Connect With Us
Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis)
Bat Survey Protocol1 for Assessing Use of Potential Hibernacula
A typical cave or mine portal survey is an attempt to determine presence or probable absence of the species; it does not provide sufficient data to determine population size or structure. Following these guidelines will standardize procedures for bat surveys at caves and mine portals. Although the capture of Indiana bats confirms their presence, failure to catch Indiana bats does not absolutely confirm their absence. If one or more Indiana bats should be captured at a particular site, subsequent surveys may be necessary before one can confidently conclude the feature is being used as a hibernaculum.
ASSESSING SUITABILITY OF CAVES/ABANDONED MINES FOR BAT SURVEYS
In general, a cave or portal opening can be dismissed from bat surveys (i.e., they are not suitable) if the following conditions apply:
SAMPLING DATES, TIMES AND TEMPERATUE CRITERIA
No equipment, litter or other debris will be left unattended at site that could result in the capture or entanglement of any animals. Any equipment stored at site between sampling sessions should be clearly labeled with contact information.
Harp Traps (first choice): Place in front of opening and block surrounding space with plastic sheeting or bird netting. Traps should be tended at least once per hour. When the catch rate is high (>25 bats per hour) or during inclement weather, traps should be tended more frequently.
Mist Nets (second choice): 50 denier, 38mm mesh. Place in front or around openings that can not be harp trapped. Nets need to be monitored closely and checked at least once every 10 minutes. At sites with a heavy bat swarm, the net should be monitored continuously.
Bat Detector: In addition to the harp trap or mist nets, an ultrasonic bat detector should be on site to periodically monitor general bat activity and to assess the general effectiveness of the harp trap or mist net placement.
Alternative Monitoring Techniques: In situations where cave/mine entrances can not be safely/effectively trapped or netted, bat detectors (e.g., heterodyne or AnaBat) and/or night-vision/infrared/thermal-imaging recording devices should be used to monitor and record bat activity to determine bat use of the site. Bat activity in or around the entrance can be monitored by counting bat passes with a bat detector, or night vision/infrared video tapes can be recorded to provide actual counts of bats entering and exiting the opening. As with trapping, monitoring should be conducted for 5 hours. Reporting format will be: Start and end time for 1-hour sample period and bat passes for that hour. If a bat detector is used to monitor a cave/mine entrance, the biologist should 1) manually operate a tunable detector to quantify the amount of bat activity (i.e., tally # of bat passes/hour for 5 hours) at the cave entrance, 2) write down the peak frequency associated with each bat pass, and 3) take field notes describing the bat activity throughout the 5-hour sampling period (e.g., are bats entering and/or exiting the entrance, just passing by etc…).
If alternative monitoring techniques are needed to complete a survey, these should be coordinated with the Service’s Field Office in that state on a case-by-case basis prior to being employed.
Standard measurements should be taken and recorded for all captured bat species. Photo documentation of Indiana bats is also encouraged.
Fecal Samples: Fecal samples should be collected from Indiana bats (and other species as time allows), clearly labeled, placed within separate Ziploc bags, and stored on ice or in a freezer.
Banding of M.sodalis: To identify recaptured bats, a single, uniquely numbered/embossed band (preferably celluloid/plastic) of a high-contrast color (e.g., white) should be placed on the right forearm of each male and the left forearm of each female Indiana bat. If many bats are captured at one time, it is acceptable to only band a subset of the individuals to avoid having to hold them for a long period of time. Please use your best professional judgment.
1 Adapted from the protocol used by the Pennsylvania Game Commission
Last updated: January 3, 2013