U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Emblem
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Analytical Control Facility
A Branch of Ecological Services

Contents:
Who We Are
Services We Provide
Staff & Who to
Contact
Contract
Laboratories
How we assign Labs
Quality Control
Inorganic Lab
Statement of Work
Organic Lab
Statement of Work
Catalog Information
Pricing Guides
Analytical Methods
Contaminant Database

How to Use the Pricing Guides

 
Home
 
Links:
DOI Home Page
USFWS Home Page
DEQ Home Page
Contact us at: chemistry@fws.gov
Privacy & Disclaimer
FOIA
 
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) currently has contracts with numerous laboratories to provide chemical analyses for over 100 contaminants in animal tissues and environmental samples. In addition to these contaminants, there is a continual need to acquire analytical capability for other analytes. The Analytical Control Facility (ACF) has the responsibility for assessing and assuring the quality of these chemical analyses. The techniques that can be used to assess the quality of routine analyses that are performed both by contract laboratories and in our own FWS laboratories are distinctly different from those used to assess the quality of non-routine analyses.

The quality of contracted chemical analyses is assured by contracting with laboratories that have demonstrated their competence in performing the analyses and by monitoring their performance throughout the life of the contact.

The process of awarding a FWS analytical contract is very long and complicated, involving the coordinated efforts of scientists, administrators, and contracting specialists. Throughout the process the primary goal is to select laboratories capable of performing quality chemical analyses. A laboratory is evaluated by a committee of FWS chemists and is judged technically competent to perform the specific analyses requested if it passes two levels of evaluation. In the first level, the precision and accuracy of the laboratory’s analyses of test samples provided by the FWS are compared with the precision and accuracy that would be expected for the particular analytes. The committee establishes a minimum acceptable score based primarily on the technical judgement of the members. Only those laboratories that pass the first level of evaluation are considered in the second.

In the second level of evaluation the committee considers a number of criteria relating to the quality of the laboratory, its procedures, its facilities, its experience, and its personnel. Each evaluator scores each criterion based on the information provided by the laboratory. The committee establishes a minimum acceptable score based primarily on the technical judgement of the members. Those laboratories that pass both levels of evaluation are inspected by the representatives of the evaluation committee and the contracting and general services office. The purpose of the inspections is to confirm that the facilities, equipment, and personnel that were described in the proposal actually exists, and to observe the functioning of the laboratory. After a successful site visit the laboratory is considered technically competent. If, at the end of the contracting process, no laboratory is judged qualified then no award is made.

The precision and accuracy of the analyses performed by the contract laboratories are monitored over the life of the contract thought a variety of quality assurance procedures. Some are specific to each catalog that is analyzed, others are designed to test the laboratory operation in general.

The report submitted by a contact laboratory is required to contain the following:

  1. A brief description of the methods used in the analysis.
  2. The analytical results.
  3. The results of any quality control samples analyzed in conjunction with the reported catalog, especially:
    1. Procedural blanks.
    2. Duplicate analyses.
    3. Spiked sample analyses.
    4. Reference material analyses.
  4. Limits of detection.
  5. A description of any problems encountered in the analysis.
  6. Upon request the laboratory is required to submit copies of all raw data collected during the analysis.

Routine Organic Analysis
Routine Inorganic Analysis