The organization of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's (Service) FY 2000 Annual Performance Plan reflects the Department of the Interior's (DOI) approach to improve and streamline the Annual Performance Plan and better link the Plan with the Budget. The revised Annual Performance Plan presents the Service's goals and measures, and identifies the FY 2000 strategies and resources needed to achieve them, consistent with the Strategic Plan and budget proposal.
By following this presentation framework, DOI will be able to not only meet the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) but promote managerial accountability through a direct connection with the Strategic Plan, resources, and outcomes. The Annual Plan links coherently with goals contained in the Strategic Plan. The Annual Plan sets forth in measurable and quantifiable form the levels of performance for each goal in the budget year. The Annual Plan also links to the Service's budget request to Congress for FY 2000. This presentation provides the decision maker a context by which to make informed decisions on the allocation or reallocation of resources to better accomplish the mission of the organization.
The Annual Performance Plan for FY 2000 is divided into three sections:
Section I -- Introduction and Overview states the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service mission and addresses additional GPRA requirements.
Section II -- Goals includes Annual Performance Plan summary and descriptive goal narrative covering FY 1998, FY 1999, and FY 2000.
Section III -- Performance Measures and Verification provides
a simple presentation of the Service's methods to verify and validate the
measured values of actual performance.
I. Introduction and Overview
The Service's origins date back to 1871 when Congress established the U.S. Fish Commission to study the decrease in the nation's food fish and recommend ways to reverse the decline. Today the Service has the privilege of being the primary federal agency responsible for the protection, conservation, and renewal of fish and wildlife and their habitats for this and future generations. However, it must be clearly recognized that because fish and wildlife resources know no boundaries nor land ownership patterns, the conservation of those resources (mission of the Service) can only be accomplished through partnership efforts with other federal agencies, state and local governments, tribal governments, international and private organizations, and individuals.
The Service manages nearly 94 million acres across the United States,
encompassing a network of 516 refuges of the National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS) and 66 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHS). The National Wildlife Refuge
System, the National Fish Hatchery System, along with the fish, wildlife,
and plants that these systems protect and conserve, enrich people in a
great variety of ways. Service lands provide recreational opportunities
to 35 million visitors annually ---generates $401.1 million in sales to
regional economies; while recreational fishing annually contributes over
$38 billion to national and regional economies. The Service FY 2000 President's
Budget will provide $1.582 billion in support of Service programs and state
grants programs. The Service employs approximately 8,700 individuals and
32,000 volunteers at facilities across the country.
I.2 Mission Statement
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's mission is, working with others, to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
Unite all Service
Programs to lead or support ecosystem level conservation. We will achieve
this by becoming
a more technically capable and culturally diverse organization; through involving stakeholders; through
scientific expertise; through land and water management; and, through appropriate regulation.
I.3 Relationship to Departmental Goals
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has 3 Mission Goals [GPRA Program Activities] and 12 Long-term Goals. The Mission and Long-term Goals address program activities in three primary areas of the mission delivery: Sustaining Fish and Wildlife Populations, Habitat Conservation, and Public Use and Enjoyment of the resource. The Mission and Long-term Goals directly support the Department of Interior's Goals #1 - "Protect the Environment and Preserve Our Nation's Natural and Cultural Resources," and #2 - "Provide Recreation for America."
The following table relates the Service's GPRA program and long-term
goals to the goals of the DOI. Explanation of the DOI goals can be found
in the DOI Overview. Each long-term goal meets the GPRA requirements
in that it defines the level of performance to be achieved, expressed in
an objective, quantifiable, and measurable form that provides a basis for
comparing actual program results.
I. Protect the Environment and Preserve Our Nation's Natural and Cultural Resources
|GPRA Program Activity
[Service Mission Goal I]
I. Sustainability of Fish and Wildlife Populations
|Service Long-Term Goal
1.1 Migratory Birds -- By 2003, 20% of regional migratory bird populations demonstrate improvements in their population status because of management actions that have either increased their numbers or, in some cases, reduced the number of conflicts due to overabundance.
1.2 Imperiled Species -- By 2003, 40% of endangered and threatened species populations listed a decade or more are stabilized or improved and 60 species in decline are precluded from the need for listing under the Endangered Species Act.
1.3 Interjurisdictional Fish -- By 2003, 100% of stable interjurisdictional fish populations remain at or above current levels and 3% of depressed populations are restored to self-sustaining or, where appropriate, harvestable levels.
1.4 Marine Mammals -- By 2003, 100% of marine mammal populations over which the Service has jurisdiction will be at sustainable population levels or protected under conservation agreements.
1.5 Species of International Concern -- By 2003, 40% of transborder species of international concern over which the Service has jurisdiction will benefit from improved conservation efforts; 40 additional priority species of international concern will benefit from improved conservation efforts.
I. Protect the Environment and Preserve Our Nation's Natural and
|GPRA Program Activity
[Service-Mission Goal II]
II. Habitat Conservation:
A Network of Land and Waters
|Service Long Term Goal
2.1 Habitat Conservation On Service Lands -- By 2003, meet the
identified habitat needs of the Service lands by ensuring that 93,850,296
acres (total acreage in the NWRS) are protected, of which 3,500,000 acres
will be enhanced or restored. In addition, 80% of contaminated cleanup
projects will be completed according to their original schedule.
2.3 Habitat Conservation Off Service Lands -- By 2003, improve
the fish and wildlife populations focusing on trust resources, threatened
and endangered species, and species of special concern by protecting, enhancing,
and/or restoring 250,000 acres of wetlands habitat, restoring 395,000 acres
of upland habitat, and enhancing and/or restoring 2,500 riparian or stream
miles of habitat off-Service lands through partnerships and other identified
II. Provide Recreation for America
|GPRA Program Activity
[Service Mission Goal III]
III. Public Use and Enjoyment
|Service Long Term Goal
3.1 Greater Public Use on Service Lands -- By 2003, interpretive, educational, and recreational visits to National Wildlife Refuges and National Fish Hatcheries have increased by 15%.
3.2 Opportunities for Participating in Conservation On Service Lands -- By 2003, volunteer participation hours in Service programs is increased by 50% and refuges and hatcheries have 91 new friends groups over the FY 1997 levels.
3.3 Greater Public Use Off Service Lands -- By 2003, 100% of all Federal Aid state grant monies are used consistent with the enabling legislation.
3.4 Greater Opportunities for Participating in Recreational Fishing -- By 2003, 100% of mitigation hatchery production requirements are satisfied related to federal water development projects.
The Service uses three kinds of goals for the implementation of GPRA.
(1) Mission goals [GPRA Program Activities], which directly link to the mission of the Service, continue indefinitely, and are
inclusive of all significant programs that the Service conducts.
(2) Long-term goals, usually cover five years, focus on a limited number of accomplishments - results- needed to fulfill the
mission. All long-term goals are expressed in a manner which allows a future assessment of achievement.
(3) Annual performance goals provide the annual operational increment of the long-term strategic goals. Annual performance
goals are expressed as tangible, quantifiable, and measurable standards against which actual achievement can be compared.
The Service's FY 2000 Annual Performance Plan is measured by performance indicators to assess progress generally against a historical baseline. This direct linkage facilitates and allows progress to be measured in achieving the long-term goals over the period covered by the Strategic Plan. The target percentages and numbers in the long-term and annual performance goals were developed by the appropriate program authorities in collaboration with the Service's GPRA Core Team and approved by the Service Directorate.
The Service has chosen to use the GPRA Program Activities [Mission
goals] structure as a means of facilitating a crosswalk from the functionally-based
budget structure to the results-based long-term and annual goals. GPRA
program activities, as described in OMB circular A-11, provide for a consolidation,
aggregation, or disaggregation of program activities that are covered or
described by a set of performance goals. The Service has identified the
three principle sets of strategic plan performance goals--Mission Goals--
as the GPRA Program Activities.
I.5 Additional Annual Performance Plan Requirements
I.5.1 Customer Service
Over 33 million people visit national wildlife refuges every year. Refuges provide visitors with an understanding and appreciation of fish and wildlife ecology and help people understand their role in the environment. Additionally, they are places where high-quality, safe, and enjoyable wildlife dependent recreational experiences connect visitors to their natural resource heritage.
In 1984, the Service developed ten National Public Use Requirements to set the minimum standards for refuge facilities and programs for visitors. Public use reviews in some Regions have provided complete documentation of facilities and program improvements needed to attain the level of customer service identified in that process. Refuge users are involved in the evaluation and improvement of public programs. For instance, educational policies are being developed which integrate review and evaluation of Refuge educational materials and programs by local teachers.
In 1996, the Service developed a system for evaluating how well they
provided quality services and facilities to visitors. A "Customer Bill
of Rights" was developed and a pilot survey project was conducted to measure
the effectiveness in meeting visitor expectations and providing quality,
wildlife-dependent recreation and learning experiences. The Service is
also using other mechanisms including direct contacts with visitors during
programs, visitor center visits, and off-refuge contacts. Direct feedback
is gained during the comprehensive conservation planning process through
information-gathering meetings and open houses. The new compatibility process
also integrates public opinion and feedback on compatible uses into this
approach. Finally, the growth in Refuge Support Groups, formerly called
"Friends Groups," provides for community involvement at individual refuges
on a day-to-day basis.
I.5.2 Use of Non-Federal Parties in Preparing this Annual Performance Plan
The Service's Annual Performance Plan was prepared in conformance with Section 220.7 of OMB Circular A-11. Preparation of the Annual Performance Plan involved Service employees in all regions and at every level of the organization. The Service's Annual Work Guidance directly reflects the goals and performance the Service intends to achieve in annual increments toward successfully completing its long-term strategic goals.
I.5.3 Crosscutting Issues
Northwest Forest Plan
Initiated in 1994, the Northwest Forest Plan is a comprehensive and cooperative approach to managing forests in the Pacific Northwest region. The Fish and Wildlife Service is working together with other federal agencies, States, local and private landowners as partners in achieving a ecological balance for the Northwest. The Forest Plan provides economic and employment assistance to communities impacted by changing forest management practices, and for significant long-term conservation and management benefits of key species on federal lands, such as the northern spotted owl, marbled murrelet, grizzly bear, and gray wolf.
For FY 2000, the Service requests $19.7 million to continue the cooperative efforts between federal and non-federal parties to promote sustainable timber harvests and restore the ecological integrity of fish and wildlife resources under the Forest Plan.
Southwest Ecosystem Restoration
The southwestern United States consists of a unique collection of highly diverse landscapes, ranging from sea level elevations at the Texas gulf coast to over 13,000 feet in the mountains of northern New Mexico, and temperature extremes of over 120 degrees in the Sonoran desert to the cool habitats of alpine forests, open prairies and pine woods. Conflicts over use of natural resources make conservation difficult, and the Service is proposing the Southwest Ecosystem Restoration initiative to meet these challenges. .
The Service is participating in a Departmental task force of federal, state, local and tribal organizations that is addressing the growing ecological problems in the southwest States of Arizona and New Mexico. Arizona and New Mexico have a very high percentage of federal lands, which leads to a substantial Endangered Species Act section 7 consultation workload. There are 90 listed species and 26 candidate species in Arizona and New Mexico. Due to the increasing number of federal projects that the Service is asked to consult on, Southwest Ecosystem Restoration will allow the Service to better fulfill its habitat conservation responsibilities pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.
Southwest Ecosystem Restoration projects will meet a large amount of unaddressed restoration and conservation work for native fish species, primarily as a result of the water allocation issues that predominate in the southwest. Many federally-listed or at-risk species have extremely limited ranges, and the small watershed projects that should be initiated would have a tremendous impact on habitat needs. Instream and riparian projects also represent a critical component for recovery and conservation efforts that need to be addressed.
The Service is requesting an additional $2.975 million in FY 2000 for the Southwest Ecosystem Restoration initiative. The Service will use the additional funds for the following activities:
The Mississippi River Basin, which includes the Mississippi River, the Ohio River, the Missouri River, and their tributaries, is one of the most significant and complex riverine ecosystems in the United States. The Basin stretches over 2,400 miles, encompasses 86 million people in 29 states (32 percent of the United States population), and drains 41 percent of the land area in the continental United States.
The Service is proposing a collaborative basin-wide effort to restore the well being of the Mississippi River and its tributaries in FY 2000.
The Mississippi River Basin Partnership will support a number of habitat and species assessments, restoration and improvement projects from headwaters to the delta. The partnerships will leverage federal funding for fish passage, migratory birds, and habitat restoration.
The Service will work with groups such as, the Mississippi River Interstate
Cooperative Resource Association, the Missouri River Natural Resources
Committee, and the Lower Mississippi River Conservation Committee. For
FY 2000, the Service requests $1.4 million to support the Mississippi River
I.5.4 Management Issues
The key management issues identified by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the Service regarding Operations and Maintenance are being addressed as follows:
Facilities Maintenance - In the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) testimony in February 1998, before the House Subcommittee on Interior and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, the OIG concluded that insufficient documentation was available to determine whether maintenance backlog data were complete and accurate. Also, the OIG determined that the Service included items in its backlog that did not qualify for inclusion under Federal financial accounting standards. These issues are part of an ongoing OIG audit that began in November 1997, of the maintenance of Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries. The Service recognizes that improvements can be made in data recording and collection and will continue to work with the OIG on these issues during the audit. The Department has addressed this in a Five -Year Maintenance and Capital Improvement Plan. The Service has joined in the Departmentwide effort to develop a set of common definitions used for facilities maintenance; the results should standardize reporting for bureaus and improve the consistency of data being reported. Annual Performance Goal 2.2.1 of this plan reflects the Service's efforts to address the infrastructure stewardship issue. The Service anticipates that its update of the Maintenance Management System next year will contain improved cost estimates and source documentation. Feedback from the OIG's audit will be used to refine our maintenance data.
Operation and Maintenance of Government Furnished Quarters -
The OIG reported in January 1996, that the Service had more quarters than
needed, and recommended that the Service review existing Government furnished
quarters to identify unneeded units and to dispose of excess quarters.
The Service has taken steps to improve quarters management. With the exceptions
of quarters used to house volunteers and quarters used as substitutes for
GSA leased space, quarters not utilized for any three-year period (three
years documents a pattern) are expected to be removed from the quarters
rolls. Additionally, on an annual basis, the Service Quarters Officer identifies
any quarters showing a vacant status for a three-year period and requests
a justification from the Region reporting the vacancy.
I.5.5 Adjustments to the Strategic Plan
During the past year, discussions with the Department of the Interior, Office of Management and Budget, the General Accounting Office, and Congressional staff on the Department's and Service's first Strategic Plan, and FY 1999 Annual Performance Plan, submitted to Congress, have emphasized the need to reduce the complexity and number of goals and measures, improve the clarity of performance information, and improve the linkage of funding to performance setting and results.
The Service has learned from the past year's experiences and has refocused its Strategic Plan. The September 1997 Strategic Plan provided the foundation for this effort to streamline and simplify our goals and measures. The September 1998 version retains the primary mission goals which focus directly on the Service's significant mission responsibilities; Sustainable Fish and Wildlife Populations, Habitat Conservation, and the Public's Use and Enjoyment of the Resource On Service Lands. The September 1998 version achieves a substantial reduction in the number of goals and performance measures through aggregation and consolidation; resulting in the elimination of 8 long-term goals and 60 performance measures. The streamlined plan combines 2 strategic goals for threatened and endangered species, quantified the interjurisdictional fish and migratory bird goals, established an international species goal, simplified all habitat goals, and limited the public use goals to Service activities. Further, the refocused Strategic Plan excludes the organizational management goals (i.e., means goals) presented in the Service's initial Strategic Plan as -- Mission Goal 4 Workforce Excellence. Goals for internal bureau functions and operations, are not included in the GPRA Strategic and Annual Performance Plans. These essential operational processes are discussed within the context of support necessary to achieve the annual goals. The following is a comparison chart of the recent changes made to the Service's September 1997 Strategic Plan.
|Sustainability of Fish and Wildlife Populations
Mission Goal 1: Migratory birds, endangered fish, wildlife and
plant species, interjurisdictional fish, and
|Sustainability of Fish and Wildlife Populations
Mission Goal 1: Migratory birds, endangered fish, wildlife and plant species, interjurisdictional fish, marine mammals, and species of international concern are conserved, protected, enhanced or restored. The Service is participating in conservation of other species when its expertise, facilities, or lands can enhance state, tribal, local, or other efforts.
Rewritten to include species of international concern, to include all our partner groups.
|1.1 Migratory Birds
By 2002, Migratory bird populations are conserved in accordance with partnerships and approved plans.
|1.1 Migratory Birds
By 2003, 20% of regional migratory bird populations demonstrate improvements in their population status because of management actions that have either increased their numbers or, in some cases, reduced the number of conflicts due to overabundance.
|New Goal--added target..|
|1.2 Imperiled Species
By 2003, 40% of endangered and threatened species populations listed a decade or more are stabilized or improved and 60 species in decline are precluded from the need for listing under the Endangered Species Act.
|New Goal-- uses "Imperiled Species" instead of "Declining
Former 1.2-- IJ fish goal moved to 1.3
|1.2 Interjurisdictional Fish Through 2002, interjurisdictional fish populations are conserved through conservation efforts related to approved management plans.||1.3 Interjurisdictional Fish
Through 2003, 100% of stable interjurisdictional fish populations remain at or above current levels and 3% of depressed populations are restored to self-sustaining or, where appropriate, harvestable levels.
|Rewritten IJ fish goal with targets for stable IJ fish populations and depressed populations restored and/or harvestable levels.|
|1.3 Declining Aquatic Species
By 2002, the population levels of 20% of identified declining aquatic species are stabilized or increased through proactive conservation measures.
|1.3, now 1.2 with target based on "Imperiled Species" instead of "aquatic species"|
|1.4 Marine Mammals
By 2002, Alaskan marine mammal populations are conserved through provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, international agreements and co-management plan objectives.
|1.4 Marine Mammals
By 2003, 100% of marine mammal populations, over which the Service has jurisdiction, will be at sustainable population levels or protected under conservation agreements.
|Rewritten to include marine mammals outside of Alaska.|
|1.5 Candidate Species
By 2002, the status of 183 candidate (to be considered for listing as threatened or endangered) species has been resolved.
|1.5 Species of International Concern
By 2003, 40% of transborder species of international concern over which the Service has jurisdiction will benefit from improved conservation efforts; 40 additional priority species of international concern will benefit from improved conservation efforts.
|New SG 1.5
Former 1.5--concept moved to new SG 1.2
|1.6 Stabilized T&E Populations
By 2002, 40% of endangered and threatened species populations are stabilized or improved.
|1.6 -- Incorporated into new SG 1.2, target remains the same|
|1.7 Species Decline (LE)
By 2002, illegal activities as a factor in the decline of any federally-protected species are reduced by 5 %.
|1.7-- Incorporated into new SG 1.2,|
|1.8 Native American tribes
By 2002, Service fish and wildlife conservation assistance is increased by 50% to Native American tribes in furtherance of The Native American Policy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Secretarial Order 3206.
|1.8--Removed from SGs, Elevated to Service strategy, discussed in the Introduction section.|
|Habitat Conservation -Network of Lands & Waters
Mission Goal 2: An ecologically diverse network of lands and waters---of various ownerships--- is conserved to provide habitats for marine mammals and migratory, interjurisdictional, threatened, endangered, and other species associated with ecosystems conserved in cooperation with others.
|Habitat Conservation -Network of Lands & Waters
Mission Goal 2: An ecologically diverse network of lands and waters--of various ownerships--is conserved in cooperation with others to provide habitats for migratory birds, imperiled species, interjurisdictional fish, marine mammals and species of international concern associated with those ecosystems.
Species reordered to duplicate the chronological order of the strategic goals. "Imperiled Species" used instead of threatened/endangered.
|2.1 Agreements with others
By 2002, agreements are reached among the Service, other federal agencies, nations, states, tribes, local governments, and private landowners and organizations to provide habitat for marine mammals and migratory, endangered, threatened, interjurisdictional, and other species associated with ecosystems conserved in cooperation with others.
|2.1 Habitat Conservation On Service Lands
By 2003, meet the identified habitat needs of the Service lands by ensuring that 93,850,000 acres (total acreage in the NWRS) are protected, of which 3,500,000 acres will be enhanced or restored. In addition, 80% of cleanup projects on Service lands will be completed according to their original schedule.
|Removed as strategic goal, discussed in the Strategic
Plan strategies and in the MISSION & INTRODUCTION sections
New 2.1 incorporates 2.4
|2.2 Upland habitats
By 2002, 64.7 million acres of upland habitats are protected, restored, or enhanced.
|2.2 Infrastructure Stewardship On Service Lands
By 2003, 23% of mission critical water management and public use facilities will be in fair or good condition as measured by the Facilities Condition Index.
|2.2 Removed Uplands as strategic goal, consolidated
into new 2.1 & 2.3
New 2.2 strategic goal, also added "fair or" good condition
|2.3 Wetlands & Riparian Habitats
By 2002, 28.4 million acres of wetlands and 3,250 miles of riparian habitats are protected, restored or enhanced.
|2.3 Habitat Conservation Off-Service Lands
By 2003, improve the fish and wildlife populations focusing on trust resources, threatened and endangered species of special concern by protecting, enhancing, restoring or create 250,000 acres of wetlands habitat, restoring 395,000 acres of wetlands habitat, and enhancing and/or restoring 2,500 riparian or stream miles of habitat off-Service lands through partnerships and other identified conservation strategies.
|Rewritten to focus on trust resources and threatened and endangered species and to include partnerships off-Service lands|
|2.4 Deep Water & Riverine Habitats
By 2002, 15.5 million acres of deep water and riverine habitat are protected, restored, or enhanced.
|2.4 Removed as strategic goal and incorporated into new 2.1 & 2.3|
|2.5 Consultation & Technical Assistance
By 2000, mechanisms are developed---in consultation with others---and implemented to determine the habitat benefits of Service consultative and technical assistance.
|2.5 Removed as a strategic goal. Concept incorporated in narratives.|
By 2002, 27 million acres of habitats for endangered and threatened species and species of concern are included in Habitat Conservation Plans through the implementation of Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act.
|2.6 Removed as strategic goal and discussed in narratives.|
|Americans and Wildlife
Mission Goal 3: Americans have the opportunity to understand and participate in the conservation and use of fish and wildlife resources.
|Public Use and Enjoyment
Mission Goal 3: Our citizens and guests have the opportunity to understand and participate in the conservation and use of fish and wildlife resources.
Americans changed to "our citizens and guests" to include internationals.
|3.1 Greater Public Understanding
By 2002, an increasing percentage of Americans are reached by Service activities and understand the relationship between healthy fish and wildlife resources and sound management practices.
|3.1 Greater Public Use on Service Lands
By 2003, interpretive, educational and recreational visits to National Wildlife Refuges and National Fish Hatcheries have increased by 15%.
|3.1 Removed public understanding from strategic goal,
but discussed in narratives.
New 3.1 includes target for 10% increase in visits to NWR & NFH
|3.2 Opportunities For Participation
By 2002, opportunities for participation in uses of fish and wildlife resources have increased by 3% from 1996 levels.
|3.2 Opportunities for Participating in Conservation On
By 2003, volunteer participation hours in Service programs is increased by
50% and refuges and hatcheries have 91 new friends groups from the FY 1997 level.
|3.2 Rewritten, concepts in new 3.1 and 3.4
New 3.2 includes increased target for volunteer hours and a new target for increased NWR (50) & NFH (10) friends groups.
|3.3 Volunteer Participation
By 2002, volunteer participation in Service fish and wildlife programs has increased by 5% in the number of hours from 1997 levels.
|3.3 moved to 3.2 and target for volunteer hours increased.|
|3.3 Greater Public Use Off Service Lands
Through 2003, 100% of all Federal Aid state grant monies are used consistent with the enabling legislation.
|New 3.3---Federal Aid|
|3.4 Greater Opportunities for Participating in
By 2003, 100% of mitigation hatchery production requirements are satisfied related to federal water development projects.
|3.4 New fishery mitigation strategic goal.|
Mission Goal 4: The Service's workforce, scientific capability and business practices---in cooperation with the Department's scientific expertise---fully support the achievement of the bureau's mission.
|Removed. Elements were incorporated into Mission Goals 1 and 2. Concepts elevated as Service Statements of Principles to govern all actions of the Service; thus, adopted as Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's).|
Capital Asset Plans and Justifications (Exhibit 300B in OMB Circular A-11) are required for major capital acquisitions, which are defined by the Department for any construction project that (a) requires construction funding (whether through advance appropriations or sequential appropriations) in more than one fiscal year, or (b) involves construction costs in excess of $10 million. As such, Capital Asset Plans and Justifications are included for three FY 2000 construction projects: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma, road rehabilitation ($19.758 million of phased repairs over many years); Tern Island NWR, Hawaii, seawall rehabilitation ($9.5 million of phased construction over several years), and Clark R. Bavin National Fish & Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, Oregon, Forensics Laboratory Expansion ($9 million in construction phased over several years).
I.5.7 Waivers for Managerial Accountability and Flexibility
The Service is requesting no waivers of administrative procedural requirements and controls.
Table of Contents:FY 2000 Annual Performance Plan
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Home Page