Table 5. Changes in harvest levels and whether they were significant or non-significant (a) for all years for which harvest data is available for each State and (b) for 1990-2000. Statistical significance was determined via regression analysis; P=0.20 (P-values shown in parentheses).
State
Harvest for all years
Harvest 1990-2000
Alabama
Non-significant (0.30)
Significant decrease (0.051)
Arkansas
Significant decrease (0.089)
Significant decrease (0.010)
Georgia
Significant decrease (0.087)
Non-significant (0.23)
Illinois
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.001)
Indiana
Significant decrease (0.007)
Significant decrease (0.086)
Iowa
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.001)
Kentucky
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.028)[1994-2000 only]
Maryland
Significant increase (0.032)
Non-significant (0.60)
Minnesota
Missing data
Non-significant (0.96)
Missouri
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.092)
New York
Non-significant (0.54)
Significant decrease (0.106)
North Carolina
Significant increase (0.000)
Non-significant (0.65)
Ohio
Non-significant (0.25)
Significant decrease (0.020)
Pennsylvania
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.085)
Tennessee
Missing data
Significant decrease (0.023)
Vermont
Non-significant (0.72)
Significant decrease (0.000)
Virginia
Significant decrease (0.004)
Significant decrease (0.005)
West Virginia
Significant decrease (0.03)
Significant decrease (0.004)
Wisconsin
Significant decrease (0.113)
Significant decrease (0.001)
Last Updated: August 22, 2006
International Affairs main page | Contact International Affairs | USFWS home page | Privacy | Disclaimer | FOIA | Department of the Interior |First Gov