| PDF
Version
1) What
action is the Fish and Wildlife Service taking?
The Fish and Wildlife Service is designating 836 miles of stream in
the States of Iowa, Minnesota, and Nebraska as critical habitat for
the Topeka shiner, an endangered species protected under the Federal
Endangered Species Act.
Excluded
from the designation is all previously proposed critical habitat in
the States of Kansas, Missouri, and South Dakota as well as habitat
on the Fort Riley Military Installation in Kansas.
2) What
is the Topeka shiner?
This small, silvery minnow is 3 inches or less in length. It is found
in small to mid-size prairie streams with relatively high water quality
and cool-to-moderate temperatures. If this fish is to survive and flourish,
the form and structure of the streams where it lives must be safeguarded,
so that the habitat and the balance of fish species in these streams
is not significantly altered. While the Topeka shiner can sometimes
live in streams with degraded habitat conditions, its long-term survival
in these streams is at risk. The Topeka shiner was listed as endangered
on Dec. 15, 1998.
3) Why
is the Service designating critical habitat for the Topeka shiner?
In an April 4, 2001 court settlement, the Service agreed to designate
critical habitat for the Topeka shiner by Aug, 13, 2003. Due to budget
constraints, the Service petitioned the court for an extension of the
deadline until July 17, 2004.
4) What
is critical habitat?
Critical habitat designates areas that contain habitat essential
for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and which
may require special management considerations. A designation does not
set up a preserve or refuge and has no specific regulatory impact on
landowners'actions on their land that do not involve federal agency
funds, authorization or permits.
5) Which
areas are designated as critical habitat for the Topeka shiner?
The critical habitat designation includes:
Iowa:
Raccoon
River Watershed
|
County |
Stream
segments |
|
| Calhoun |
8 |
68 |
| Carroll |
2 |
7 |
| Dallas |
3 |
3 |
| Greene |
8 |
87 |
| Sac |
4 |
12 |
| Webster |
1 |
9 |
Boone
River Watershed:
| County |
Stream
segments |
Total
stream miles |
| Hamilton |
1 |
1 |
| Wright |
3 |
16 |
Rock
River Watershed:
| County |
Stream
segments |
Total
stream miles |
| Lyon |
3 |
16 |
| Osceola |
1 |
5 |
Minnesota:
Big Sioux
River Watershed:
| County |
Stream
segments |
Total
stream miles |
| Lincoln |
4 |
27 |
| Pipestone |
13 |
106 |
| Rock |
11 |
101 |
Rock
River:
| County |
Stream
segments |
Total
stream miles |
| Murray |
2 |
19 |
| Nobles |
14 |
115 |
| Pipestone |
8 |
90 |
| Rock |
16 |
146 |
Nebraska:
Elkhorn
River Watershed:
| County |
Stream
segments |
Total
stream miles |
| Madison |
1 |
6 |
6) Which
areas are excluded from the critical habitat designation?
All previously proposed lands in the states of Kansas, Missouri, and
South Dakota and on the Fort Riley Military Installation in Kansas are
excluded from the designation.
7) Why
are these lands excluded?
Lands in the States of Missouri, Kansas, and South Dakota were excluded
from critical habitat designation because those states have management
plans that provide comprehensive conservation measures and programs
necessary to achieve recovery of the Topeka shiner. These state management
plans satisfied the following three criteria: (1) they provide a conservation
benefit to the species (i.e., the plans must maintain or provide for
an increase in the species population or enhancement or restoration
of its habitat within the area covered by the plan); (2) they provide
assurances that they will be or will continue to be implemented; and
(3) they provide assurances that they will be effective (i.e., the plans
must identify biological goals, have provisions for reporting progress,
and are of a duration sufficient to implement the actions and achieve
the goals and objectives).
The Fort
Riley Military Installation in Kansas was excluded because it has an
integrated natural resource management plan that provides adequate management
and conservation benefit for the shiner.
In addition,
the Endangered Species Act requires the Service take into consideration
the economic impact, impacts to national security, and any other relevant
impact, of specifying any particular area as critical habitat. Based
on these considerations, areas can be excluded from critical habitat
designation when the benefits of exclusion outweigh the benefits of
inclusion, provided the exclusion will not result in the extinction
of the species.
8) How
did the Service determine what should be designated as critical habitat
for the Topeka shiner?
The best scientific data available was used to determine areas that
contain the physical and biological features essential for the conservation
of the Topeka shiner. In designating critical habitat, the Service reviewed
the conservation of the species undertaken by local, State and Federal
agencies, Tribal governments, and private individuals and organizations
since the species was listed in 1998. The Service reviewed available
information concerning Topeka shiner habitat use and preferences, habitat
conditions, threats, limiting factors, population demographics, and
the known location, distribution, and abundance of Topeka shiners.
9) Are
there areas being designated as critical habitat where Topeka shiner
are not currently known to occur?
No. All areas designated as critical habitat for the Topeka shiner are
considered occupied by the species or are short stream segments that
provide critical links between occupied habitats.
10)
How does critical habitat affect private landowners?
A critical habitat designation has no specific regulatory impact on
private landowners who take actions on their land that do not involve
Federal funding or require a Federal permit. Activities normally conducted
by a landowner or operator of a business not involving Federal funding,
permitting, or authorization in order to occur would not be affected.
It is important,
however, to remember that because the Topeka shiner is a listed species,
private landowners may not harm or otherwise take Topeka shiners unless
they have an incidental take permit issued by the Service. This obligation
results from the listing of the Topeka shiner as an endangered species,
not the critical habitat designation.
11)
Would a critical habitat designation affect swimming, boating and fishing?
In most cases, a critical habitat designation will not impact swimming,
boating or fishing. In rare instances, where Federal funding, authorization
or permits are required - such as construction of a new boating facility
- consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service may be necessary.
Most of these types of projects already are being reviewed under the
section 7 interagency consultation requirements of the Endangered Species
Act.
12)
Who would be affected by a critical habitat designation?
Federal agencies are required to consult with the Service on actions
they carry out, fund, or authorize that might affect critical habitat.
It is important to note that in most cases, this is already occurring
under the section 7 interagency consultation requirements of the Endangered
Species Act. Non-Federal entities, including private landowners, that
may also be affected could include, for example, those seeking a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit under the Clean Water Act to build
an in-water structure, those seeking Federal approval to discharge effluent
into the aquatic environment, or those seeking Federal funding to implement
land management practices where such actions affect the aquatic environment
that has been designated as critical habitat. But again, in most cases
where this link exists between activities on private lands and Federal
funding, permitting, or authorization, consultation under section 7
of the Endangered Species Act is already occurring.
13)
What effect does the critical habitat designation for Topeka shiner
have on National Fire Plan interagency coordination?
It prompts Federal agencies to consider the effects of proposed actions
on critical habitat. Each Federal agency must confer with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service on any action that
may affect listed species or designated critical habitat. This includes
any actions proposed under the National Fire Plan. Consultation can
take the form of informal discussions during which the Service may suggest
modifications to the action to avoid or minimize impacts to critical
habitat. If the Federal agency determines that the proposed action is
not likely to adversely affect designated critical habitat and the Service
concurs with this determination, consultation can be concluded informally.
If the proposed action is likely to adversely affect critical habitat,
formal consultation is required.
14)
Will this critical habitat designation affect water rights or usage?
It will not affect water rights. In cases where irrigation is provided
through a Federal agency, such as the Bureau of Reclamation, that agency
would have to consult with the Service to determine whether water withdrawals
would adversely impact Topeka shiner critical habitat. However, it is
important to note that most of these types of projects already are being
reviewed under the section 7 interagency consultation requirements of
the Endangered Species Act.
15)
Will this critical habitat designation impact the use of land adjacent
to the designated waterways?
Possibly. If the adjacent land is Federal land or the land is private
but has a Federal nexus involving funding or permits, the proposed land
use activity would be assessed for its potential impacts on Topeka shiner
critical habitat in the aquatic environment through consultation with
the Federal agency. Most of these types of projects already are being
reviewed under the section 7 interagency consultation requirements of
the Endangered Species Act.
16)
How long does a critical habitat designation remain in effect?
A critical habitat designation remains in effect until the species is
considered recovered and is removed from the Endangered Species list.
Prior to recovery, if new information indicates that changes should
be made in the designation, this may be done through the formal rule-making
process.
17)
Where can I get more information on the Topeka Shiner and critical habitat?
For general information on Topeka shiners and the designation of critical
habitat contact
Vernon Tabor at the Kansas Ecological Services Field Office, at the
above address; telephone 785/539-3474; facsimile 785/539-8567.
For local
information on Topeka shiners in your state, contact one of the Service
field offices below:
Columbia,
Missouri Ecological Services Field Office
101 Park Deville Dr., Suite A
Columbia, MO 65203
tel: 573/234-2132
Rock Island,
Illinois Ecological Services Field Office (for Iowa information)
4469 48th Avenue Court
Rock Island, IL 61201
tel: 309/793-5800
Phil Delphey
Twin Cities, Minnesota Ecological Services Field Office
4101 East 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55425
tel: 612/725-3548 ext. 206
To
Top
Back
Home |