Contaminant Exposure and Reproductive Success of Ospreys ( Pandion haliaetus) Nesting in Chesapeake Bay Regions of Concern
Peter C. McGowan Robert C. Hale Nancy H. Golden B. A. Rattner P. C. Toschik J. S. Hatfield R. F. Lukei Jr I. Schmitz-Afonso C. P. Rice
126 - 140
The Chesapeake Bay osprey population has more than doubled in size since restrictions were placed on the production and use of DDT and other toxic organochlorine contaminants in the 1970s. Ospreys are now nesting in the most highly polluted portions of the Bay. In 2000 and 2001, contaminant exposure and reproduction were monitored in ospreys nesting in regions of concern, including Baltimore Harbor and the Patapsco River, the Anacostia and middle Potomac rivers, and the Elizabeth River, and a presumed reference site consisting of the South, West, and Rhode rivers. A ldquosample eggrdquo from each study nest was collected for contaminant analysis, and the fate of eggs remaining in each nest (n = 14–16/site) was monitored at 7- to 10-day intervals from egg incubation through fledging of young. Ospreys fledged young in regions of concern (observed success: 0.88–1.53 fledglings/active nest), although productivity was marginal for sustaining local populations in Baltimore Harbor and the Patapsco River and in the Anacostia and middle Potomac rivers. Concentrations of p,pprime-DDE and many other organochlorine pesticides or metabolites, total PCBs, some arylhydrocarbon receptor-active PCB congeners and polybrominated diphenyl ether congeners, and perfluorooctanesulfonate were often greater in sample eggs from regions of concern compared to the reference site. Nonetheless, logistic regression analyses did not provide evidence linking marginal productivity to p,pprime-DDE, total PCBs, or arylhydrocarbon receptor-active PCB congener exposure in regions of concern. In view of the moderate concentrations of total PCBs in eggs from the reference site, concerns related to new and emerging toxicants, and the absence of ecotoxicological data for terrestrial vertebrates in many Bay tributaries, a more thorough spatial evaluation of contaminant exposure in ospreys throughout the Chesapeake may be warranted.
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Springer New York
http://www.springerlink.com/content/59p64at4mxtlp589/-p=d11a8a2d984c4659909fa072693d5a28&pi=13, 1 MB
NOTE: This link will take you to a site outside of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
We do not control the content or policies of the site you are about to visit. You should always check site policies before providing personal information or reusing content.
Chesapeake Bay Field Office Contaminants Program