|
Gray Wolf in Recovery in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and adjacent states were once home to gray wolves. Killing by humans and declining numbers of prey - bison, elk, and white-tailed deer in the south and moose, deer, caribou, and beaver in the north - caused wolf declines early on. By 1838, wolves were eliminated from the southern portion of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. Bounties paid for dead wolves began during the 1800s and by the early 1900s wolves were also gone from southern Minnesota and Wisconsin. By 1960 wolves were nearly eliminated from Wisconsin, Michigan (except Isle Royale), and most of Minnesota.
Wisconsin protected the wolf in 1957, after the species was extirpated from the state. Michigan followed suit in 1965 with endangered species protection for the gray wolf. At that time only a few lone wolves remained in the Upper Peninsula, and an isolated population existed on Isle Royale.
In Minnesota, a bounty on all predators, including wolves, continued until 1965. Between 1965 and 1974, Minnesota had an open season on wolves and a Directed Predator Control Program. During this time, about 250 wolves were taken each year and the wolf population was estimated at 350 to 700 animals. The state’s control program and open season continued until May 1974 when the gray wolf gained protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Wolf Recovery
Recovery criteria established in the Recovery Plan includes the assured survival of the gray wolf in Minnesota and a population of 100 or more wolves in Wisconsin/Michigan for a minimum of five consecutive years. The Recovery Plan identified 1,250 to 1,400 as a population goal for Minnesota. The state’s wolf population has been at or above that level since the late 1970s. The Wisconsin/Michigan wolf population has been above 100 since the winter of 1993-1994, achieving the latter numerical goal in the Recovery Plan.
With this consistent expansion in numbers and range, the gray wolf is healthy and has recovered in the western Great Lakes region.
Minnesota
Over the last three decades wolves increased their range into north central and central Minnesota. This expansion was due to ESA protection from unregulated killing, high deer numbers, and dispersal of individuals from existing packs. Telemetry studies documented wolves dispersing from the major wolf range in northeastern Minnesota to recolonize new areas and wolves dispersing from the few packs in north central Minnesota that had survived the “bounty era.”
Today, wolves live in areas with higher road and human densities than previously believed could be suitable for wolf survival, although these two factors still limit the areas suitable for wolf packs. Wolves continue to disperse to areas in west-central and east-central Minnesota (just north of Minneapolis/St. Paul), North and South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
In May of 2000 the Minnesota Legislature passed a bill that set up a framework for wolf management. Using that guidance, the Minnesota DNR, in consultation with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, completed the Minnesota Wolf Management Plan in early 2001. It delineates two wolf management zones and provides different levels of protection in the two zones. The Plan also establishes a minimum state population goal of 1,600 wolves and defers any action on allowing a general public taking of wolves for five years following federal delisting.
Wisconsin
When monitoring began, 25 wolves were documented in the state. During the mid-1980s wolf numbers reached a low of only 15, probably due to an epidemic of canine parvovirus. Wild wolves seemed to develop some degree of natural resistance and wolf numbers increased after 1985. Since that time, the Wisconsin wolf population has steadily increased. Population estimates between 1985 and 2008 increased from 83 wolves to 549 wolves.
Parvovirus seems to be declining, but is still present in Wisconsin wolves. Lyme disease and mange are also present but their impact, particularly on pup survival, is not well known. Wisconsin DNR monitors wolf movements in the Wisconsin-Minnesota border area, as well as the wolf range expansion southward into the central portion of the state.
The Wisconsin DNR developed a state wolf management plan that was approved in October of 1999. That plan sets a management goal of 350 wolves (outside of Indian Reservations). This goal was exceeded and in 2004 Wisconsin changed the wolf’s status from “threatened” to “protected wild animal.” In 2006 the Wisconsin management plan was updated and approved by the Natural Resources Board. The wolf management goal remains 350 wolves outside of reservations.
Michigan
The end of the 1996-97 winter count found the number of wolves at 112, down from the 116 documented during the previous late winter count. That decline appears to have been due to two consecutive harsh winters and a high incidence of mange. In some areas of the Upper Peninsula, deer numbers were reduced by 80 percent due to record snowfalls and low temperatures during the 1995-96 winter. This provided more prey for wolves during that winter but was followed by another severe winter with unusually deep snow in 1996-97. During that second winter there were few deer for wolves to prey upon and wolf deaths were high. Since then, Michigan DNR trackers estimate that there were at least 174 wolves in 1998-99, increasing to 520 in 2007-2008. Radio-collaring and monitoring Michigan’s wolf population continues.
Michigan, through the DNR, completed a Wolf Recovery and Management Plan in December 1997, which was revised in 2008. The Michigan plan recommends managing for a minimum of 200 wolves on the Upper Peninsula. The DNR’s goal is to ensure the wolf population remains viable and above a level that would require either federal or state reclassification as a threatened or endangered species.
There have been wolves residing on Isle Royale, Michigan, in Lake Superior, since the winter of 1948-49. Their population has moved up and down with that of their prime prey -moose. Disease is also believed to be an important factor in population fluctuations. Following a peak of 50 wolves in 1979, the population plummeted to the low teens in the late 1980s and early 1990s. They have since rebounded to 23 wolves. Due to their isolation from other wolves, these wolves do not contribute to Federal wolf recovery goals.
Revised July 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

