![]() |
Division of Migratory Bird Management |
Data Center Home | Database Page |
Mid-winter Waterfowl Survey
PURPOSE
Some species of ducks, geese,
and swans are not presently monitored during the spring and summer on breeding
areas because they are either difficult to survey using airplanes or they nest
in remote and inaccessible Arctic areas. Abundance indices for some of these
species are obtained from surveys on wintering areas. The Mid-winter Waterfowl
Survey is a nationwide effort to survey waterfowl in major concentration areas.
The Mid-winter Survey is a primary source of information on population trends
for some species. This survey also is useful in documenting the distribution
of waterfowl on their wintering grounds and in assessing habitat use.
PROCEDURES
Survey design and field procedures
are determined by individual states. The Mid-winter Survey is, today, conducted
primarily by fixed-wing aircraft, although some states use helicopters and/or
conduct counts from automobile or boat in certain areas. The Mid-winter Survey
is known as a “cruise” survey, in that specific sampling procedures
are not defined. Instead, an aerial crew determines the best and most practical
means to conduct a complete count of all waterfowl within a predefined unit
area. The exact means of coverage may vary from year to year, however, the objective
is to obtain a complete count of all waterfowl within the survey unit. The survey
is conducted annually beginning in early January. Beginning in 2001, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service has made available a data entry program that enables
states to enter, error check, and upload data to a centrally maintained database.
The Atlantic and Mississippi Flyways are presently using this program and it
is anticipated that the Central Flyway and Pacific Flyway will begin using this
program for data entry in the near future.
DATABASES
A count database for this survey is
available online through the FWS/USGS Migratory Bird Data Center. This database
contains raw count data for survey zones, segments, and sub-segments for each
state. Data are available since 2001 for the Atlantic Flyway and since 2002
for the Mississippi Flyway. Data are not yet available online for the Central
or Pacific Flyway, although efforts to incorporate data for these Flyways are
ongoing. Historical data (prior to 2001) are presently not available online.
Significant challenges exist to compiling these data at the survey zone, segment,
or sub-segment level. Future efforts to compile historical data at the survey-unit
level will require close cooperation between states and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service in order to document changes in survey units that have occurred over
time. Presently, state total counts are available on a species-specific basis
by contacting the appropriate FWS Flyway Representative.
DOWNLOADABLE
FIELD DEFINITIONS
| Field
Name |
Field
Description |
| Year |
Survey
year |
|
Unit |
Unique
alpha-numeric survey unit identifier (<Statecode><Zone>.<Segment>.<Sub-segment>) |
|
UnitDesc |
Textual
description of survey unit |
|
Zone |
Survey
zone |
|
Segment |
Survey
segment |
|
Subseg |
Survey
sub-segment |
|
<Species
Code> |
Fields
titled by the 4-letter species code present
the count for that species for a given survey unit and year. |
|
SurvDate |
The
calendar date that the unit was surveyed |
|
SurvSte |
The
state conducting the survey of a particular unit (note in some instances
a state will complete a survey unit that is within the borders of an adjacent
state for purposes of convenience) |
|
Tot_hrs |
Hours
taken to complete a survey unit |
|
Tot_min |
Minutes
taken to complete a survey unit |
|
FlywayID |
Flyway
identifier (A-Atlantic,M-Mississippi,C-Central,P-Pacific) |
|
Not_surv |
YES-unit
was not surveyed, NO-unit was surveyed |
|
Surv_nf |
YES-unit
was surveyed but no birds recorded |
|
Temp |
Temperature
in degrees Fahrenheit |
|
Sky |
Sky
condition (Clear, Scattered, Broken, Overcast) |
|
Wind_dir |
Wind
direction (E, W, N, S, NW, NE, SW, SE) |
|
Wind_vel |
Wind
velocity in miles per hour |
|
Method |
Vehicle
used in the survey (Ground, Boat, Fixed-wing, Helicopter |
|
Pilot |
Pilot’s
name |
|
Obs1 |
Name
of the first observer |
|
Obs2 |
Name
of the second observer |
| Obs3 |
Name
of the third observer |
LIMITATIONS
The Mid-winter Survey has been criticized
for its lack of a statistical sampling design, differences in field methods
among states, changes in survey personnel and variability in personnel experience,
variation in survey effort, and changes in surveyed areas within states. Eggeman
and Johnson (1989) summarized many of the limitations with the Atlantic Flyway
Mid-winter Waterfowl Survey. Because of these limitations, caution must be exercised
in attempting the estimate and draw inferences about population trends using
data from this survey. Any such attempts should be made in close consultation
with state and Federal agency personnel that have knowledge of specific limitations
of these data for individual states and species.
LITERATURE CITED
Eggeman, D. R. and F. A. Johnson.
1989. Variation in effort and methodology for the midwinter waterfowl inventory
in the Atlantic Flyway. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:227-233.
Return to Mid-Winter Waterfowl Survey