|
|
Invasive Spartina in Humboldt County Curious about what methods the refuge is taking to control Spartina? This brochure (650K pdf) has the answers! Introduction Introduction Invasive Spartina around the World Invasive Spartina Impacts Worldwide
Large-scale efforts to control invasive Spartina are in their final stages in San Francisco Bay, California, and Willapa Bay in Washington. These efforts have primarily targeted smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora), a much larger species than S. densiflora that colonizes intertidal mudflats. However, in S.F. Bay hybrids between smooth cordgrass and the native Spartina foliosa (not present in Humboldt Bay) have complicated matters due to the difficulty of detecting all hybrids. S. densiflora is also present at San Francisco Bay and has hybridized with native S. foliosa as well. However, the area infested with S.densiflora there is much smaller than at Humboldt Bay. Managers at these other estuaries have employed a mixture of mechanical and chemical control methods, including mowing, covering, and spraying with herbicides. Biological control using a planthopper (Prokeleisa marginata) has been used in Washington on Spartina alterniflora.
Distribution of Spartina in Humboldt Bay, Eel River, and Mad River estuaries The first comprehensive inventory of Spartina densiflora in Humboldt Bay was conducted in 1998, when staff at Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge (HBNWR) mapped stands of Spartina in two abundance classes over aerial photos in the field. This detailed mapping project (Pickart 2001 5.5MB pdf) revealed that almost 20 years ago, Spartina was present Between 2008 and 2010 refuge staff completed an updated inventory of all Spartina within its boundaries (Grazul and Rowland 2010) (3.26MB pdf). Spartina was present in 97% of unrestored salt marsh, but only 22% of brackish marsh. Much of the brackish marsh on the refuge is behind dikes, which limits tidal dispersal of seed to overtopping tides or failing tidegates. Mapping was expanded to all three estuaries (Humboldt Bay, Mad River, Eel River) in 2011 using more generalized cover classes and relying more on photointerpretation (Grazul and Rowland 2011). The total infestation was 1,671 ac 9including 35 acres of restored marsh with less than 1% cover remaining, and 185 ac of marsh currently undergoing restoration). Approximately 60% of the infestation is in Humboldt Bay and 40% in the Eel River estuary. The Mad River estuary doesn’t have the extensive tidal lands that characterize Eel River and Humboldt Bay, and currently has less than 8 acres. Based on these mapping efforts, the total area infested by Spartina densiflora in Humboldt Bay increased from 820 acres in 1999 to 1,033 acres in 2011 (not taking into account the restored areas) an increase of 26%. Clearly the invasion is still in progress. Spartina seedbank dynamics in Humboldt Bay Two years of research on seedbank dynamics have been completed by staff at Humboldt Bay NWR. Results to date demonstrate that Spartina densiflora has a large seedbank that persists for at least one year, with an undetermined amount persisting a second year (results are currently being analyzed). The seedbank is much greater in areas of dense Spartina cover (lower elevation marshes) Sampling of the low marsh yielded a first year bank of viable seeds equal to over 6 million seeds/acre (Pickart 2012) Research is now in progress to determine what proportion of the sedling flush that occurs after a mowing treatment (see below) originates from the seedbank as opposed to seed rain. Spartina alterniflora in Humboldt Bay
The species composition of salt marshes is strongly controlled by the influence of tides. Salt marsh vegetation can only become established at or above the Mean Lower High Water (the average of the lower of two daily high tides). Low marsh is overwhelmingly influenced by the duration of salt water inundation. Both salinity and lack of oxygen during submersion limit plant life to only the most stress tolerant of species. In Humboldt Bay, salt marshes were classified by Eicher (1987) (37MB pdf): into three types based on their elevation, with corresponding differences in vegetation. The lowest elevation marshes, are dominated by pickleweed (Sarcocornia pacifica, formerly known as Salicornia virginica). At these elevations (<6.9 ft. MLLW), pickleweed forms homogeneous stands known as Pickleweed Marsh. In our native salt marshes, pickleweed, a hardy colonizer, is the first plant to establish in a newly forming marsh. Although Eicher's 1987 (2.97MB pdf) study characterized middle Our high elevation marshes (>7.3 ft. MLLW) are known as Mixed Marsh and contain the greatest diversity of species (over 20 species). These include pickleweed, salt grass (Distichlis spicata), jaumea (Jaumea carnosa), marsh rosemary (Limonium californica), and arrow-grass (Triglochin maritima), as well as two rare salt marsh annuals, Humboldt Bay owl’s clover (Castilleja ambigua ssp. humboldtiensis) and Pt. Reyes bird’s beak (Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. palustris). Although Spartina is less vigorous on these high elevation marshes, it was found to be increasing dramatically on one high marsh (from <5% to >40% frequency from 1989 to 1997, Pickart 2001). In Humboldt Bay, saltmarshes occur both as islands and adjacent to the mainland. Island marshes have no freshwater input other than rainfall, so salinity is high and limiting. Mainland marshes often receive freshwater runoff that can dilute salinities, resulting jn brackish marshes at the upper edge of salt marshes. Brackish marshes around our bay are characterized by a diverse group of species including Lyngbye’s sedge (Carex lyngbyei), hardstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus acutus), salt rush (Juncus lesueurii), sea watch angelica (Angelica lucida), narrow-leaved bur-reed (Sparganium angustifolium) and others. Spartina densiflora appears to flourish in our brackish marshes, as it does in its native range and in other countries where it has invaded.
Invasive Spartina Impacts in Humboldt County Outcompetes indigenous plant species Alters invertebrate assemblages Alters estuarine productivity (add photo algae) Source for cordgrass invasions of other areas Spartina densiflora control and salt marsh restoration in Humboldt Bay Following this success, a 25-acre mainland salt marsh was restored, with combined funding from the Conservancy and the FWS, beginning in Fall 2006. Metal-bladed brushcutters were substituted for weedwhips, and a methodology evolved that eventually consisted of cutting above ground biomass into small enough pieces to avoid forming dense floating wrack and “grinding” the shallow rhizomes. Depending on how deeply the treatment is applied, mortality can be achieved in one or a few visits. However, in the first year following treatment, seedling flushes may occurr on resulting bare areas on the mainland marsh where freshwater input is abundant, necessitating follow-up treatments using flaming or brushcutting. Seedlings could be emerging both from the persistent seedbank or by seeds newly dispersed from nearby areas. The latter possibility emphasizes the need for a regional approach to eradication, in which seed production is entirely halted. Research has confirmed that a persistent seedbank is present, and a new study will look at the longevity of this seedbank over the next two years. The pilot restoration begun in 2006 resulted in a highly functioning salt marsh with increased diversity of algae, vascular plants, and invertebrates. Revegetation was explored, but determined to be unnecessary at the scale involved. Native marsh vegetation has achieved full recovery, although removal of newly established seedlings will be required until regional eradication cuts off seeds sources (Pickart 2008 1MB pdf Pickart 2012) Restoration resulted in the dramatic recovery of two rare salt marsh plants, Humboldt Bay owl's clover (Castilleja ambigua ssp. humboldtiensis) and Point Reyes' birds-beak (Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. palustris) Both are hemiparasites, and grow on high marsh and/or at the brackish interface of salt marsh and dunes. The brackish marshes had been highly invaded by Spartina, which is much taller and blocks more light thean the native hosts of these rare species. Following Spartina removal, the population of Humboldt Bay owl's clover increased from a mean of 1,657 (1989-2001) to 55,257 (2007-2011).
Following the success of the pilot projects, in 2010 HBNWR was awarded a $1 million competitive allocation to carry out removal of all existing Spartina within refuge boundaries. The refuge developed partnerships with the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, and Conservation District, the California Conservation Corps, CalFire, the Northcoast Resource Center, Friends of the Dunes, and others to carry out this challenge. Beginning in July 2010, crews were deployed throughout the refuge over a total of approximately 300 acres of salt and brackish marsh. In addition to the baseline mapping discussed above, permanent monitoring plots were established throughout the site to measure progress. Work was concentrated in summer months due to favorable tides and weather, but is continuing through the winter. As of January 2012, a total of 65% of the Spartina has been treated on the refuge. The primary control method is the use of brushcutters, but manual removal (especially on rocky substrates like dikes) and heavy equipment have also been employed. The latter has been used to remove dense stands on the refuge that can be reached from the dike or are otherwise accessible. When using these methods, Spartina is transported by dumptruck or four-wheel drive and composted at a suitable site on the refuge.
An educational brochure has been developed to summarize the impacts of Spartina and issues surrounding restoration of salt marshes. Volunteer events have been held annually, including the Spartina ShinDIG in 2009 and a “People for Pickleweed” event in 2010. These workdays have been sponsored by HBNWR, Friends of the Dunes, and Friends of HBNWR. Volunteers are a great source of labor in areas that are best treated using shovels and manual labor, check the Announcements board for upcoming events and presentations.
Bortolus, A. 2006. The austral cordgrass Spartina densiflora Brong.: its taxonomy, biogeography and natural history. Eicher, A.L. 1987. (3MB pdf) Salt marsh vascular plant distribution in relation to tidal elevation, Humboldt Bay, California. M.A. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. Falenski, H.D. 2007. (1.4MB pdf) Spartina densiflora, an invasive species in the marshes of Humboldt Bay. M.S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. Grazul, Z.I. and P.D. Rowland. 2010. (3.3MB pdf) The distribution of Spartina densiflora in Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge: Baseline mapping, 2010. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Arcata, California. Kittelson, P.M., and M. Boyd. 1997. Mechanisms of expansion for an introduced species of cordgrass, Spartina densiflora, in Humboldt Bay, California. Estuaries 20:770-778. Mitchell , M.L. 2010. (489K pdf) A description of terrestrial invertebrate assemblages and a comparison of sampling methods in pre and post-restoration Humboldt Bay salt marsh: A pilot study. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Arcata, California. Patten, K. and Casey, C.O. (3MB pdf) Shorebird use of Spartina-affected tidelands- Can we achieve functional habitat post-control? Washington State University Pickart, A. 2001. (5.5MB pdf) The distribution of Spartina densiflora and two rare salt marsh plants in Humboldt Bay 1998-1999. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Arcata, California. Pickart, A. 2005. (3.0MB pdf) Control of invasive Spartina densiflora in a high elevation salt marsh, Mad River Slough, Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, California. Pickart, A. 2008. (1.2MB pdf) Spartina eradication, Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Status Report to the State Coastal Conservancy. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grant Agreement No. 06-017. 11 pp. Spicher, D., and M. Josselyn. 1985. Spartina (Gramineae) in Northern California: distribution and taxonomic notes. Madroño 32:158-167. Links
|





















