
information, contact Mr. Rick Hansen at
573–234–2132, extension 106.
Scaleshell mussel: 101 Park DeVille
Drive, Suite A, Columbia, MO 65203–
0007, Attention: Scaleshell mussel 5-
Year Review. For species-specific
information, contact Mr. Andy Roberts
at 573–234–2132, extension 110.
Electronic information must be
submitted in Text format or Rich Text
format to FW3_FY07MidwestRegion5
YearReview@fws.gov. Please send
information for each species in a
separate e-mail. Include the following
identifier in the subject line of the email:
Information on the 5-year review
for (add name of species—for example,
‘‘ * * * for scaleshell mussel’’), and
include your name and return address
in the body of your message.
How Are These Species Currently Listed?
Table 1 provides current listing
information for the species under active
review in this notice. Also, the List,
which covers all listed species, is
available on our Internet site at http://
endangered.fws.gov/
wildlife.html#Species.
Definitions
To help you submit information about
the species we are reviewing, we
provide the following definitions:
Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, which
interbreeds when mature;
Endangered species means any
species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range; and
Threatened species means any species
that is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
How Do We Determine Whether a
Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act establishes that we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors: (A)
The present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D)
The inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) Other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence. Section 4(a)(1) of the Act
requires that our determination be made
on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.
What Could Happen as a Result of Our
Review?
For each species under review, if we
find new information that indicates a
change in classification may be
warranted, we may propose a new rule
that could do one of the following: (a)
Reclassify the species from threatened
to endangered (uplist); (b) reclassify the
species from endangered to threatened
(downlist); or (c) remove the species
from the List (delist).
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species will remain on the List under its
current status.
Authority
We publish this document under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: September 4, 2007.
Wendi Weber, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3.
[FR Doc. E7–19603 Filed 10–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Back |